Schreiber Edinburgh 2025 (Rev #45, changes)

Showing changes from revision #44 to #45: Added | Removed | Changed

A mini-course that I have lectured:



Abstract. After global completion of higher gauge fields (as appearing in higher-dimensional supergravity) by proper flux quantization in extraordinary nonabelian cohomology, the (non-perturbative, renormalized) topological quantum observables and quantum states of solitonic field histories are completely determined through a topological form of light-front quantization. We survey the logic of this construction and expand on aspects of the quantization argument.

In the instructive example of 5D Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory (the gauge sector of 5D SuGra) dimensionally reduced to 3D, a suitable choice of flux quantization in Cohomotopy (“Hypothesis h”) recovers fine detail of the traditionally renormalized (Wilson loop) quantum observables of abelian Chern-Simons theory and makes novel predictions about anyons in fractional quantum (anomalous) Hall systems. An analogous choice (“Hypothesis H”) of global completion of 11D higher Maxwell-Chern-Simons theory (the higher gauge sector of 11D SuGra) realizes various aspects of the topological sector of the conjectural “M-theory” and its M5-branes.

\linebreak

Based on:

\linebreak

Followup:

\linebreak

Related talk:

\linebreak

Script

The following is close to the blackboard presentation.

\linebreak

Complete Topological Quantization of Higher Gauge Fields \linebreak ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/ICMS25

\linebreak

Plan:

  1. Completion of Higher Gauge Theories

  2. Their Complete Topological Quantization

  3. Application to Topological Quantum Materials

\linebreak

Motivation:

\linebreak

Part 1 – Completion of Higher Gauge Theories

\linebreak

Recall Maxwell's equations in vacuum:

dF 2=0,d⋆ 1,3F 2=0. \mathrm{d} F_2 = 0 ,\;\;\; \mathrm{d} \star_{1,3} F_2 = 0 \mathrlap{\,.}

\linebreak

Suprprisingly good idea to rewrite this in

pre-metric or duality symmetric form

dF 2 =0 dG 2 =0},G 2=⋆ 1,3F 2 \left. \begin{aligned} \mathrm{d} F_2 & = 0 \\ \mathrm{d} G_2 &= 0 \end{aligned} \right\}\,, \;\;\;\;\; G_2 = \star_{1,3} F_2

\linebreak

In this vein, say that

higher Maxwell-type equations

on higher flux densities

F→≔(F (i)∈Ω dR deg i(X 1,d)) i∈I \vec F \;\coloneqq\; \Big( F^{(i)} \in \Omega^{deg_i}_{dR}(X^{1,d}) \Big)_{i \in I}

are equations of the form

dF→=P→(F→),⋆ 1,dF→=μ→(F→) \mathrm{d} \vec F \;=\; \vec P\big( \vec F \big) \,,\;\;\;\; \star_{1,d} \vec F = \vec \mu\big( \vec F \big)

for

\linebreak

Examples

RR-field in type IIA 10D supergravity:

dF 2•=0},⋆ 1,9F 2•=F 10−2•,. \mathrm{d} F_{2\bullet} = 0 \Big\} \,,\;\;\;\; \star_{1,9} F_{2\bullet} = F_{10-2\bullet} ,.

self-dual higher gauge field:

dH 2k+1=0},⋆ 1,4k+1H 2k+1=H 2k+1 \mathrm{d} H_{2k+1} = 0 \Big\} \,,\;\;\;\;\; \star_{1,4k+1} H_{2k+1} = H_{2k+1}

Maxwell-Chern-Simons field in minimal 5D supergravity

dF 2 =0 dF 3 =12F 2∧F 2},F 3=⋆ 1,4F 2 \left. \begin{aligned} \mathrm{d} F_2 & = 0 \\ \mathrm{d} F_3 & = \tfrac{1}{2} F_2 \wedge F_2 \end{aligned} \right\} \,,\;\;\;\; F_3 = \star_{1,4} F_2

