Skip to main content
Journal of Anatomy logoLink to Journal of Anatomy
. 2024 Oct 12;246(2):190–204. doi: 10.1111/joa.14139

The development of the external genitals in female human embryos and foetuses. Part 1: Perineal thick skin, clitoris and labia

Cindy J M Hülsman 1, Hui Gao 1, Nutmethee Kruepunga 2, Greet M C Mommen 1, S Eleonore Köhler 1, Jill P J M Hikspoors 1, Wouter H Lamers 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11737317  PMID: 39395399

Abstract

Concomitant with the rupture of the cloacal membrane in the 6th week of development, the intermediate layer of the perineal‐skin epithelium thickens. We investigated its distribution and the development of the corresponding subcutaneous compartments in serial sections of female human embryos and foetuses and prepared 3D reconstructions to establish topographic relations. The thick‐skin area becomes restricted to the outlets of the genital and intestinal tracts. The clitoris and labia majora become identifiable at ~7 weeks. The mesenchymal mass inside the clitoris soon divides into the glans and the cavernous bodies. The clitoral hood forms between 10 and 14 weeks as a fold of tissue that extends from proximal to distal over the glans. Due to the caudal bending of the clitoral shaft, the labia majora gradually cover the clitoris after ~14 weeks. The labia minora form at ~8 weeks from the ridges of thick‐skin epithelium that flank the genital exit. They are continuous ventrolaterally with the clitoral hood and ventromedially with the apex of the cavernous body. Dorsally, their dense subcutaneous mesenchymal core extends to the anal canal. Between 8 and 14 weeks, the urethra lengthens axially, while the vaginal vestibule extends ventrally. In this period, the urethral plate of female embryos is mitotically active but does not increase in volume, which suggests that it contributes to vestibular growth. In conclusion, we observed a temporal correlation between the development of the thick‐skin epithelium and that of the external genitals, with a distribution that is reminiscent of the dihydrotestosterone‐sensitive skin.

Keywords: crown‐rump length, developmental anatomy, female external genitals, perineal thick skin, sexual programming window


The peri‐urogenital thick skin induces the formation of sex‐hormone‐sensitive endodermal and mesenchymal structures, and striated muscles. Endoderm and mesenchyme mutually exchange sex‐hormone‐dependent differentiative signals. Whether these signals also affect subcutaneous muscle development is not yet known. The peri‐anal thick skin induces the formation of the external anal sphincter but, apart for its ventral extension in males, shows no sexual dimorphism.

graphic file with name JOA-246-190-g004.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

The (female) external genitals are located in the perineal region of the body. The perineal region consists of a urogenital triangle ventrally and an anal triangle dorsally. Recently, several new descriptions of the anatomy of female external genitals have become available (Abdulcadir et al., 2020; Haylen et al., 2017; O'Connell et al., 2004; Puppo & Puppo, 2015), but they mostly concern adult anatomy. The developmental concepts of the external genitals, such as the normal and abnormal development of the genital tubercle, the genital folds and the labioscrotal swellings, are well‐established (e.g. Hamilton & Mossman, 1972; Patten, 1953). Similarly, their differential sensitivity to steroidal hormones and other signalling factors is well‐studied (Imperato‐McGinley et al., 1974; Overland et al., 2016; Sharpe, 2020; Wilson et al., 1981). However, the relations between genital folds and tubercle, and features related to the development of the perineal region, such as the development of the clitoral glans, shaft, and hood, the vaginal vestibule and the anal canal, are not so well established.

Previously, we observed that the perineal skin was markedly thicker than the surrounding skin (Kruepunga et al., 2018). We reported that this thick perineal skin first appeared at Carnegie stage (CS) 18 (~6 weeks of development) and contributed to the formation of the genital folds (labia minora and vaginal vestibule) and the anal canal (connection of the hindgut with the anus). In the present studies, we report changes in the distribution and differentiation of the thick perineal skin and the associated external genitals in female human embryos between 6 and 20 weeks of development. Although we realize that the perineum is a topographic entity, we have separated its description into two parts: part 1 focuses on the development of the thick skin, clitoris and labia, while part 2 (Hülsman et al., 2025) examines the persisting parts of the thick skin and its surroundings in the caudal rim of the vaginal vestibule and the anal canal, and the locally forming cutaneous muscles. We illustrate developmental features with histological sections and its topography with interactive 3D‐PDFs. In these, we have paid special attention to the topography of the perineal structures relative to the pelvic organs and perineal skin. Together, these tools provide a detailed account of the processes that lead to the definitive configuration of the external female genitals and perineal area.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Embryos and foetuses

This study used historical collections of anonymous human embryos and foetuses, which were compiled >50 years ago. These collections are exempt from ethical approval according to the Dutch regulations for the proper use of human tissue for (bio‐)medical research purposes. The study used digitized images of serial sections of specimens from the collections of human embryos and foetuses of the Departments of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden; Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Amsterdam; Radboud Medical Center (RadboudMC), Nijmegen, The Netherlands; the Georg‐August‐Universität, Göttingen (Blechschmidt Collection); and the Ruhr Universität, Bochum, Germany (Hinrichsen collection) (Table 1). In addition, embryos of the Carnegie Collection in Washington DC, which are freely accessible on the internet, were included. The criteria of O'Rahilly and Muller (2010) were used to determine Carnegie Stages (CS) and ages of development of the embryos. The age of the foetuses (>8 weeks of development, Figure 1) was based on the comparison of their crown‐rump length (CRL) with that in reference studies (Table 2). The standard deviation for autopsies was ~1 week in the 2nd trimester and ~2 weeks in the last trimester (Bartosch et al., 2019; Hansen et al., 2003; Maroun & Graem, 2005; Szpinda et al., 2015), while that for ultrasound measurements was ~0.5 weeks in the 2nd half of 1st trimester and ~1 week in the 2nd trimester (Papageorghiou et al., 2014; Robinson & Fleming, 1975). Note that ultrasound measurements of CRLs were carried out only during the first 120 days of development.

TABLE 1.

Overview of the human embryos and foetuses described in this study.

Stage/weeks Number CRL (mm) Plane Source
CS18/6 weeks S4430 14 Transverse DREM
CS19/6.5 weeks 1950‐04‐20 19 Frontal Göttingen
CS20/7 weeks S2025 20 Transverse AMC
CS22/7.5 weeks S983 28 Transverse DREM
CS23/8 weeks S4141 35 Transverse AMC
9 weeks S89 37 Transverse LUMC
10 weeks S4908 50 Transverse AMC
10 weeks S1744 60 Transverse LUMC
11 weeks S1743 80 Sagittal LUMC
12 weeks S2383 105 Transverse LUMC
13 weeks S2212 110 Sagittal LUMC
14 weeks ME29 534 105 Frontal Bochum
15 weeks S2392 130 Transverse LUMC
20 weeks S2290 200 Sagittal LUMC

Abbreviation: CRL, crown‐rump length.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

A reference graph for the estimation of the developmental age of foetuses. Several literature sources were combined to estimate the age of a foetus based on their crown‐rump length (CRL). The assessment of developmental age in the studies was based on post‐mortem (black regression line, with colour‐coded sources) or on ultrasound measurements (red regression line; for references, see Table 2). Correlation was fitted with a 5th‐order polynomial. Both sets of data differ only minimally. Logarithmic transformation of the Y‐axis shows that growth during early organogenesis (first 6–7 weeks) was ~30‐fold higher than during the last 4 months of pregnancy.

