Hi David. From the archives [https://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/2014-February/001472.html] you mentioned:
"My immediate next goal would be to release a stable version. So my sense is that we should not try to do new features, but first get something out that works again."
Is there a rugged definition of "that works again"? Assuming Python for .NET worked in the past, what year would I be in, what OS would I be using, and what versions of Python and .NET would I have installed?
Hi David. From the archives [https://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythondotnet/2014-February/001472.html] you mentioned:
"My immediate next goal would be to release a stable version. So my sense is that we should not try to do new features, but first get something out that works again."
Is there a rugged definition of "that works again"? Assuming Python for .NET worked in the past, what year would I be in, what OS would I be using, and what versions of Python and .NET would I have installed?