C-field in 11D supergravity:

dG 4 =0 dG 7 =12G 4∧G 4},G 7=⋆ 1,10G 4. \left. \begin{aligned} \mathrm{d} G_4 & = 0 \\ \mathrm{d} G_7 & = \tfrac{1}{2} G_4 \wedge G_4 \end{aligned} \right\} \,,\;\;\;\; G_7 = \star_{1,10} G_4 \mathrlap{\,.}

\linebreak

Next, assume a globally hyperbolic spacetime

X 1,d≃ℝ 1,0×X d X^{1,d} \simeq \mathbb{R}^{1,0} \times X^d

with Cauchy surface X d↪ι tℝ 1,0×X dX^d \xhookrightarrow{ \iota_t } \mathbb{R}^{1,0} \times X^d

and consider the time-local solution space

LocSol t≔{ temporal germs of solutions of the above EoMs around {t}×X d}. LocSol_t \;\coloneqq\; \left\{ \begin{array}{l} \text{ temporal germs of solutions } \\ \text{ of the above EoMs around }\; \{t\} \times X^d \end{array} \right\} \mathrlap{\,.}

\linebreak

Proposition.

Pullback to the Cauchy surface constitutes a bijection:

LocSol t→∼−−ι t *−−{B→≔(B (i)∈Ω dR deg i(X d)) i∈I|dB→=P→(B→)⏞higher Gauss law} LocSol_t \xrightarrow[\sim]{\phantom{--}\iota_t^\ast\phantom{--}} \Big\{ \vec B \coloneqq \big( B^{(i)} \in \Omega^{deg_i}_{dR}(X^d) \big)_{i \in I} \;\Big\vert\; \overset{ \text{higher Gauss law} }{ \overbrace{ \mathrm{d}\vec B = \vec P(\vec B) } } \Big\}

so:

\linebreak

Proposition: Moreover:

The higher Gauss law is equivalently the closure (flatness)

condition of 𝔞\mathfrak{a}-valued differential forms

{B→|dB→=P→(B→)}≃Ω dR 1(X d;𝔞) cl \Big\{ \vec B \;\Big\vert\; \mathrm{d}\vec B = \vec P(\vec B) \Big\} \;\; \simeq \;\; \Omega^1_{dR}\big(X^d; \mathfrak{a}\big)_{cl}

for a characteristic L ∞L_\infty-algebra 𝔞\mathfrak{a}

\linbreak

Let’s recall what this means:

\linebreak

connected L ∞L_\infty-algebras of finite type are

L ∞Alg conn ft ↪−−CE−− dgcAlg op (𝔤,[−],[−,−], [−,−,−],⋯) ↦ (∧ •𝔤 ∨,d |∧ 1𝔤 ∨=[−] *+[−,−] *+ [−,−,−] *+⋯) \begin{array}{ccc} L_\infty Alg^{ft}_{conn} &\xhookrightarrow{\phantom{--}CE\phantom{--}}& dgcAlg^{op} \\ \left( \mathfrak{g} ,\; \begin{array}{l} [-], [-,-], \\ [-,-,-], \cdots \end{array} \right) &\mapsto& \left( \wedge^\bullet \mathfrak{g}^{\vee} ,\, \mathrm{d}_{\vert \wedge^1 \mathfrak{g}^{\vee}} = \begin{array}{l} [-]^\ast + [-,-]^\ast + \\ [-,-,-]^\ast + \cdots \end{array} \right) \end{array}

where 𝔤\mathfrak{g} is

and closed L ∞L_\infty-valued forms are

Ω dR 1(X;𝔤) cl≔Hom dgAlg(CE(𝔤),Ω dR •(X)) \Omega^1_{dR}\big(X; \mathfrak{g}\big)_{cl} \;\coloneqq\; Hom_{dgAlg}\Big( CE(\mathfrak{g}) , \Omega^\bullet_{dR}(X) \Big)

