This term comes from thinking of and as bundles over ; then the fiber of over a generalized element of is the product of the fibers of and over . In other words, the fiber product is the product taken fiber-wise.
Of course, the fiber of at the generalized element is itself a pullback ; the terminology depends on your point of view.
Examples
In Set the fiber product is given by the usual formula
Chris: I’d appreciate it if someone could add an explanation of fiber products as limits of compsimplicial diagrams , making the coface maps explicit.
Chris: I’d appreciate it if someone could add an explanation of fiber products as limits of compsimplicial diagrams , making the coface maps explicit.
the first two coface maps are in full detail given by
and
With that it is clear that the fiber product is the equalizer of these two maps, i.e. the limit over the diagram
I am guessing, but haven’t really checked in detail that the further coface maps continue this: the “inner” ones come from the diagonal and the outer ones from and as above. So for instance the next three would be
and
and
This way, unless I am making a mistake, the ordinary limit over the diagram
would still be , but the homotopy limit would pick up the right first degree correction for the homotopy fiber product.
Revision on May 18, 2009 at 14:32:19 by
Urs Schreiber
See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.