diff --git a/‎plugins/code-review/commands/code-review.md‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 37 deletions b/‎plugins/code-review/commands/code-review.md‎
Lines changed: 9 additions & 37 deletions
@@ -52,18 +52,12 @@ Note: Still review Claude generated PR's.
 
 6. Filter out any issues that were not validated in step 5. This step will give us our list of high signal issues for our review.
 
-7. Post summary comment FIRST using `gh pr comment` (if `--comment` argument is provided):
-   - Total number of issues found
-   - Brief one-line summary of each issue (no "Bug:" prefix)
-   - Or if no issues: "No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance."
-
-   When writing your comment, follow these guidelines:
-   a. Keep your output brief
-   b. Avoid emojis
-   c. Link and cite relevant code, files, and URLs for each issue
-   d. When citing CLAUDE.md violations, you MUST quote the exact text from CLAUDE.md that is being violated (e.g., CLAUDE.md says: "Use snake_case for variable names")
-
-8. THEN post inline comments for each issue using `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment`:
+7. If issues were found, skip to step 8 to post inline comments directly.
+
+   If NO issues were found, post a summary comment using `gh pr comment` (if `--comment` argument is provided):
+   "No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance."
+
+8. Post inline comments for each issue using `mcp__github_inline_comment__create_inline_comment`:
    - `path`: the file path
    - `line` (and `startLine` for ranges): select the buggy lines so the user sees them
    - `body`: Brief description of the issue (no "Bug:" prefix). For small fixes (up to 5 lines changed), include a committable suggestion:
@@ -93,40 +87,18 @@ Notes:
 
 - Use gh CLI to interact with GitHub (e.g., fetch pull requests, create comments). Do not use web fetch.
 - Create a todo list before starting.
-- You must cite and link each issue (e.g., if referring to a CLAUDE.md, include a link to it).
-- For your final comment, follow the following format precisely (assuming for this example that you found 3 issues):
+- You must cite and link each issue in inline comments (e.g., if referring to a CLAUDE.md, include a link to it).
+- If no issues are found, post a comment with the following format:
 
 ---
 
 ## Code review
 
-Found 3 issues:
-
-1. <brief description of bug> (CLAUDE.md says: "<exact quote from CLAUDE.md>")
-
-<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context, eg. https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/1d54823877c4de72b2316a64032a54afc404e619/README.md#L13-L17>
-
-2. <brief description of bug> (some/other/CLAUDE.md says: "<exact quote from CLAUDE.md>")
-
-<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context>
-
-3. <brief description of bug> (bug due to <file and code snippet>)
-
-<link to file and line with full sha1 + line range for context>
-
----
-
-- Or, if you found no issues:
-
----
-
-## Auto code review
-
 No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance.
 
 ---
 
-- When linking to code, follow the following format precisely, otherwise the Markdown preview won't render correctly: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/c21d3c10bc8e898b7ac1a2d745bdc9bc4e423afe/package.json#L10-L15
+- When linking to code in inline comments, follow the following format precisely, otherwise the Markdown preview won't render correctly: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/c21d3c10bc8e898b7ac1a2d745bdc9bc4e423afe/package.json#L10-L15
   - Requires full git sha
   - You must provide the full sha. Commands like `https://github.com/owner/repo/blob/$(git rev-parse HEAD)/foo/bar` will not work, since your comment will be directly rendered in Markdown.
   - Repo name must match the repo you're code reviewing