\linebreak

Example/Definition/Proposition

For 𝒜\mathcal{A} a connected topological space

with abelian fundamental groups (for simplicity)

and dim ℝ(H •(𝒜,ℝ))<∞dim_{\mathbb{R}}\big(H^\bullet(\mathcal{A},\mathbb{R})\big) \lt \infty,

then its real Whitehead L∞-algebra 𝔩𝒜\mathfrak{l}\mathcal{A} is

(𝔩𝒜) •≔π •(Ω𝒜)⊗ ℤℝ (\mathfrak{l}\mathcal{A})_\bullet \coloneqq \pi_\bullet(\Omega \mathcal{A}) \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{R}

with brackets uniquely determined by the condition that

H •(CE(𝔩𝒜))≃H •(𝒜;ℝ). H^\bullet\big( CE(\mathfrak{l}\mathcal{A}) \big) \;\simeq\; H^\bullet\big( \mathcal{A}; \mathbb{R} \big) \mathrlap{\,.}

\linebreak

Examples

electromagnetism: 𝔞=𝔩(BU(1) 2)\mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{l}(B \mathrm{U}(1)^2)

self-dual higher gauge field: 𝔞=𝔩B 2kℤ\mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{l} B^{2k} \mathbb{Z}

RR-field: 𝔞=𝔩(BU)\mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{l}(B \mathrm{U})

Maxwell-Chern-Simons field: 𝔞=𝔩S 2\mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{l}S^2

C-field: 𝔞=𝔩S 4\mathfrak{a} = \mathfrak{l}S^4

\linebreak

Definition/Proposition.

The total flux of a flux density F→\vec F

is its image in non-abelian de Rham cohomology

H dR 1(X;𝔞)≃Ω dR 1(X;𝔞) cl/concordance H^1_{dR}\big( X;\, \mathfrak{a} \big) \;\simeq\; \Omega^1_{dR}\big(X; \mathfrak{a}\big)_{cl}\big/ \text{concordance}

\linebreak

Definition/Proposition.

Denoting by

  • L ℚ𝒜L^{\mathbb{Q}}\mathcal{A} the rationalization of 𝒜\mathcal{A},

  • L ℝ𝒜L^{\mathbb{R}}\mathcal{A} its extension of scalars to the reals

  • η ℝ:𝒜⟶L ℝ𝒜\eta^{\mathbb{R}} \colon \mathcal{A} \longrightarrow L^{\mathbb{R}} \mathcal{A} the comparison map,

the nonabelian character map is

charge in nonabelian cohomology character total flux in nonabelian dR-cohomology H 1(X;Ω𝒜) →−−ch 𝒜−− H dR 1(X;𝔞) = ≃ π 0Map(X,𝒜) →−−η ℝ−− π 0Map(X,L ℝ𝒜) \begin{array}{ccc} \begin{array}{c} \text{charge in} \\ \text{nonabelian cohomology} \end{array} &character& \begin{array}{c} \text{total flux in} \\ \text{nonabelian dR-cohomology} \end{array} \\ H^1(X;\,\Omega \mathcal{A}) &\xrightarrow{\phantom{--} ch^{\mathcal{A}} \phantom{--}}& H^1_{dR}\big(X;\,\mathfrak{a}\big) \\ = && \simeq \\ \pi_0\, Map\big(X, \mathcal{A}\big) &\xrightarrow{\phantom{--} \eta^{\mathbb{R}} \phantom{--}}& \pi_0\, Map\big(X, L^{\mathbb{R}}\mathcal{A}\big) \end{array}

\linebreak

Flux quantization of a higher gauge theory is

choice of 𝒜\mathcal{A} with 𝔩𝒜≃𝔞\mathfrak{l}\mathcal{A}\simeq \mathfrak{a}

Promotion of flux densities to pairs (F→,χ)(\vec F, \chi) for

χ\chi a charge whose character is the total flux of F→\vec F:

Ω dR 1(X d;𝔞) cl →[−] H dR 1(X d;𝔞) ←ch 𝒜 H 1(X d;Ω𝒜) F→ ↦ [F→]=ch 𝒜([χ]) ←| [χ] \begin{array}{ccccc} \Omega^1_{dR}\big( X^d; \mathfrak{a} \big)_{cl} &\xrightarrow{ [-] }& H^1_{dR}\big( X^d;\, \mathfrak{a} \big) &\xleftarrow{ ch^{\mathcal{A}} }& H^1(X^d; \Omega \mathcal{A}) \\ \vec F &\mapsto& [\vec F] = ch^{\mathcal{A}}([\chi]) &\leftarrow\!\!\!\vert& [\chi] \end{array}

