Showing changes from revision #44 to #45:
Added | Removed | Changed
A mini-course that I have lectured:
Abstract. After global completion of higher gauge fields (as appearing in higher-dimensional supergravity) by proper flux quantization in extraordinary nonabelian cohomology, the (non-perturbative, renormalized) topological quantum observables and quantum states of solitonic field histories are completely determined through a topological form of light-front quantization. We survey the logic of this construction and expand on aspects of the quantization argument.
In the instructive example of 5D Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory (the gauge sector of 5D SuGra) dimensionally reduced to 3D, a suitable choice of flux quantization in Cohomotopy (“Hypothesis h”) recovers fine detail of the traditionally renormalized (Wilson loop) quantum observables of abelian Chern-Simons theory and makes novel predictions about anyons in fractional quantum (anomalous) Hall systems. An analogous choice (“Hypothesis H”) of global completion of 11D higher Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory (the higher gauge sector of 11D SuGra) realizes various aspects of the topological sector of the conjectural “M-theory” and its M5-branes.
\linebreak
Based on:
\linebreak
Followup:
\linebreak
Related talk:
\linebreak
Script
The following is close to the blackboard presentation.
\linebreak
Complete Topological Quantization of Higher Gauge Fields \linebreak ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/ICMS25
\linebreak
Plan:
-
Completion of Higher Gauge Theories
-
Their Complete Topological Quantization
-
Application to Topological Quantum Materials
\linebreak
Motivation:
\linebreak
Part 1 – Completion of Higher Gauge Theories
\linebreak
Recall Maxwell's equations in vacuum:
\linebreak
Suprprisingly good idea to rewrite this in
pre-metric or duality symmetric form
\linebreak
In this vein, say that
higher Maxwell-type equations
on higher flux densities
are equations of the form
for
\linebreak
Examples
RR-field in type IIA 10D supergravity:
self-dual higher gauge field:
Maxwell-Chern-Simons field in minimal 5D supergravity
C-field in 11D supergravity:
\linebreak
Next, assume a globally hyperbolic spacetime
with Cauchy surface
and consider the time-local solution space
\linebreak
Proposition.
Pullback to the Cauchy surface constitutes a bijection:
so:
\linebreak
Proposition: Moreover:
The higher Gauss law is equivalently the closure (flatness)
condition of -valued differential forms
for a characteristic -algebra
\linbreak
Let’s recall what this means:
\linebreak
connected -algebras of finite type are
where is
and closed -valued forms are
\linebreak
Example/Definition/Proposition
For a connected topological space
with abelian fundamental groups (for simplicity)
and ,
then its real Whitehead L∞-algebra is
with brackets uniquely determined by the condition that
\linebreak
Examples
electromagnetism:
self-dual higher gauge field:
RR-field:
Maxwell-Chern-Simons field:
C-field:
\linebreak
Definition/Proposition.
The total flux of a flux density
is its image in non-abelian de Rham cohomology
\linebreak
Definition/Proposition.
Denoting by
-
the rationalization of ,
-
its extension of scalars to the reals
-
the comparison map,
the nonabelian character map is
\linebreak
Flux quantization of a higher gauge theory is
choice of with
Promotion of flux densities to pairs for
a charge whose character is the total flux of :
\linebreak
There are either none or infinitely many admissible
is a hypothesis about the correct model for given physics
\linebreak
Examples
Dirac charge quantization of EM-field:
Hypothesis K on the RR-field
Hypothesis h on Maxwell-Chern-Simons field:
Hypothesis H on C-field:
\linebreak
Finally, the full completed higher gauge field
is not just the flux densities , a charge
and an equality , but involves
a gauge transformation/homotopy exhibiting this equality
which out the “be” the gauge potentials.
The globally completed phase space is, schematically:
\linebreak
More in detail, this is the smooth ∞-groupoid
which as such is the homotopy pullback
of the character map from total flux to flux densities.
\linebreak
Essentially. In the following we will only need
the shape of the space space,
which turns out to be given by a concrete formula.
