Consider the following test scenario:
create or replace package x is
--%suite(suite x)
--%suitepath(foo.bar)
--%test(feature a)
--%disabled
procedure test_a;
--%test(feature b)
--%disabled
procedure test_b;
end;
/
create or replace package y is
--%suite(suite y)
--%suitepath(foo.bar)
--%test(feature c)
--%disabled
procedure test_c;
--%test(feature d)
--%disabled
procedure test_d;
end;
/
Running the following code in the worksheet
set serveroutput on size unlimited
execute ut.run('plscope:foo');
produces a result similar to:
foo
bar
suite y
feature c [0 sec] (DISABLED)
feature d [0 sec] (DISABLED)
suite x
feature a [0 sec] (DISABLED)
feature b [0 sec] (DISABLED)
Finished in .008275 seconds
4 tests, 0 failed, 0 errored, 4 disabled, 0 warning(s)
In the realtime reporter the result looks like this:
I see the following problems:
- The suite description is
suite y for the nodes foo, bar, y. It's correct for x only. For the other nodes foo and bar the description should be aggregated. Either something like suite y; suite x (order according position in the tree).
- The option
Show description (if present) is not honored for the nodes x and y (see also output of the worksheet).
suite x should be shown instead of xsuite y should be shown instead of y
Consider the following test scenario:
Running the following code in the worksheet
produces a result similar to:
In the realtime reporter the result looks like this:
I see the following problems:
suite yfor the nodesfoo,bar,y. It's correct forxonly. For the other nodesfooandbarthe description should be aggregated. Either something likesuite y; suite x(order according position in the tree).Show description (if present)is not honored for the nodesxandy(see also output of the worksheet).suite xshould be shown instead ofxsuite yshould be shown instead ofy