\linebreak

There are either none or infinitely many admissible 𝒜\mathcal{A}

⇒\Rightarrow 𝒜\mathcal{A} is a hypothesis about the correct model for given physics

\linebreak

Examples

Dirac charge quantization of EM-field: 𝒜≡BU(1) 2\mathcal{A} \equiv B \mathrm{U}(1)^2

Hypothesis K on the RR-field

Hypothesis h on Maxwell-Chern-Simons field: 𝒜≡S 2\mathcal{A} \equiv S^2

Hypothesis H on C-field: 𝒜≡S 4\mathcal{A} \equiv S^4

\linebreak

Finally, the full completed higher gauge field

is not just the flux densities F→\vec F, a charge χ\chi

and an equality [F→]=ch[χ][\vec F] = ch[\chi], but involves

a gauge transformation/homotopy A^\widehat{A} exhibiting this equality

which out the “be” the gauge potentials.

The globally completed phase space is, schematically:

PhsSpc≔{flux densities F→∈Ω dR 1(X d;𝔞) cl local charges χ∈Map(X d,𝒜) gauge potentials A^:F→⇒χ} PhsSpc \;\coloneqq\; \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} \text{flux densities} & \vec F \in \Omega^1_{dR}(X^d;\mathfrak{a})_{cl} \\ \text{local charges} & \chi \in Map(X^d, \mathcal{A}) \\ \text{gauge potentials} & \widehat{A} \colon \vec F \Rightarrow \chi \end{array} \right\}

\linebreak

More in detail, this is the smooth ∞-groupoid

which as such is the homotopy pullback

of the character map from total flux to flux densities.

\linebreak

Essentially. In the following we will only need

the shape of the space space,

which turns out to be given by a concrete formula.

\linebreak

Part 2 – Their Complete Topological Quantization

\linebreak

observables are the smooth functions on phase space

O:PhsSpc⟶ℂ O \,\colon\, PhsSpc \longrightarrow \mathbb{C}

the topological observables are the locally constant functions

O top:PhsSpc⟶♭ℂ O_{top} \,\colon\, PhsSpc \longrightarrow \flat \mathbb{C}

(where ♭𝒞\flat \mathcal{C} is the discrete set underlying 𝒞\mathcal{C})

\linebreak

Proposition

The topological observables

PhsSpc→−−♭ℂ PhsSpc \xrightarrow{\phantom{--}} \flat \mathbb{C}

are naturally equivalent to the maps

π 0Map(X d,𝒜)→−−𝒞 \pi_0 \, Map(X^d, \mathcal{A}) \xrightarrow{\phantom{--}} \mathcal{C}

out of the connected components of the mapping space

from the Cauchy surface into the classifying space,

\linebreak

“Topologically, fields are only seen through their charges.”

\linebreak

Moreover, realistic observables are

supported on finitely many components, hence:

TopObs≔ℂ[π 0Map(X d,𝒜)]≃H 0(Map(X d,𝒜);ℂ) TopObs \;\coloneqq\; \mathbb{C}\big[ \pi_0 \, Map(X^d, \mathcal{A}) \big] \,\simeq\, H_0\big( Map(X^d, \mathcal{A}) ;\, \mathbb{C} \big)

\linebreak

More specifically, we look at field solitons,

whose charge vanishes at infinity

\linebreak

To formalize this, consider a pointed topological space

(X dom d,∞)∈Top * \big( X^d_{dom}, \infty \big) \in Top^\ast

with basepoint thought of as a point at infinity:

X d≃X dom d∖{∞} X^d \,\simeq\, X^d_{dom} \setminus \{\infty\}

\linebreak

Also think of 𝒜\mathcal{A} as pointed by 0-charge

(𝒜,0)∈Top *. \big(\mathcal{A}, 0\big) \in Top^\ast \,.