TABLE 2.

Studies used to compose the graphs shown in Figure 1.

Pregnancy period Reported variation Reference
Post‐mortem measurements
3–8 weeks Range O'Rahilly and Muller (2010)
3–18 weeks Not available Patten (1953)
7–18 weeks Range Jakobovits et al. (1972)
10–24 weeks Standard deviation Hansen et al. (2003)
10–40 weeks Standard deviation Bartosch et al. (2019)
10–41 weeks Percentile Maroun and Graem (2005)
16–28 weeks Standard deviation Szpinda et al. (2015)
Ultrasound measurements
4–11 weeks Range Guirgis et al. (1993)
4–11.5 weeks Standard deviation Robinson and Fleming (1975)
5–11 weeks Not available Drumm et al. (1976)
5.5–11 weeks Not available MacGregor et al (1987)
4–12 weeks Percentile Loughna et al. (2009)
5–13 weeks Percentile Papageorghiou et al. (2014)
5.5–14.5 weeks Not available Babymed (https://www.babymed.com/tag/ultrasound‐measurements)

We have prepared detailed reconstructions of the development of the external genitals and perineal thick skin in 13 embryos and foetuses between CS18 (~6 weeks of development) and ~ 20 weeks of development (Table 2). Specimens from the foetal period were relatively scarce. If appropriate, sections of male foetuses were also studied (and identified as such). Furthermore, we studied the serial sections of 13 female embryos between 8 and 13 weeks of development (35–105 mm CRL) of the Domènech‐Mateu collection at the Autonomous University of Barcelona (courtesy Prof. Rosa Mirapeix).

2.2. Image acquisition, 3D‐reconstruction and visualization

Serial sections of human embryos from the AMC, LUMC and RadboudMC were digitized with an Olympus BX51 or BX61 microscope and the DOTSLIDE program (Olympus, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands). The Göttingen, Barcelona and Bochum embryos were scanned with a Zeiss Axioscan Z1 (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Jena, Germany). Digital images of serial sections from the Carnegie collection were obtained via the Virtual Human Embryo Project (http://virtualhumanembryo.lsuhsc.edu). All images were converted into greyscale “JPEG” format and loaded into the Amira reconstruction program (version 2020.2; base package; FEI Visualization Sciences Group Europe, Merignac Cedex, France). The greyscale images were aligned automatically with the least‐squares alignment mode and then manually adjusted for the correct curvature of the embryonic body axis with the help of photographs and magnetic resonance images of human embryos of the same age (Pooh et al., 2011). Structures of interest were segmented manually and reconstructed three‐dimensionally with the Amira program. Small deformations of individual sections due to the histological processing and stepwise stacking of sections can confer a distracting noise on the 3D reconstructions. Therefore, polygon meshes from all reconstructed materials were exported via “vrml export” from Amira to Cinema4D (MAXON Computer GmbH, Friedrichsdorf, Germany) and remodelled using the Amira model as template (Figure S1). The accuracy of the remodelling process was safeguarded by the simultaneous visualization of the original output from Amira in Cinema4D and the remodelled Cinema model. The Cinema4D models were transferred via “wrl export” to Adobe Acrobat version 9 (https://www.adobe.com) to generate interactive 3D Portable Device Format (PDF) files, which are an easily accessible format for 3D visualization.

All epithelia were segmented following their basement membrane. Muscles become first detectable as dense mesenchymal masses and are identifiable initially only by their location. When muscle fibres develop, segmentation of different muscles can be challenging as long as perimysia are not yet well‐developed. The perineal skin of embryos and foetuses is referred to as the skin surrounding the pelvic outlets of the urogenital and intestinal tracts. The umbilical ring is located at the junction of the belly with the umbilical cord. Please note that the infraumbilical ventral abdominal wall of the embryo only begins to form in the 7‐week‐old embryo (Mekonen et al., 2015).

In addition to the Figures, the evidence for our descriptions can be inspected in the corresponding interactive 3D‐PDFs (Figures [Link], [Link]). The reader is, therefore, encouraged to read the text and inspect the corresponding interactive PDFs simultaneously. This is because their rotational options (“live” images) allow a much better understanding of the complex local topography than do “still” images and text. The 3D‐PDFs can also be used to identify or verify the identity of a structure in a Figure: after opening and positioning the reconstruction similar to the view in the Figure, marking or unmarking a structure in the model tree will link the image to a name.

2.3. Measurements

Volume measurements were performed with the statistical analysis mode in Amira. The length of structures was measured with the spline option in Cinema4D.

2.4. Orientation

The body axis is defined as the axis passing through the thoracal and lumbar vertebral column and is assumed to be perpendicular to the transverse plane. To describe (changes in) the position of a structure relative to another structure or an observer, we use the terms cranial or caudal (which are equivalent to superior or inferior) for differences in position along the body axis and ventral or dorsal (equivalent to anterior or posterior) and left or right to indicate (changes in) position perpendicular to the body axis. To obtain an inside view of the pelvic floor, oblique “inside‐out” views were often necessary.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Definition of the perineal region and its contents

In the present study, we investigated the developmental changes in the skin of the perineal region and the underlying external genitals of female human embryos and foetuses. The perineal region is delimited by the pelvic outlet and pelvic floor cranially, and the outlets of the urogenital and intestinal tracts and their surrounding skin caudally. The components in the perineal space of embryos and foetuses include the skin, the phallus (clitoris) with its glans and hood, the cavernous and spongy bodies, and the associated cutaneous muscles and nerves. These components all lie caudal to the pubococcygeal line (interrupted horizontal line, Figure 2), which reflects the position of the pelvic floor in adult women (Betschart et al., 2013). Striking features are that the dorsally situated structures (sacrum and rectum) maintain their orientation relative to the pubococcygeal line between 8 and 15 weeks, whereas the plane through the bladder and allantois relative to the pubococcygeal line gradually increases from −45° at 8 weeks to +45° at 11 weeks of development and later (Figure 2). The 15‐week foetus is the most advanced stage of which we could reconstruct the sacral and coccygeal vertebrae since the vertebral column is absent in the tissue block of the 20‐week foetus. The bladder, therefore, aligns its position with that of the rectum and sacrum between 8 and 11 weeks of development. This change in orientation occurs concurrently with the development of the infra‐umbilical ventral abdominal body wall starting at 7 weeks (Ji et al., 2020; Mekonen et al., 2015) and the return of the herniated midgut into the peritoneal cavity at 9.5 weeks (Kakeya et al., 2022; Soffers et al., 2015). Of note, the urethra and adjacent pubic bone did not change their position during this period. Another striking but temporary feature in the period shown in Figure 2 is the almost perpendicular position of the 2nd and following coccygeal vertebrae relative to the sacral vertebrae.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The position of the pelvic organs relative to the sacrum and the pubococcygeal line between 8 and 15 weeks of development. The pubococcygeal line is the interrupted black horizontal line that extends from the caudal border of the symphysis to the coccygeal tip. Note that the position of the hindgut/rectum relative to the vertebral column hardly changes, whereas the position of the Müllerian‐duct derivatives, bladder and umbilical ring align themselves with that of the hindgut/rectum and sacrum between 8 and 11 weeks. The Müllerian‐duct derivatives are represented by the thin tubes between the bladder/urethra and the hindgut/rectum. The glans (light blue) and cavernous bodies (blue) of the clitoris and the caudal part of the urogenital sinus are also included. The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

