nLab comonoid (Rev #14)

Context

Monoid theory

Algebra

Category theory

Contents

Definition

A comonoid (or comonoid object) in a monoidal category ℳ\mathcal{M} is a monoid object CC in the opposite category ℳ op\mathcal{M}^{op} (which canonically becomes a monoidal category via the same tensor product operation as in ℳ\mathcal{M}).

With the usual definition of monoids as having a unit, this means that a comonoid CC is equipped with a counit, which in string diagram-notation for ℳ\mathcal{M} is of this form:

\begin{tikzcd}[row sep=15pt] C \ar[d, phantom, \multimap{rotate=-90, scale=1.8}, {\scalebox{co-unit}}{xshift=16pt, yshift=6pt}] \ {} \end{tikzcd}

One speaks of a unital comonoid (or unital comonoid object; internal to Vect also called an augmented coalgebra) if CC is in addition equipped with a morphism η:I→C\eta \colon I \rightarrow C

\begin{tikzcd}[row sep=15pt] {} \ar[d, phantom, \multimap{rotate=90,, scale=1.8}, {\scalebox{unit}}{xshift=10pt, yshift=-4pt}] \ C \end{tikzcd}

which verifies the properties that the unit would verify if CC was a bimonoid, ie. in string diagrams:

Examples

\begin{example} (coassociative coalgebras) A comonoid object in VectorSpaces (with its usual tensor product of vector spaces) is called a coalgebra.

(Beware though that the term “coalgebra” is overused in many ways, for instance in coalgebras for endofunctor?. To be more specific to the linear-algebraic context one can say coassociative coalgebra.) \end{example}

\begin{example}\label{InACartesianMonoidalCategory} (cartesian comonoids) \linebreak Every set carries a unique structure of a comonoid in the category of Sets with respect to the usual cartesian product.

Generally, every object X∈𝒞X \,\in\, \mathcal{C} in a cartesian monoidal category (𝒞,*,×)(\mathcal{C}, \ast, \times) becomes (see also there) a (cocommutative) comonoid by taking the

The analogous statement remains true for cartesian monoidal (infinity,1)-categories (see there). \end{example}

Obvious as Exp. \ref{InACartesianMonoidalCategory} may be, it plays a somewhat profound role in various contexts:

\begin{example} (suspension coring spectra) \linebreak In the case of topological spaces or other models of classical homotopy types, and using that the suspension spectrum-construction is a strong monoidal functor, Exp. \ref{InACartesianMonoidalCategory} implies the remarkable fact that suspension spectra carry coring spectrum-structure via smash-monoidal diagonals.

\end{example}

(co)monad nameunderlying endofunctor(co)monad structure induced by
reader monadW→(-)W \to (\text{-}) on cartesian typesunique comonoid structure on WW
coreader comonadW×(-)W \times (\text{-}) on cartesian typesunique comonoid structure on WW
writer monadA⊗(-)A \otimes (\text{-}) on monoidal typeschosen monoid structure on AA
cowriter comonadA→(-) A⊗(-)\array{A \to (\text{-}) \\ \\ A \otimes (\text{-})} on monoidal typeschosen monoid structure on AA

chosen comonoid structure on AA
Frobenius (co)writerA→(-) A⊗(-)\array{A \to (\text{-}) \\ A \otimes (\text{-})} on monoidal typeschosen Frobenius monoid structure

Revision on February 6, 2026 at 04:54:04 by Kourouklides See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.