\linebreak

Then a pointed map χ∈Map *(X dom d,𝒜)\chi \in Map^\ast\big(X^d_{dom}, \mathcal{A}\big)

literally takes the value 00 at ∞\infty

X dom d →−−χ−− 𝒜 ↑ ↑ {∞} →−−−− {0} \begin{array}{ccc} X^d_{dom} &\xrightarrow{\phantom{--} \chi \phantom{--}}& \mathcal{A} \\ \uparrow && \uparrow \\ \{\infty\} &\xrightarrow{\phantom{----}}& \{0\} \end{array}

\linebreak

So the solitonic topological observabels are

TopObs≔ℂ[Map *(X dom d,𝒜)] TopObs \,\coloneqq\, \mathbb{C}\Big[ Map^\ast\big(X^d_{dom}, \mathcal{A}\big) \Big]

\linebreak

Question: What is the quantum operator product ⋆\star on TopObsTopObs?

Feynman 1948: the time-ordered ordinary product

e.g. for field operators ϕ\phi and their canonical momenta:

⟨π(t,x→)⋆ϕ(t,y→)⟩ = lim⟶ϵ→ +0⟨π(t+ϵ,x→)⋅ϕ(t,y→)⟩ −⟨ϕ(t,x→)⋆π(t,y→)⟩ −lim⟶ϵ→ +0⟨ϕ(t+ϵ,x→)⋅π(t,y→)⟩ \begin{array}{rcr} \big\langle \pi(t, \vec x) \star \phi(t, \vec y) \big\rangle &=& \underset{\underset{\epsilon \to_+ 0}{\longrightarrow}}{\lim} \big\langle \pi(t + \epsilon, \vec x) \cdot \phi(t, \vec y) \big\rangle \\ - \big\langle \phi(t, \vec x) \star \pi(t, \vec y) \big\rangle && - \underset{\underset{\epsilon \to_+ 0}{\longrightarrow}}{\lim} \big\langle \phi(t + \epsilon, \vec x) \cdot \pi(t, \vec y) \big\rangle \end{array}

\linebreak

NB: The analogue is still true for light front quantization

with respect to ordering in the light-front parameter x +≔x 0+x 1x^+ \coloneqq x^0 + x^1.

\linebreak

So consider light-front quantization on spacetime if the form

X 1,d ≃ℝ 1,1×X d−1 X d ≃ℝ 1×X d−1 X dom d =ℝ ∪{∞} 1∧X dom d−1 \begin{aligned} X^{1,d} &\simeq\, \mathbb{R}^{1,1} \times X^{d-1} \\ X^d & \simeq \mathbb{R}^1 \times X^{d-1} \\ X^d_{dom} & = \mathbb{R}^1_{\cup \{\infty\}} \wedge X^{d-1}_{dom} \end{aligned}

\linebreak

For topological observables which are necessarily x 0x^0-independent

their light-front ordering is their x 1x^1-ordering.

This is given by the Pontrjagin product/fundamental group algebra-structure on:

TopObs =H 0(Map *(ℝ ∪{∞} 1∧X dom d)) ≃H 0(ΩMap *(X dom d)) ≃ℂ[π 1Map *(X dom d)] \begin{aligned} TopObs & = H_0\Big( Map^\ast\big( \mathbb{R}^1_{\cup \{\infty\}} \wedge X^d_{dom} \big) \Big) \\ & \simeq H_0\Big( \Omega Map^\ast\big( X^d_{dom} \big) \Big) \\ & \simeq \mathbb{C}\Big[ \pi_1 \, Map^\ast\big( X^d_{dom} \big) \Big] \end{aligned}

induced under pushforward in homology

H 0(ΩM)⊗H 0(ΩM)≃H 0(ΩM×ΩM)→−−⋆ *−−H 0(ΩM) H_0(\Omega M) \otimes H_0(\Omega M) \simeq H_0(\Omega M \times \Omega M) \xrightarrow{\phantom{--} \star_\ast \phantom{--}} H_0(\Omega M)

