docs: replace existing var with const - #19578
Merged
mdjermanovic merged 1 commit intoMar 26, 2025
Merged
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-eslint ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
SwetaTanwar
force-pushed
the
docs/replace-var-with-const
branch
from
March 26, 2025 17:30
28b7419 to
9612711
Compare
SwetaTanwar
force-pushed
the
docs/replace-var-with-const
branch
from
March 26, 2025 17:34
9612711 to
377999c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Related to #19240
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?