3.2. Appearance and fate of the “thick” perineal skin

At 6 weeks of development (CS18), the skin in the perineal region increases in thickness (Kruepunga et al., 2018). At this stage, the skin consists of basal, intermediate and periderm layers (Figure S2). The layer of thick skin in the perineal area differs from the skin outside this region in that its intermediate layer is at least 2‐fold thicker (Figure S2b,c). The thick perineal skin in a 6‐weeks‐old embryo extends between the two legs laterally and between the umbilical ring and the tip of the coccyx craniocaudally (orange‐coloured area in Figure 3a). Although the thick‐skin region continues to increase between 6 and 15 weeks of development (Figure 3g), the fraction of the perineal surface covered with thick skin declines due to a faster growth of surrounding “regular” skin (Figure 3a–f). From 9 weeks onward, areas of thick skin gradually transform to standard skin. This “thinning” of the thick epithelial layer of the skin is first seen at the cranial base of the clitoris and extends distally along the entire dorsal side of the clitoris and outer labial swellings (Figure 3c–f). At 11 weeks of development, the thick skin between the anus and urogenital outlet narrows, which results in separate peri‐urogenital and peri‐anal areas of thick skin at 15 weeks (Figure 3f). At 20 weeks of development, thick skin remains present in the vaginal vestibule and the anal canal only. The epithelial double layer between the prepuce and the glans cannot be distinguished from the thick skin at the tip of the clitoris.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

The topographic distribution of the thick perineal (orange) and standard skin (peach) between 6 and 15 weeks of development. Panels (a)–(f) show frontal views of the caudal region of the body. Note that the genital tubercle (precursor of the clitoris) localizes directly adjacent to the umbilical ring in panel (a) (asterisk). In panel (b), the ventral abdominal wall has just begun to form (double‐headed arrow) and is not covered with thick skin. Panel (g) shows the developmental increase in size of the thick‐skin area (measured for convenience as a volume with a standard thickness; note the logarithmic scale of Y‐axis). The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

3.3. Appearance and size of the labia majora

At 7 weeks of development (CS20), the swellings of the labia majora start to emerge on both sides of the clitoris (LM in Figure 4a,b). At 10 weeks, the labial swellings have produced a deep furrow between them and the clitoris. While “standard” skin covers the protruding parts of the labial swellings, the skin in the furrows remains “thick” (Figure 4c,e, and black arrowheads in panels (d) and (f)). At 20 weeks, the thick skin has also disappeared from this furrow, so that the labia majora are covered with “standard” skin only.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

The labia majora at 7, 10 and 12 weeks of development. Panels (a, c and e) show caudal views of the labia majora, while panels (b, d and f) show histological sections at the levels indicated by the interrupted black lines in panels (a, c and e). The asterisks in panels (a, c and e) identify the labia minora, which are first identifiable as skin folds at 7 weeks of development. Black arrowheads point to areas of thick skin in panels (d, f). *Labia minora. The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

3.4. Development of the cavernous bodies, glans and prepuce of the clitoris

The mesenchymal condensation of the cavernous bodies and the glans of the clitoris could first be recognized at ~7 weeks of development (CS20; Figure 5a,e). Initially, they are part of a larger mesenchymal mass in the region of the pelvic floor, from which local bones and striated muscles also form. However, the contour of the cavernous bodies and glans can already be recognized in the upper part of this mesenchyme (Figure 5a). At 9 weeks, the glans has become a separate structure at the distal end of the clitoris (Figure 5b, b1). Although not far apart, the dense part of the glans and the cavernous bodies remain separate structures throughout subsequent development (Figure 5f–h). Between 15 and 20 weeks of development, the dense mesenchyme of the glans persists as an outer, cortical layer only (white arrowhead in Figure 5h1), while the inner, medullar part transforms into a looser mesenchyme (black star, Figure 5h1). The cavernous bodies retain a common part near the glans but separate more proximally in the shaft of the clitoris (the crura (C) in Figure S3a–c), with only loose connective tissue connecting them (arrowheads in Figure S3d–f).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The glans and cavernous bodies of the clitoris at 7, 9, 13 and ~ 20 weeks of development. Panels (a–d) show left‐sided views and panels (e–h) the corresponding histological sections, with the cavernous bodies delineated in dark blue, and the glans in light blue. Note that at 7 weeks the mesenchymal mass includes not only the glans and the cavernous bodies but also their crura (panel (a)). The pink‐coloured plane on the lateral side of the cavernous bodies (asterisks in panels (a, e)) identifies the connection with subcutaneous dense mesenchyme. From 9 weeks onwards, the cavernous bodies and glans are separate structures (panels b1 and f–h). At 20 weeks the glans mesenchyme consists of a denser cortical layer (white arrowhead) and a looser medullar (black star) region (panel h1). The crura of the cavernous bodies are positioned underneath the pubic bones (panels c1 (only the right pubic bone is shown) and f). The elevation of the mons pubis (MP) is indicated with a double‐headed orange arrow in panel (g). The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

3.4.1. “Disappearance” of the clitoris

Both the clitoris and the labia majora extend ventrally at a similar rate between 7 and 15 weeks of development, but thereafter the labia do not protrude further ventrally (Figure 6). At ~9 weeks, the legs (crura) of the cavernous bodies at the base of the clitoris extend dorsally under the arch of the pubic bones (Figure 5c1 and f). Due to the lengthening of the crura it appears that the cavernous bodies bend between the body and the crura. At the same time, the clitoris disappears between both labia majora (Figure 6ae). The impression of a disappearing clitoris is accounted for by the 50% decline in its length between 15 and 20 weeks (Figure 6d,e) and is further enhanced by the simultaneously increasing protuberance of the mons pubis in front of the pubic bone (yellow double‐headed arrow in Figure 5g and graph in Figure 6f).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