from concatenation of loops

ΩM×ΩM →−−⋆−− ΩM (ℓ 2,ℓ 1) ↦ ℓ 2⋆ℓ 1 :x 1↦{ℓ 1(ln(−1x 1)) | x 1≥0 ℓ 2(ln(+x 1)) | x 1≤0 \begin{array}{ccc} \Omega M \times \Omega M &\xrightarrow{\phantom{--} \star \phantom{--}}& \Omega M \\ \big( \ell_2, \ell_1 \big) &\mapsto& \ell_2 \star \ell_1 & \colon\; x^1 \,\mapsto\, \left\{ \begin{array}{lcl} \ell_1\big(\ln(-\tfrac{1}{x^1})\big) & \vert & x^1 \geq 0 \\ \ell_2\big(\ln(+x^1)\big) & \vert & x^1 \leq 0 \end{array} \right. \end{array}

\linebreak

So where δ ℓ∈TopObs\delta_\ell \in TopObs \linebreak is the {0,1}\{0,1\}-valued observable asking:

“Is the field history of shape [ℓ][\ell]?”

the observable δ ℓ 2⋆δ ℓ 1\delta_{\ell_2} \star \delta_{\ell_1} asks

“Is the field history \linebreak first of shape ℓ 1\ell_1 and \linebreak then of shape ℓ 2\ell_2?”

\linebreak

With the algebra of topological quantum observables understood,

the topological quantum states are its modules,

which here are the linear representations of the moduli fundamental group:

TopQuStSpc ≔(TopObs,⋆)Mod ≡(H 0(ΩMap *(X dom d−1,𝒜)),⋆)Mod ≃(ℂ[π 1Map *(X dom d−1,𝒜)])Mod ≃(π 1Map *(X dom d−1,𝒜))Rep \begin{aligned} TopQuStSpc & \coloneqq (TopObs, \star) Mod \\ & \equiv \Big( H_0\big( \Omega Map^\ast(X^{d-1}_{dom}, \mathcal{A}) \big), \star \Big) Mod \\ & \simeq \Big( \mathbb{C}\big[ \pi_1 Map^\ast(X^{d-1}_{dom}, \mathcal{A}) \big] \Big) Mod \\ & \simeq \big( \pi_1 Map^\ast(X^{d-1}_{dom}, \mathcal{A}) \big) Rep \end{aligned}

\linebreak

Part 3 – Application to Topological Quantum Materials

\linebreak

Consider 𝔤\mathfrak{g}-Yang-Mills theory on

X 1,3=ℝ 1,1×Σ 2 X^{1,3} = \mathbb{R}^{1,1} \times \Sigma^2

What are its standard topological flux quantum observables?

\linebreak

Proposition.

The Poisson brackets on linear E/M YM-flux observables through Σ 2\Sigma^2 are:

C ∞(Σ 2,𝔤 ℏ)⏟electric flux⋉ adC ∞(Σ 2,𝔤 0)⏟,magnetic flux \underset{\text{electric flux}}{ \underbrace{ C^\infty\big( \Sigma^2, \mathfrak{g}_{\hbar} \big) } } \ltimes_{ad} \underset{\text{magnetic flux}}{ \underbrace{ C^\infty\big( \Sigma^2, \mathfrak{g}_{0} \big) } \mathrlap{\,,} }

where 𝔤 ℏ\mathfrak{g}_{\hbar} is 𝔤\mathfrak{g} with Lie bracket rescaled by ℏ∈ℝ >0\hbar \in \mathbb{R}_{\gt 0}.

Their non-perturbative C-star algebraic deformation quantization

is the C *C^\ast-convolution algebra:

ℂ[C ∞(Σ 2,G)⋉ AdC ∞(Σ 2,𝔤 0/Λ)] \mathbb{C}\Big[ C^\infty\big( \Sigma^2, G \big) \ltimes_{Ad} C^\infty\big( \Sigma^2, \mathfrak{g}_{0}/\Lambda \big) \Big]

for choices of

\linebreak

Hence the traditional non-perturbative topological quantum observables

on E/M Yang-Mills fluxes through a surface Σ 2\Sigma^2 are:

TopObs trad =ℂ[π 0C ∞(Σ 2,G⋉𝔤 0/Λ)] ≃ℂ[π 0Map(Σ 2,G⋉𝔤 0/Λ)] ≃ℂ[π 1Map(Σ 2,B(G⋉𝔤 0/Λ))] \begin{aligned} TopObs^{trad} & = \mathbb{C}\Big[ \pi_0 C^\infty\big( \Sigma^2, G \ltimes \mathfrak{g}_{0}/\Lambda \big) \Big] \\ & \simeq \mathbb{C}\Big[ \pi_0 Map\big( \Sigma^2, G \ltimes \mathfrak{g}_{0}/\Lambda \big) \Big] \\ & \simeq \mathbb{C}\Big[ \pi_1 Map\big( \Sigma^2, B(G \ltimes \mathfrak{g}_{0}/\Lambda) \big) \Big] \end{aligned}

Specifically for Maxwell theory, where 𝔤=𝔲(1)\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{u}(1),

if we choose G=U(1)G = \mathrm{U}(1) and Λ=ℤ⊂ℝ\Lambda = \mathbb{Z} \subset \mathbb{R} then

TopObs trad=ℂ[π 1Map(Σ 2,BU(1) 2)] TopObs^{trad} = \mathbb{C}\Big[ \pi_1 Map\big( \Sigma^2, B \mathrm{U}(1)^2 \big) \Big]

which coincides with our general TopObsTopObs from above.

\linebreak

Example.

For Σ 2=T 2\Sigma^2 = T^2 the 2-torus,

π 1Map(T 2,BU(1)) ≃π 0Map(T 2,U(1)) ≃H 1(T 2;ℤ) ≃ℤ a×ℤ b \begin{aligned} \pi_1 Map\big( T^2 , B \mathrm{U}(1) \big) & \simeq \pi_0 Map\big( T^2 , \mathrm{U}(1) \big) \\ & \simeq H^1(T^2; \mathbb{Z}) \\ & \simeq \mathbb{Z}_a \times \mathbb{Z}_b \end{aligned}

Algebra of Maxwell Wilson loops on torus.

\linebreak

Now consider lifting these particles in 4D to strings in 5D

X 1,4≃ℝ 1,1×(ℝ 1×Σ 2) X^{1,4} \simeq \mathbb{R}^{1,1} \times (\mathbb{R}^1 \times \Sigma^2)

X dom 4=ℝ ⊔{∞} 1∧(ℝ 1×Σ 2) ∪∞. X^4_{dom} = \mathbb{R}^1_{\sqcup \{\infty\}} \wedge (\mathbb{R}^1 \times \Sigma^2)_{\cup \infty} \,.

\linebreak

Under Hyothesis h, with 𝒜=S 2↪ι 2BU(1)\mathcal{A} = S^2 \xhookrightarrow{\iota_2} B \mathrm{U}(1),

the topological observables are deformed to:

Proposition.

π 1Map(T 2,S 2)≃ℤ 2^ \pi_1 Map\big( T^2, S^2 \big) \simeq \widehat{\mathbb{Z}^2}

which is the integer Heisenberg group at level=2:

ℤ 2^≔ Set(ℤ a×ℤ b)×ℤ \widehat{\mathbb{Z}^2} \coloneqq_{Set} (\mathbb{Z}_a \times \mathbb{Z}_b) \times \mathbb{Z}

with generating elements

W a ≔((1,0),0) W b ≔((0,1),0) ζ ≔((0,0),1) \begin{aligned} W_a &\coloneqq \big((1,0), 0\big) \\ W_b &\coloneqq \big((0,1), 0\big) \\ \zeta &\coloneqq \big((0,0), 1\big) \end{aligned}

on which the only non-trivial group commutator is

[W a,W b]=ζ 2. [W_a, W_b] = \zeta^2 \mathrlap{\,.}

\linebreak

This is a nonabelian deformation of the Maxwell Wilson loops.

In fact this is exactly the algebra of observables of:

  1. abelian Chern-Simons theory

  2. anyons in fractional quantum Hall systems,

the latter being (vortices in a 2D electron liquid induced by)

surplus magnetic flux quanta

on top of some rational number of flux quanta per electrons.