\linebreak
Part 2 – Their Complete Topological Quantization
\linebreak
observables are the smooth functions on phase space
the topological observables are the locally constant functions
(where is the discrete set underlying )
\linebreak
Proposition
The topological observables
are naturally equivalent to the maps
out of the connected components of the mapping space
from the Cauchy surface into the classifying space,
\linebreak
“Topologically, fields are only seen through their charges.”
\linebreak
Moreover, realistic observables are
supported on finitely many components, hence:
\linebreak
More specifically, we look at field solitons,
whose charge vanishes at infinity
\linebreak
To formalize this, consider a pointed topological space
with basepoint thought of as a point at infinity:
\linebreak
Also think of as pointed by 0-charge
\linebreak
Then a pointed map
literally takes the value at
\linebreak
So the solitonic topological observabels are
\linebreak
Question: What is the quantum operator product on ?
Feynman 1948: the time-ordered ordinary product
e.g. for field operators and their canonical momenta:
\linebreak
NB: The analogue is still true for light front quantization
with respect to ordering in the light-front parameter .
\linebreak
So consider light-front quantization on spacetime if the form
\linebreak
For topological observables which are necessarily -independent
their light-front ordering is their -ordering.
This is given by the Pontrjagin product/fundamental group algebra-structure on:
induced under pushforward in homology
from concatenation of loops
\linebreak
So where \linebreak is the -valued observable asking:
“Is the field history of shape ?”
the observable asks
“Is the field history \linebreak first of shape and \linebreak then of shape ?”
\linebreak
With the algebra of topological quantum observables understood,
the topological quantum states are its modules,
which here are the linear representations of the moduli fundamental group:
\linebreak
Part 3 – Application to Topological Quantum Materials
\linebreak
Consider -Yang-Mills theory on
What are its standard topological flux quantum observables?
\linebreak
Proposition.
The Poisson brackets on linear E/M YM-flux observables through are:
where is with Lie bracket rescaled by .
Their non-perturbative C-star algebraic deformation quantization
is the -convolution algebra:
for choices of
\linebreak
Hence the traditional non-perturbative topological quantum observables
on E/M Yang-Mills fluxes through a surface are:
Specifically for Maxwell theory, where ,
if we choose and then
which coincides with our general from above.
\linebreak
Example.
For the 2-torus,
Algebra of Maxwell Wilson loops on torus.
\linebreak
Now consider lifting these particles in 4D to strings in 5D
\linebreak
Under Hyothesis h, with ,
the topological observables are deformed to:
Proposition.
which is the integer Heisenberg group at level=2:
with generating elements
on which the only non-trivial group commutator is
\linebreak
This is a nonabelian deformation of the Maxwell Wilson loops.
In fact this is exactly the algebra of observables of:
-
abelian Chern-Simons theory
-
anyons in fractional quantum Hall systems,
the latter being (vortices in a 2D electron liquid induced by)
surplus magnetic flux quanta
on top of some rational number of flux quanta per electrons.
\linebreak
Let’s further lift this situation to 11D supergravity on
with
globally completed according to Hypothesis H:
\linebreak
Proposition.
Under the Pontrjagin theorem this says that
5-branes on this background, wrapped on
have the same anyon braiding in as FQH anyons on
\linebreak
Back to the case in 5D,
to see more transparently where the anyon braiding comes from
consider the simpler situation flux through the plane
Then the 2-Cohomotopical quantum observables are spanned by
This looks simple, but let’s see what these observables observe:
Pontrjagin theorem:
In our situation, these links are
vacuum diagrams of flux quanta on the surface.
\linebreak
Proposition.
The observables
compute the writhe or total linking of a link.
Hence in a pure quantum state this is
These are exactly the expectation values of traditionally
renormalized Wilson loop observable of abelian Chern-Simons.
\linebreak
The first line shows that a braiding phase
is picked up for each crossing in the link diagram
hence for each braiding of the anyon worldlines.
\linebreak
For more see at ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/ICMS25
\linebreak
\linebreak
\linebreak