The growth of the clitoris and labia majora. Panels (a–d) show left lateral views of the clitoris and labia majora between 7 and ~ 20 weeks of development. In panels (a, d) the contours of the cavernous bodies (dark blue) and glans (light blue) within the clitoris are shown. Note that the shaft of the clitoris appears to bend caudally after ~12 weeks and that its dorsoventral length decreases relative to the labia majora between 15 and 20 weeks. Length was measured relative to the position of the inguinal fold as shown in panel (b). The blue arrow represents the length of the clitoris and the green arrow the length (height) of the labia majora. Panel (e) depicts the outcome of these measurements. Panel (f) shows that the elevation of the mons pubis increases ~5‐fold between 11 and 20 weeks of development, indicating it also contributes to the decreasing visibility of the clitoris. Its elevation was measured as the shortest distance between the symphysis and the skin (see yellow line in Figure 5g). The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

3.4.2. Formation of the prepuce

The clitoral prepuce or hood is a skin fold that unrolls as a collar around the glans of the clitoris. The formation of the prepuce starts at ~10 weeks on the dorsum of the glans near the common distal part of both cavernous bodies (Figure 7a,b). The prepuce gradually extends distally over the glans (arrows in Figure 7a,b; compare with Figure 7c,d) and covers it completely by ~15 weeks (Figure 7e,f). The epithelium between the glans and prepuce is a solid sheet of thick skin (“lamella” (Deibert, 1933); black arrowheads in panels (f)), with local accumulations of epithelium, the so‐called “pearls” (Deibert, 1933) or “whorls” ((van der Putte & Sie‐Go, 2011); white arrowhead in panel (f)). The epithelial sheet between the glans and the prepuce is still intact at ~20 weeks of development (Figure 7g,h; black arrowheads in panel (h)) and still carries an epithelial tag on the apex of the glans (Figure 7h).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

The development of the prepuce. Panels (a, e) show left‐sided views, (c) a caudal view and (g) a left dorsal view of the clitoris and its surrounding structures. The white asterisk in panel (a) indicates the epithelial tag at the end of the urethral plate. The hatched lines in panels (a, e) show the position of the transverse (panels b and f), frontal (d) and sagittal sections (h), respectively. At 10 weeks of development, the preputial collar starts to extend distally over the glans (arrows in panels a, b). The collar has extended over 60%–70% of the glans in panel (d) and over almost the entire glans at 12 weeks (double‐headed green arrows in panels f, h). Note the abundance of nerves dorsal to the cavernous bodies at 10 weeks (yellow arrowheads in panel b). In panel (e), the skin and the preputial mesenchyme (green) were removed from the left side of the clitoris to expose the clitoral midline. The glandular lamella, a single layer of skin epithelium (black arrowheads in panels f, h) supported on both sides by a basement membrane, separates the glans and prepuce (double‐headed green arrow). The white arrowhead in panel (f) identifies an epithelial “pearl” in the glandular lamella (van der Putte & Sie‐Go, 2011). The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

3.5. Development of the labia minora

The labia minora (“lesser lips”) are skin folds between both labia majora that surround the urogenital exit. The labia minora become identifiable at 7 weeks of development as a skinfold covered with thick skin that surrounds the urogenital outlet (asterisk in Figure 4a). They are ventrolaterally continuous with the prepuce and ventromedially with the apex of the cavernous body. In the 8th week, the labia minora become ridges around the exit of the vaginal vestibule that remain covered with thick epithelium until at least 15 weeks of development (Figure 8) and are filled with dense mesenchyme (asterisks and dark green‐coded structure in Figure 9b, b1 and e). The transition of a dense to a loose mesenchymal organization demarcates the boundary between the labia minora and prepuce (Figure 9f; Figure S4). The urethral plate occupies the ventral midline of the vestibule and the caudal boundary of the glans (Figure S4). The labia minora (asterisks in Figure 7f) and the cavernous bodies (CB) are connected by the so‐called frenulum of the clitoris (“Fr” in Figure 7f), which becomes identifiable at ~12 weeks. After the disappearance of thick skin from the area between the urogenital sinus and anus (Figure 8a), the dorsoventral lengths of the labia majora and the vaginal vestibule continue to increase, but that of the labia minora does not (Figures 8, 10). Consequently, the labia minora border cover only the ventral ~50% of the vaginal vestibule at 14 weeks and the ventral ~30% at 20 weeks (Figures 8a, 10a). This reduction suggests that the craniocaudal growth of the vestibule and the labia majora exceeds that of the labia minora. Only the internal rim of the labia minora remains covered with thick stratified perineal skin (pink), whereas stratified squamous endoderm (brown) now covers the rest of the medial side (Figure 10a,c). At 20 weeks, both the standard and thick‐skin areas have developed a parakeratinized surface layer (Figure 10b,c).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

The epithelia of the vaginal vestibule at ~ 14 weeks of development. Panel (a) shows a caudal view of the vulva. Panel (c) shows a left‐sided view of the vaginal vestibule with the midline contours of the urethra (U), vagina (V), glans clitoridis (GC) and prepuce (P) delineated by black, light‐blue or light‐green dotted lines, respectively. Panels b1‐3 show frontal sections at the positions indicated by interrupted lines in panels (a, c). Section #1 passes through the glans (GC), #2 through the labia minora (asterisks) and #3 only through the vestibule and labia majora. The white arrowheads indicate the boundary between thick perineal skin and endoderm. Note the developing urethral papilla protruding into the endodermal roof of the vestibule (arrows in panels b1‐3). The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

The development of the labia minora and their extension into the perineal region. Panels (a, b) show inside‐out left dorsocranial views, whereas panels a1 and b1 show outside‐in ventrocaudal views of the perineal region of the same embryos. Standard and thick skin are coded by peach and orange, respectively. The inside‐out views show the mesenchyme in the prepuce (bright green), the glans (grey‐blue) and the labia minora (dark green). The labia minora are not yet visible in the 6‐week‐old embryo (panel a) but appear in 8‐week‐old embryos as ridges filled with dense mesenchyme (white asterisks on dark green structure in panels b and b1) that border the vaginal vestibule. Panels (c, d) are inside‐out views of 12‐ and 15‐week‐old foetuses, respectively. Note that loose preputial mesenchyme (bright green) marks the ventral border of the dense labial mesenchyme, whereas the dorsal end of the dense labial mesenchyme extends towards (C) or has reached (D) the anal outlet. Panels (e, f) show histological sections of 8‐ and 12‐week‐old foetuses. At 8 weeks, dense labial mesenchyme (asterisks) fills the labia. In the 12‐week foetus this dense labial mesenchyme (*) abuts the loose preputial mesenchyme (P). Note that the frenulum (Fr, panel f) originates in the common distal portion of the cavernous bodies (CB) and extends to the mesenchyme of the labia minora. Further note that in panel (f) the dense mesenchyme of the cavernous bodies (CB) and that of the glandular cortex (GC) are not continuous. The fold between the labia majora and minora is still covered with thick skin (#). The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 10

The epithelia of the vaginal vestibule at ~ 20 weeks of development. Panel (a) shows a caudal view of the vulva. Panel (c) shows left‐sided views of the vaginal vestibule with the midline contours of the urethra (U), vagina (V), glans clitoridis (GC) and prepuce (P) delineated by black, light‐blue or light‐green dotted lines, respectively. Panel (b) shows schematic outlines of frontal sections (derived from the reconstruction of the sagittally sectioned 20‐weeks foetus) at the positions indicated by interrupted lines in panels (a, c). In panel (b), standard skin is represented by a light pink‐coloured line and thick skin by a dark pink‐coloured line. Section #1 passes through the glans (GC), #2 through the labia minora (asterisks) and #3 only through the vestibule and labia majora. Note that both the standard skin (light pink) and the thick skin on the medial side of the labia majora (dark pink) of the 20‐week‐old foetus parakeratinizes. The scale bars correspond to 1 mm.