\linebreak

Let’s further lift this situation to 11D supergravity on

X 1,10≔ℝ 1,3×(ℝ 1×S 3×S 3) X^{1,10} \coloneqq \mathbb{R}^{1,3} \times \big( \mathbb{R}^1 \times S^3 \times S^3 \big)

with

X dom 10≔ℝ ⊔{∞} 3∧(ℝ 1×S 3×S 3) ∪{∞} X^{10}_{dom} \coloneqq \mathbb{R}^3_{\sqcup \{\infty\}} \wedge \big( \mathbb{R}^1 \times S^3 \times S^3 \big)_{\cup \{\infty\}}

globally completed according to Hypothesis H:

\linebreak

Proposition.

π 1Map(S 3×S 3,S 4)≃ℤ 2^×ℤ /12 \pi_1 Map\big( S^3 \times S^3, S^4 \big) \simeq \widehat{\mathbb{Z}^2} \times \mathbb{Z}_{/12}

Under the Pontrjagin theorem this says that

5-branes on this background, wrapped on ℝ 1,3\mathbb{R}^{1,3}

have the same anyon braiding in S 3×S 3S^3 \times S^3 as FQH anyons on T 2T^2

\linebreak

Back to the case in 5D,

to see more transparently where the anyon braiding comes from

consider the simpler situation flux through the plane

X 1,4 =ℝ 1,1×(ℝ 1×ℝ 2) X dom 4 =ℝ ⊔{∞} 1∧ℝ ∪∞ 3 \begin{aligned} X^{1,4} & = \mathbb{R}^{1,1} \times (\mathbb{R}^1 \times \mathbb{R}^2) \\ X^4_{dom} & = \mathbb{R}^1_{\sqcup \{\infty\}} \wedge \mathbb{R}^3_{\cup \infty} \end{aligned}

Then the 2-Cohomotopical quantum observables are spanned by

π 1Map(S 2,S 2)≃π 3(S 2)≃ℤ \pi_1 \, \mathrm{Map}\big( S^2 ,\, S^2 \big) \simeq \pi_3(S^2) \simeq \mathbb{Z}

This looks simple, but let’s see what these observables observe:

Pontrjagin theorem:

π 2(S 3)={framed links}/(cobordism) \pi^2(S^3) = \Big\{ \text{framed links} \Big\} \Big/ \big(\text{cobordism}\big)

In our situation, these links are

vacuum diagrams of flux quanta on the surface.

\linebreak

Proposition.

The observables

{framed links} ⟶ ℤ L ↦ #L \begin{array}{ccc} \Big\{ \text{framed links} \Big\} &\longrightarrow& \mathbb{Z} \\ L &\mapsto& \# L \end{array}

compute the writhe or total linking of a link.

Hence in a pure quantum state |K⟩\vert K \rangle this is

⟨K|𝒪 L|K⟩ =exp(πiK#L) =exp(πiK(∑ i≠jlnk(L i,L j)+∑ ifrm(L i))) \begin{aligned} \langle K \vert \mathcal{O}_L \vert K \rangle & = \exp\big( \tfrac{\pi \mathrm{i}}{K} \# L \big) \\ & = \exp\bigg( \tfrac{\pi\mathrm{i}}{K} \Big( \textstyle{\sum_{i \neq j}} lnk(L_i, L_j) + \textstyle{\sum_{i}} frm(L_i) \Big) \bigg) \end{aligned}

These are exactly the expectation values of traditionally

renormalized Wilson loop observable of abelian Chern-Simons.

\linebreak

The first line shows that a braiding phase

ζ≔exp(πiK) \zeta \coloneqq \exp(\tfrac{\pi \mathrm{i}}{K})

is picked up for each crossing in the link diagram

hence for each braiding of the anyon worldlines.

\linebreak

For more see at ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/ICMS25

\linebreak


\linebreak

\linebreak

Revision on September 28, 2026 at 08:43:15 by Urs Schreiber. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.