Skip to content

feat(managed-agent): add reliable ACTIVE Workspace deletion (L3) - #13354

Merged
doudouOUC merged 29 commits into
mainfrom
codex/workspace-session-l3
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

doudouOUC merged 29 commits into
mainfrom
codex/workspace-session-l3

Conversation

@doudouOUC

@doudouOUC doudouOUC commented Oct 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

[Latest R2 correction / 最新 R2 修复] e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2 — after a READY binding is placed under storage maintenance, new Session admission now refuses exact 409 workspace_migrating before any late row, with current lifecycle authority retained. The exact clean commit passed build/typecheck and 32 targeted Broker tests, SpotBugs0 and production-scope Checkstyle0; independent frozen JDBC/H2 before/after proof confirms the correction. This is component verification, not full Linux/native-DB/physical Runtime/load acceptance. All other 10,830 blobs, main50 migrations and L3 V51 contents are preserved. All85 artifact items have separate decisions, and all103 threads are resolved with formal CHANGES_REQUESTED still retained. Actions and validation · Itemized response.

READY binding 安装 storage maintenance 后,新 Session 准入恢复精确拒绝,候选生命周期权威保留。精确 clean 提交 build/typecheck、Broker32项、SB0/生产范围 Checkstyle0,冻结 JDBC/H2 独立修前红/修后绿;不当完整 Linux/原生DB/Runtime实体/负载验收。其余10,830blob、main50迁移与L3V51内容不变,85项逐项处理、103线程已resolved,正式CHANGES_REQUESTED仍保留。新headCI尚pending,旧head绿灯不挪计。E2E原文65,532字符仅余4,无法放完整新前置链接,历史原样保留,新结果见行动表。


Current result / 当前结果 — df1ecdc

The latest follow-up fixes two native test fixtures that were incompatible with the retained lifecycle contract. The upgrade assertion now preserves every original value and explicitly checks all five added defaults. Deletion scheduling now proves that admission waits behind the record commit, releases the deliberately held row and checks the serialized result; the unchanged post-delete control still verifies journal suppression and writer-seal requirements. Only two test files changed, with production, migration, workflow, profile and timeout bytes preserved from a98d.

Exact clean df1ec build/typecheck/Java test-compile plus Checkstyle each ran once, all exit 0. Independent actual compiled native methods passed 3/3 once, retry 0; original a98d failures reproduced 2/2 once. Local MySQL 8.4.11/macOS differs from CI MariaDB 10.11.18/Linux. Compiling 156 test sources is not a unit suite; cached production Checkstyle is not test lint/coverage. No complete native/Server/Core/CLI/Harness/Broker/SDK suite or new bundle was run for this follow-up. All seven schemas and the identity-verified owned instance were normally retired; no historical resource operation.

The original a98d MariaDB job failed with one assertion failure and one 1205 lock-wait error among 125 native cases. Separately, a98d Qwen Code CI workflow/suite reports failure while its complete fresh job list shows six success/three skipped and only warning annotations; cause remains unknown. This fixture fix does not claim remote CI success or fix that status discrepancy. No CI reruns. All 102 review threads are resolved; formal CHANGES_REQUESTED remains. Two consecutive clean self-audits and independent exact source/evidence review support this normal push only; maintainer approval, architecture/load assessment and complete physical Linux/Spring acceptance remain pending.

本次修复两个与现有生命周期契约不兼容的原生测试夹具:升级保持全部原值并精确检查五个新增默认字段;删除调度正向证明等待记录提交、释放原 held row 后检查串行结果。相邻删除后日志抑制/writer-seal 控制不变。仅两个 test 文件变化,生产/迁移/workflow/profile/timeout 与 a98d 全字节相同。

精确 clean df1ec build/typecheck/Java test-compile+Checkstyle 各一次 exit 0;独立 actual compiled 三 method 各一次绿、原两失败各一次红、retry 0。MySQL 8.4.11/macOS 不冒充 MariaDB 10.11.18/Linux;156 为编译测试源而非 suite,缓存生产 Checkstyle 不当 testlint/coverage。未新增完整 native/Server/Core/CLI/Harness/Broker/SDK suite 或 bundle。七 schema 和核验身份的新实例正常永久退休,零历史资源操作。

原 a98d MariaDB native125 项为 1failure/1error,后者 1205 lock wait;另旧 Qwen CI workflow/suite failure 与六成功/三跳过 job 汇总不一致,warning annotations 不解释根因,保留 UNKNOWN,不声称本修复解决或远端全绿。未 rerun。102/102 线程 resolved、剩 0,正式 CHANGES_REQUESTED 保留。两轮干净自审及独立 exact review 仅确认必要正常 push;维护者批准/O(history) tenant 串行架构负载和完整实体 Linux/Spring 验收仍 pending。L3 V51、main50 迁移、原凭据/claim/writer/ACL/Runtime/drain/unknown/protocol0/L2 围栏与范围不变。

All earlier result sections below remain complete history with their original head attribution. 以下全部旧结果保留,按各 head 的原始归属解读。


Current L3 delivery: a98d534 — W1c integration and safe capability-read correction

This closes the confirmed exception path when a lifecycle capability reader retains a client that generation adoption has closed: the read now fails closed while protocol1 support and absent-protocol0 behavior remain unchanged. It also preserves W1c storage admission/recovery contracts, resolves the real migration collision by moving only the unpublished L3 migration to V51, and fixes a reproduced placement/retention lock inversion with the existing two locks in one order. All50main migrations and maintainer history are retained.