4. DISCUSSION

We studied the development and growth of the external genitals of female human embryos and foetuses between 6 and ~ 20 weeks of development and observed that the development and distribution of the perineal thick skin corresponded with that of the subcutaneous perineal organs, including the external genitals, anal canal and cutaneous muscles. This correspondence suggests these structures share a dependence on the programming window of the sexual phenotype.

4.1. Programming window of the sexual phenotype

The external genitals and anus acquire their typically female appearance during the “masculinization programming period” between ~8 and ~14 weeks of development, although our measurements show that the phenotypic sex differences continue to become more pronounced until at least ~20 weeks. The masculinization programming period is associated with a rising production of androgenic steroid hormones in male foetuses (Connan‐Perrot et al., 2021; Siiteri & Wilson, 1974; Wilson et al., 1981). The anogenital distance is a lifelong readout of this sex‐dependent transient exposure of male and female foetuses to androgenic steroid hormones (Fowler et al., 2016; Sharpe, 2020). The increase in the anogenital distance is more rapid and more pronounced in male than in female foetuses (Politzer, 1932), but the perineal length also increases in female foetuses, growing ~2‐fold faster between 8 and 11 weeks than between 11 and 20 weeks (Figure 8 in (Hülsman et al., 2025)). Ultrasound measurements in live foetuses were only carried out in the latter period thus far (Fowler et al., 2016). The typically female structures in the perineal region (labia majora and minora, clitoris, urethral plate, vaginal vestibule and perineum) all start to differentiate and assume a female phenotype between 8 and ~15 weeks of development. The acquisition of the typically female phenotype, therefore, coincides with the masculinization programming period but does not seem to merely represent the default phenotype. Hence, it would be better to describe this period as the “sexual‐phenotype programming period”, since masculinization may only represent a quantitative aspect of this period.

4.2. Partial “descent” of pelvic organs into the perineal space

The developing vaginal vestibule and anal canal descend substantially below the pubococcygeal line, which identifies the level of the pelvic floor (Betschart et al., 2013). This change in position of pelvic organs starts at ~9 weeks of development and continues up to at least 15 weeks. The “descent” of the pelvic organs was previously reported to continue until birth (Tagaki, 1927) and probably is an important determinant of the typical funnel‐shaped appearance of the pelvic floor.

4.3. Thick perineal skin corresponds with the sex hormone‐sensitive area

A striking feature of the 6th week of development is the appearance of a pericloacal area with a selective thickening of the intermediate layer of the skin. In mammalian, including human embryos, a transient midline ridge of epithelial cells, the “Schwanzleiste”, arises caudally from the cloaca at 4 weeks of development, extends towards the tail tip and then regresses in reverse order at 4.5 weeks (Landolt, 1959). The same structure was identified as the “caudal ectodermal ridge” and shown to be a transient component of the ring of thick epithelium that encircles the lateral surface of the embryo (O'Rahilly & Müller, 1985). The early, midline appearance, the lack of cell layers in this thickened skin, and its brief presence seem to rule out a connection with the perineal thick skin described in the present study. As far as we are aware, therefore, the characteristic thickening of the intermediate layer of the ectodermal epithelium in the pericloacal skin was not reported earlier. We first noted this thick skin between both legs laterally, the umbilical cord cranially, and the base of the coccyx caudally at 6 weeks of development (Kruepunga et al., 2018). The thick skin area becomes restricted gradually to the urogenital and anal exits, where it persists in the superficial part of the vaginal vestibule and in the anal canal. The thick skin area around the urogenital exit roughly corresponds with the dihydrotestosterone‐sensitive pubic area (Imperato‐McGinley et al., 1974; Overland et al., 2016; Zouboulis et al., 2007), but its perianal counterpart has thus far not been associated with functional properties. Johnson (1914) mentioned the thick skin as the epithelium covering the anal canal but did not mention its extension over the perianal or pericloacal area. Although the function of thick skin in human embryos is unknown, in general, non‐cornified thick skin areas in foetal rodents seem to be more permeable to chemicals than thinner, cornified skin epithelia (Hardman et al., 1998).

It is tempting to compare the thick perineal skin with the anogenital swellings of female old‐world monkeys and some primates (Nunn, 1999). These swellings, which change in size during the ovarian cycle, have evolved independently in three separate primate lineages at the same anatomical location. Unfortunately, little is known about their development, except that they form at the location of the labia majora when Macaque foetuses pass through the sexual programming period (Dang, 1978). The labia majora are a genital skin region that is exquisitely sensitive to sex hormones (Imperato‐McGinley et al., 1974). This location and the appearance of the swellings in three independent primate lineages (Nunn, 1999) suggest, therefore, a strong predisposition. Unfortunately, this feature has not yet been studied developmentally.

4.4. Glans and cavernous bodies become separate structures

The shape of the connective tissue core of the emerging clitoris resembles that of a paper airplane (see Figure 5a,e). The initially single mesenchymal mass soon divides into a smaller ventral part, the clitoral glans, and a larger dorsal part, the cavernous bodies. The wings will transform, starting at 8 weeks of development, into the crura of the cavernous bodies, while the frenulum of the clitoris will form the connection between the apical, non‐divided part of the cavernous bodies and the base of the prepuce of the glans. The clitoral frenulum becomes identifiable at ~12 weeks. The structure was already described almost 90 years ago as bilateral (Popper, 1937) but is nowadays usually described as a midline structure (Clerico et al., 2017; Pauls, 2015). Although the glans of the clitoris and the cavernous bodies have a common mesenchymal origin, they become separate structures early in their development. Our findings in this respect differ from the schematic drawings presented by Puppo (e.g. Figure 9 in (Puppo & Puppo, 2015)).

