Skip to content

Use type-specialized comparators in list.sort() like CPython's listsort.c #8450

Description

@kangdora

Summary

Follow-up to #8421. The sorting algorithm now matches CPython's powersort, but every comparison still goes through full rich_compare_bool dispatch. Most of CPython's remaining speed advantage on list.sort() comes from its pre-scan type specialization, not from the algorithm itself.

Details

CPython's listsort.c scans the list once before sorting and, when every element is the same exact type, swaps the generic safe_object_compare for a direct comparison function that skips method dispatch entirely:

  • unsafe_long_compare for int
  • unsafe_latin_compare for latin-1 str
  • unsafe_float_compare for float
  • unsafe_tuple_compare for tuples of the above

Plan for RustPython:

  • Implement the pre-scan and specialized comparators in do_sort (crates/vm/src/builtins/list.rs), where the comparison closure is built — crates/vm/src/sorting.rs stays generic over is_lt.
  • When key= is used, apply the scan to the key vector instead of the elements.
  • Correctness guard: any subclass (which may override __lt__) must fall back to the generic path, matching CPython's exact-type check.

The O(n) scan is negligible next to the O(n log n) comparisons it speeds up. I'd validate with benchmarks across sizes (1k / 100k / 1M) and element types (int / float / str / arbitrary objects).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions