nLab canonical topology (changes)

Showing changes from revision #12 to #13: Added | Removed | Changed

Context

Topos Theory

topos theory

Background

Toposes

Internal Logic

Topos morphisms

Extra stuff, structure, properties

Cohomology and homotopy

In higher category theory

Theorems

Contents

Definition

The canonical topology on a category CC is the Grothendieck topology on CC which is the largest subcanonical topology. More explicitly, a sieve RR is a covering for the canonical topology iff every representable functor is a sheaf for every pullback of RR. Such sieves are called universally effective-epimorphic.

Examples

On a Grothendieck topos

If CC is a Grothendieck topos, then the canonical covering sieves are those that are jointly epimorphic. Moreover, in this case the canonical topology is generated by small jointly epimorphic families, since CC has a small generating set.

The canonical topology of a Grothendieck topos is also special in that every sheaf is representable; that is, C≃Sh canonical(C)C \simeq Sh_{canonical}(C).

Notice that if (D,J)(D,J) is a site of definition for the topos CC, then this says that

Proposition
Sh J(D)≃Sh canonical(Sh J(D)). Sh_J(D) \simeq Sh_{canonical}(Sh_J(D)) \,.

(e.g. Johnstone, prop C 2.2.7, Makkai-Reyes, lemma 1.3.14)

Proof

For simplicity, assume (ℂ,J)(\mathbb{C}, J) is a small subcanonical site. The quasi-inverse of the Yoneda embedding Sh(ℂ,J)→Sh(Sh(ℂ,J))\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J) \to \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J)) has a very simple description: it is the functor that sends a sheaf F:Sh(ℂ,J) op→SetF : \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J)^\mathrm{op} \to \mathbf{Set} to its restriction along the Yoneda embedding ℂ→Sh(ℂ,J)\mathbb{C} \to \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J).

Indeed, suppose F:Sh(ℂ,J) op→SetF : \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J)^\mathrm{op} \to \mathbf{Set} is a sheaf. We claim that FF is determined up to unique isomorphism by its restriction along the embedding ℂ→Sh(ℂ,J)\mathbb{C} \to \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J). Indeed, let X:ℂ op→SetX : \mathbb{C}^\mathrm{op} \to \mathbf{Set} be a JJ-sheaf. Then XX is the colimit of a canonical small diagram of representable sheaves on (ℂ,J)(\mathbb{C}, J) in a canonical way. Consider the colimiting cocone on XX: it is a universal effective epimorphic family and is therefore a covering family in the canonical topology on Sh(ℂ,J)\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J). Thus, F(X)F (X) is indeed determined up to unique isomorphism by the restriction of FF to ℂ\mathbb{C}. We must also show that the restriction is actually a sheaf on (ℂ,J)(\mathbb{C}, J); but this is true because JJ-covering sieves in ℂ\mathbb{C} become universal effective epimorphic families in Sh(ℂ,J)\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J).

Thus we obtain a functor Sh(Sh(ℂ,J))→Sh(ℂ,J)\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J)) \to \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J) that is left quasi-inverse to the embedding Sh(ℂ,J)→Sh(Sh(ℂ,J))\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J) \to \mathbf{Sh}(\mathbf{Sh}(\mathbb{C}, J)), and the argument above shows that it is also a right quasi-inverse.

References

A textbook account in topos theory is in

Discussion of examples:

  • Cynthia Lester, Covers in the Canonical Grothendieck Topology ( [[arXiv:1909.03384](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03384)]arXiv:1909.03384)

  • Cynthia Lester, The canonical Grothendieck topology and a homotopical analog , 2019 PhD ( thesis (2019) [[uoregon:1794/24924](https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/24924)uoregon:1794/24924 pdf ) ]

  • Cynthia Lester, The canonical Grothendieck topology and a homotopical analog [[arXiv:1909.03188](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03188)]

Discussion in the refined context of higher topos theory is in

Last revised on April 16, 2023 at 11:02:07. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.