4.5. Angular growth of the clitoris

Both the clitoris and the labia majora initially grow in ventral direction, but especially the declining growth of the clitoris slows down its ventral extension to reach an apparent dorsoventral length of ~2.5 mm at ~13 weeks (Figure 6) or 3.1 mm at 14 weeks (Ozguner et al., 2017), compared to 6.5–6.8 mm at birth (Adekoya et al., 2021; Ozguner et al., 2017). The decline in the ventral extension of the clitoris results from the formation of a caudal bend (“angle”) in its shaft (compare Figure 6a–c). This bend does not develop in the foetal penis, so that its presence or absence, known as the “sagittal sign”, can be used to distinguish males and females externally after ~10 weeks (Emerson et al., 1989; Mazza et al., 2001). The apparent decline in dorsoventral length of the clitoris between 15 and 20 weeks of development reveals that this angle continues to become more acute. In rare cases, the bending and possibly also the slowdown in clitoral growth is delayed by 8–12 weeks, so that the clitoris continues to protrude ventrally from between the labia majora until 22–26 weeks of development (“clitoromegaly”; Zimmer et al., 2012). In the spotted hyena, the entire ensemble of external genitals differentiates permanently in a near masculine way with a straight clitoris, whereas the internal genitals remain female in phenotype (Cunha et al., 2005). The mechanism inducing the caudal bending of the clitoris remains unknown but most likely resides in the bend between the shaft and the crura of the cavernous bodies. Irrespective of the mechanism, the outcome is that the labia majora largely covers the clitoris.

4.6. Clitoral hood is a skin fold that edges over the glans

The development of the prepuce or clitoral hood was described accurately already in 1937 (Popper, 1937). The prepuce begins to form at ~10 weeks of development and extends the next 4 weeks as a fold of tissue over the glans, starting dorsally. The inner surfaces of the prepuce and glans adhere mutually at first, the adhesion resembling a thick epithelial lamella. Mechanistically, the forming of the female and the male prepuce (Hunter, 1935; Liu et al., 2018) appear to be very similar.

4.7. Labia minora are initially short

The labia minora become identifiable at 7 weeks of development as bilateral ridges covered with the thick ectodermal epithelium that border the urogenital exit ventrolaterally. This thick epithelium is clearly visible in, e.g. Plate 2 of (Glenister, 1954) and Figure 3 of (Bulmer, 1959), but was not commented upon. The labia minora are continuous ventrolaterally with the clitoral hood and ventromedially with the frenulum of the clitoris and the apex of the cavernous body. The size of the labia minora and their ventral connections (frenulum and clitoral hood) varies substantially (Clerico et al., 2017). The labia minora cover only the ventral ~50% of the vaginal vestibule at 14 weeks and the ventral ~30% at 20 weeks (Figure 10), which suggests that the dorsoventral growth of the vestibule exceeds that of the labia minora. This observation seems in line with old illustrations (e.g. 11–18 week‐old foetuses in (Mijsberg, 1924)), and a recent conclusion that the labia minora are short in young girls (Wroblewska‐Seniuk et al., 2021).

5. CONCLUSION

This study generated a detailed 3D‐atlas of the development of the perineal area of female embryos and foetuses between 6 and 20 weeks of development. Our findings show that within the programming period of the sexual phenotype, the hormone‐sensitive areas of perineal thick skin and external genitals and anal canal develop. This perineal thick skin remains present on the borders of the labia minora and in the anal canal. These findings indicate a relation between the development of the perineal thick skin, the external genitals and the anal canal.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

C.H. participated in data collection, analysis and visualization, wrote the manuscript and was responsible for formatting the figures. G.M. participated in the visualization of the structures in 3D. H.G., N.K., S.E.K and J.H. participated in the data analysis and interpretation and edited the manuscript. W.H.L. conceived the study and supervised the interpretation of the data and the preparation of the manuscript.

Supporting information

Figure S1.

JOA-246-190-s002.tif (10MB, tif)

Figure S2.

JOA-246-190-s016.tif (18.6MB, tif)

Figure S3.

JOA-246-190-s005.tif (23.5MB, tif)

Figure S4.

JOA-246-190-s008.tif (6.1MB, tif)

Figure S5.

JOA-246-190-s015.pdf (3.9MB, pdf)

Figure S6.

JOA-246-190-s009.pdf (3.5MB, pdf)

Figure S7.

JOA-246-190-s012.pdf (6.8MB, pdf)

Figure S8.

JOA-246-190-s004.pdf (7.7MB, pdf)

Figure S9.

JOA-246-190-s001.pdf (5.8MB, pdf)

Figure S10.

JOA-246-190-s003.pdf (10.5MB, pdf)

Figure S11.

JOA-246-190-s006.pdf (7.7MB, pdf)

Figure S12.

JOA-246-190-s013.pdf (11.2MB, pdf)

Figure S13.

JOA-246-190-s007.pdf (9.9MB, pdf)

Figure S14.

JOA-246-190-s010.pdf (4.1MB, pdf)

Figure S15.

JOA-246-190-s011.pdf (15.5MB, pdf)

Figure S16.

JOA-246-190-s014.pdf (14.4MB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs Maurice van den Hoff (AMC), Marco de Ruiter (LUMC), Annelieke Schepens (RadboudMC), Christoph Viebahn (Göttingen) and Beate Brand‐Saberi (Bochum) for allowing us to use their institutional series of human embryos and foetuses. We further thank Dr John Cork (New Orleans) for making additional digitized sections of the Virtual Human Embryo project available to us. We also thank our bachelor students, who contributed to this study as part of their academic internship. The financial support of “Stichting Rijp” is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks go to Els Terwindt (Maastricht University) for technical assistance.

Hülsman, C.J.M. , Gao, H. , Kruepunga, N. , Mommen, G.M.C. , Köhler, S.E. , Hikspoors, J.P.J.M. et al. (2025) The development of the external genitals in female human embryos and foetuses. Part 1: Perineal thick skin, clitoris and labia. Journal of Anatomy, 246, 190–204. Available from: 10.1111/joa.14139

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data is original data and can be shared.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdulcadir, J. , Dewaele, R. , Firmenich, N. , Remuinan, J. , Petignat, P. , Botsikas, D. et al. (2020) In vivo imaging‐based 3‐dimensional pelvic prototype models to improve education regarding sexual anatomy and physiology. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 17(9), 1590–1602. Available from: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adekoya, A.O. , Fetuga, M.B. , Chanoine, J.‐P. , Adekoya, A.O. & Ajibola, E.D. (2021) Comparative analysis of neonatal clitoral length measurement using calliper versus spatula. Annals of Health Research, 7(1), 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartosch, C. , Vilar, I. , Rodrigues, M. , Costa, L. , Botelho, N. & Brandao, O. (2019) Fetal autopsy parameters standards: biometry, organ weights, and long bone lengths. Virchows Archiv, 475(4), 499–511. Available from: 10.1007/s00428-019-02639-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Betschart, C. , Chen, L. , Ashton‐Miller, J.A. & Delancey, J.O. (2013) On pelvic reference lines and the MR evaluation of genital prolapse: a proposal for standardization using the pelvic inclination correction system. International Urogynecology Journal, 24(9), 1421–1428. Available from: 10.1007/s00192-013-2100-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bulmer, D. (1959) The epithelium of the urogenital sinus in female human foetuses. Journal of Anatomy, 93(Pt 4), 491–498. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Clerico, C. , Lari, A. , Mojallal, A. & Boucher, F. (2017) Anatomy and aesthetics of the labia Minora: the ideal vulva? Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 41(3), 714–719. Available from: 10.1007/s00266-017-0831-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Connan‐Perrot, S. , Leger, T. , Lelandais, P. , Desdoits‐Lethimonier, C. , David, A. , Fowler, P.A. et al. (2021) Six decades of research on human fetal gonadal steroids. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22, 6681. Available from: 10.3390/ijms22136681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cunha, G.R. , Place, N.J. , Baskin, L. , Conley, A. , Weldele, M. , Cunha, T.J. et al. (2005) The ontogeny of the urogenital system of the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta Erxleben). Biology of Reproduction, 73(3), 554–564. Available from: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.041129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dang, D.C. (1978) Sexual differentiation of the external genital organs of the Macaca fascicularis fetus. Annales de Biologie Animale Biochimie Biophysique, 18(3), 681–687. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deibert, G.A. (1933) The separation of the prepuce in the human penis. The Anatomical Record, 57(4), 387–399. [Google Scholar]
  11. Drumm, J.E. , Clinch, J. & MacKenzie, G. (1976) The ultrasonic measurement of fetal crown‐rump length as a method of assessing gestational age. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 83(6), 417–421. Available from: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00856.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Emerson, D.S. , Felker, R.E. & Brown, D.L. (1989) The sagittal sign. An early second trimester sonographic indicator of fetal gender. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 8, 293–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fowler, P.A. , Filis, P. , Bhattacharya, S. , le Bizec, B. , Antignac, J.P. , Morvan, M.L. et al. (2016) Human anogenital distance: an update on fetal smoke‐exposure and integration of the perinatal literature on sex differences. Human Reproduction, 31(2), 463–472. Available from: 10.1093/humrep/dev323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Glenister, T.W. (1954) The origin and fate of the urethral plate in man. Journal of Anatomy, 88(3), 413–425. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guirgis, R.R. , Alshawaf, T. , Dave, R. & Craft, I.L. (1993) Transvaginal crown‐rump length measurements of 224 successful pregnancies which resulted from gamete intra‐fallopian transfer or in‐vitro fertilization. Human Reproduction, 8(11), 1933–1937. Available from: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hülsman, C.J.M. , Gao, H. , Kruepunga, N. , Mommen, G.M.C. , Köhler, S.E. , Hikspoors, J.P.J.M. et al. (2025) The development of the external genitals in female human embryos and foetuses. Part 2: Vaginal vestibule, anal canal, perineal raphe, and perineal subcutaneous muscles. Journal of Anatomy, 246, 205–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hamilton, W.J. & Mossman, H.W. (1972) Hamilton, Boyd and Mossman's human embryology: prenatal development of form and function, 4th edition. Cambridge: W. Heffer & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hansen, K. , Sung, C.J. , Huang, C. , Pinar, H. , Singer, D.B. & Oyer, C.E. (2003) Reference values for second trimester fetal and neonatal organ weights and measurements. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 6(2), 160–167. Available from: 10.1007/s10024-002-1117-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hardman, M.J. , Sisi, P. , Banbury, D.N. & Byrne, C. (1998) Patterned acquisition of skin barrier function during development. Development, 125(8), 1541–1552. Available from: 10.1242/dev.125.8.1541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haylen, B.T. , Fischer, G. , Vu, D. & Tse, K. (2017) The vaginal vestibule: assessing the case for an anterior and posterior division. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 36(4), 979–983. Available from: 10.1002/nau.23064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hunter, R.H. (1935) Notes on the development of the prepuce. Journal of Anatomy, 70(1), 68–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Imperato‐McGinley, J. , Guerrero, L. , Gautier, T. & Peterson, R.E. (1974) Steroid 5alpha‐reductase deficiency in man: an inherited form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Science, 186(4170), 1213–1215. Available from: 10.1126/science.186.4170.1213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jakobovits, A. , Iffy, L. , Wingate, M.B. , Slate, W.G. , Chatterton, R.T., Jr. & Kerner, P. (1972) The rate of early fetal growth in the human subject. Acta Anatomica (Basel), 83(1), 50–59. Available from: 10.1159/000143845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ji, X. , Ishikawa, A. , Nagata, A. , Yamada, S. , Imai, H. , Matsuda, T. et al. (2020) Relationship between rectal abdominis muscle position and physiological umbilical herniation and return: a morphological and morphometric study. The Anatomical Record (Hoboken), 303(12), 3044–3051. Available from: 10.1002/ar.24358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Johnson, F.P. (1914) The development of the rectum in the human embryo. The American Journal of Anatomy, 16(1), 1–57. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kakeya, M. , Matsubayashi, J. , Kanahashi, T. , Männer, J. , Yamada, S. & Takakuwa, T. (2022) The return process of physiological umbilical herniation in human fetuses: the possible role of the vascular tree and umbilical ring. Journal of Anatomy, 241(3), 846–859. Available from: 10.1111/joa.13720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kruepunga, N. , Hikspoors, J. , Mekonen, H.K. , Mommen, G.M.C. , Meemon, K. , Weerachatyanukul, W. et al. (2018) The development of the cloaca in the human embryo. Journal of Anatomy, 233(6), 724–739. Available from: 10.1111/joa.12882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Landolt, A.M. (1959) Über eine ektodermale Leiste des Schwanzes menschlicher Embryonen. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 121(4), 337–347. Available from: 10.1007/BF00525452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, X. , Liu, G. , Shen, J. , Yue, A. , Isaacson, D. , Sinclair, A. et al. (2018) Human glans and preputial development. Differentiation, 103, 86–99. Available from: 10.1016/j.diff.2018.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Loughna, P. , Chitty, L. , Evans, T. & Chudleigh, T. (2009) Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound, 17(3), 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  31. Macgregor, S.N. , Tamura, R.K. , Sabbagha, R.E. , Minoque, J.P. , Gibson, D.E. & Hoffman, D.I. (1987) Underestimation of gestational age by conventional crown‐rump length dating curves. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 70(3), 344–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maroun, L.L. & Graem, N. (2005) Autopsy standards of body parameters and fresh organ weights in nonmacerated and macerated human fetuses. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, 8(2), 204–217. Available from: 10.1007/s10024-004-7084-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mazza, V. , Falcinelli, C. , Paganelli, S. , Contu, G. , Mantuano, S.M. , Battafarano, S.D. et al. (2001) Sonographic early fetal gender assignment: a longitudinal study in pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 17(6), 513–516. Available from: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00421.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mekonen, H.K. , Hikspoors, J.P. , Mommen, G. , Kohler, S.E. & Lamers, W.H. (2015) Development of the ventral body wall in the human embryo. Journal of Anatomy, 227(5), 673–685. Available from: 10.1111/joa.12380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mijsberg, W.A. (1924) Über die Entwicklung der Vagina, des Hymen und des Sinus urogenitalis beim Menschen. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 74(4), 684–760. Available from: 10.1007/BF02117083 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nunn, C.L. (1999) The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded‐signal hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 58(2), 229–246. Available from: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. O'Connell, H.E. , Anderson, C.R. , Plenter, R.J. & Hutson, J.M. (2004) The clitoris: a unified structure. Histology of the clitoral glans, body, crura and bulbs. Urodinamica, 14(2), 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  38. O'Rahilly, R. & Müller, F. (1985) The origin of the ectodermal ring in staged human embryos of the first 5 weeks. Acta Anatomica (Basel), 122(3), 145–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. O'Rahilly, R. & Muller, F. (2010) Developmental stages in human embryos: revised and new measurements. Cells, Tissues, Organs, 192(2), 73–84. Available from: 10.1159/000289817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Overland, M. , Li, Y. , Cao, M. , Shen, J. , Yue, X. , Botta, S. et al. (2016) Canalization of the vestibular plate in the absence of urethral fusion characterizes development of the human clitoris: the single zipper hypothesis. The Journal of Urology, 195(4 Pt 2), 1275–1283. Available from: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.07.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ozguner, G. , Ozturk, K. , Bilkay, C. , Dursun, A. , Sulak, O. & Koyuncu, E. (2017) Appearance of external genital organs and types of hymen in Turkish female foetal cadavers. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(2), 215–222. Available from: 10.1080/01443615.2016.1233945 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Papageorghiou, A.T. , Kennedy, S.H. , Salomon, L.J. , Ohuma, E.O. , Cheikh Ismail, L. , Barros, F.C. et al. (2014) International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown‐rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 44(6), 641–648. Available from: 10.1002/uog.13448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Patten, B.M. (1953) Age, growth, and changes in external form of body; estimation of age and methods of measuring embryos. In: Patton, B.M. (Ed.) Human Embryology, 2nd edition. London: McGraw‐Hill Book Company, pp. 181–203. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pauls, R.N. (2015) Anatomy of the clitoris and the female sexual response. Clinical Anatomy, 28(3), 376–384. Available from: 10.1002/ca.22524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Politzer, G. (1932) Über die Entwicklung des Dammes beim Menschen. Zeitschrift für Anatomie Und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 97(5), 622–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pooh, R.K. , Shiota, K. & Kurjak, A. (2011) Imaging of the human embryo with magnetic resonance imaging microscopy and high‐resolution transvaginal 3‐dimensional sonography: human embryology in the 21st century. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204(1), 77.e71‐16. Available from: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Popper, R. (1937) Die Entwicklung des Praeputium clitoridis. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 107(3), 378–387. [Google Scholar]
  48. Puppo, V. & Puppo, G. (2015) Anatomy of sex: revision of the new anatomical terms used for the clitoris and the female orgasm by sexologists. Clinical Anatomy, 28(3), 293–304. Available from: 10.1002/ca.22471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Robinson, H.P. & Fleming, J.E.E. (1975) A critical evaluation of sonar “crown‐rump length” measurements. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 82(9), 702–710. Available from: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00710.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sharpe, R.M. (2020) Androgens and the masculinization programming window: human‐rodent differences. Biochemical Society Transactions, 48(4), 1725–1735. Available from: 10.1042/BST20200200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Siiteri, P.K. & Wilson, J.D. (1974) Testosterone formation and metabolism during male sexual differentiation in the human embryo. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 38(1), 113–125. Available from: 10.1210/jcem-38-1-113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Soffers, J.H.M. , Hikspoors, J.P.J.M. , Mekonen, H.K. , Koehler, S.E. & Lamers, W.H. (2015) The growth pattern of the human intestine and its mesentery. BMC Developmental Biology, 15(1), 31. Available from: 10.1186/s12861-015-0081-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Szpinda, M. , Paruszewska‐Achtel, M. , Wozniak, A. , Badura, M. , Mila‐Kierzenkowska, C. & Wisniewski, M. (2015) Three‐dimensional growth dynamics of the liver in the human fetus. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 37(5), 439–448. Available from: 10.1007/s00276-015-1437-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tagaki, T. (1927) Über Form‐ und Lageveränderungen der Becken Organe im späteren Embryonalleben. Zeitschrift für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte, 83(1), 339–362. [Google Scholar]
  55. van der Putte, S.C. & Sie‐Go, D.M. (2011) Development and structure of the glandopreputial sulcus of the human clitoris with a special reference to glandopreputial glands. The Anatomical Record (Hoboken), 294(1), 156–164. Available from: 10.1002/ar.21279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wilson, J.D. , George, F.W. & Griffin, J.E. (1981) The hormonal control of sexual development. Science, 211(4488), 1278–1284. Available from: 10.1126/science.7010602 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wroblewska‐Seniuk, K. , Jarzabek‐Bielecka, G. & Kedzia, W. (2021) Gynecological problems in newborns and infants. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10, 1071. Available from: 10.3390/jcm10051071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zimmer, E.Z. , Blazer, S. , Blumenfeld, Z. & Bronshtein, M. (2012) Fetal transient clitoromegaly and transient hypertrophy of the labia minora in early and mid pregnancy. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 31(3), 409–415. Available from: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.3.409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zouboulis, C.C. , Chen, W.C. , Thornton, M.J. , Qin, K. & Rosenfield, R. (2007) Sexual hormones in human skin. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 39(2), 85–95. Available from: 10.1055/s-2007-961807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1.

JOA-246-190-s002.tif (10MB, tif)

Figure S2.

JOA-246-190-s016.tif (18.6MB, tif)

Figure S3.

JOA-246-190-s005.tif (23.5MB, tif)

Figure S4.

JOA-246-190-s008.tif (6.1MB, tif)

Figure S5.

JOA-246-190-s015.pdf (3.9MB, pdf)

Figure S6.

JOA-246-190-s009.pdf (3.5MB, pdf)

Figure S7.

JOA-246-190-s012.pdf (6.8MB, pdf)

Figure S8.

JOA-246-190-s004.pdf (7.7MB, pdf)

Figure S9.

JOA-246-190-s001.pdf (5.8MB, pdf)

Figure S10.

JOA-246-190-s003.pdf (10.5MB, pdf)

Figure S11.

JOA-246-190-s006.pdf (7.7MB, pdf)

Figure S12.

JOA-246-190-s013.pdf (11.2MB, pdf)

Figure S13.

JOA-246-190-s007.pdf (9.9MB, pdf)

Figure S14.

JOA-246-190-s010.pdf (4.1MB, pdf)

Figure S15.

JOA-246-190-s011.pdf (15.5MB, pdf)

Figure S16.

JOA-246-190-s014.pdf (14.4MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data is original data and can be shared.


Articles from Journal of Anatomy are provided here courtesy of Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland

RESOURCES