Scope remains idle ACTIVE local hosted-workspace-files/1. Close completes End; Delete completes End then Delete. Durable effects precede permanent DRAINING/detach; original binding, generation and full-handle stop evidence precede atomic retirement. Issued credentials, current claim, writer/ACL/cwd checks, originalRuntime identity and indefinitely blocked unknown outcomes remain. Store/coordinator deploy first, Harness later; there is no authorization404 fallback or separate feature switch. L2 CLOSED/ARCHIVEDdelete and protocol0 recovery remain independent. No replacementRuntime replay, files2/Shell/MCP/CSI/channel lifecycle, H4b/L4 or physical erasure is added.

Reviewer behavior: check that supported protocol1 still advertises lifecycle, absent protocol remains unsupported, and a closed retained capability client returns unsupported without escaping an exception or granting authority. Check concurrent existing migration replay and current-claim lifecycle cleanup serialize without a placement/retention cycle and retain original identities/receipts. Deployment readers should account for the Store-first mixed window already described below.

Exact a98d final gate ran once:build/typecheck/Servercleanverify+explicitCheckstyle all exit0; Server1367total=1366pass/1existingmacOSskip/0failerror,SpotBugs0. Checkstyleempty production XML is not testlint/coverage. Independent frozen actual-client baseline/final and new-unit old-production negative evidence validate the bounded exception fix; actual adoption uses a deterministic retained-reader-reference surrogate, not observed concurrent publicHTTP500. Exactd0aa six green stages and two selected native outcomes remain parent evidence, not a98d reruns. No new bundle/SDK/Core/CLI/Harness/Broker/fullnativeDB suite; SDK compilation and bundle retain their historical attribution. The final summary records all30 new review dispositions and exact counts; formal CHANGES_REQUESTED remains until a maintainer changes it.

The current-head CI status will be recorded in the action report. Old4f94 inherited formatting failure and prior CLI red/unknown results are not declared repaired by this change. FullLinux/Spring restart, physical mount/host/boot/PID, neighboring holders, all crash boundaries, completeDB/load acceptance remain pending. O(history) and tenant serialization are real costs needing maintainer architecture/load review; local passing cases do not establish those acceptance claims.

当前L3:a98d534修复实际关闭client能力读取异常,仅新增精确异常分型返回false;协议1支持与协议0缺省保持。W1c真实冲突/V48碰撞最小整合,未合入L3迁移顺延V51且main50迁移逐字节保留;实际placement/retention锁环只重排既有两锁。原Runtime/claim/credential/writer/ACL/cwd/永久DRAINING/unknown阻塞、L2与protocol0、Store先Harness后/无404fallback保持,不扩files2/Shell/MCP/CSI/channel/H4b/L4或物理擦除。

a98d唯一最终3门禁全exit0,Server1366通过/1既有macOSskip;静态空XML不当testlint/覆盖。独立真实client修前红/修后绿及新编译测试配旧生产类红证明此有界修复;保留真实adoption加reader旧引用替身限制,不称公共500实测。d0aa门禁/native是父提交历史,不挪计本head新执行。旧格式失败/CLI红未知未称修复;完整Linux/Spring/物理停机/全DB/负载仍待,O(history)/tenant串行成本仍需维护者架构负载判断。

Historical 4f94 description and evidence follow verbatim; their head/gate attribution remains historical:


Latest integration / 最新整合 (4f94b0c): main's Hosted Workspace context change created two real conflict files with three regions. The merge retains lifecycle authorization and original Runtime fences with main's context fields and named dependencies. Context remains an ordinary read, without lifecycle execution authorization or original Runtime stop proof; scope stays idle local hosted-workspace-files/1, preserving V48/protocol-zero/L2/current claim/writer/ACL/cwd/unknown and permanent DRAINING. No files/2, Shell/MCP/CSI/channel lifecycle or L4 expansion.

Exact clean 4f94 validation is mixed: eight stages once, seven exits0 and CLI exit1 (1570total =1567pass/2fail/1skip, retry0). Build/typecheck/bundle/resolved-file format/ESLint, packaged Harness9/9 and Broker targeted transport20/20+Checkstyle passed. No new Broker SpotBugs/full suite, Server/SDK/Core/native suites. Two inherited macOS /var versus /private/var fixture assertions each reproduced red; separately labeled canonical-fixture controls each passed with assertions retained. Fixture cleanup is deferred as nonCritical, not original greens or product repair. Five original contract arms passed independently once against frozen emitted JS with mock Broker/Store/local journals and one actual local Harness HTTP current-claim control; 200/503/200/204 bodies captured. All source/output/freeze hashes unchanged and five owned PIDs/roots/one listener retired. Exclusions and overlapping tests are not additive coverage; physical Runtime/Java transaction/Linux/Spring/crash/load acceptance remains pending.

Pushed 732c CI Lint job112691863599 failed the inherited main-only event-schema document's Prettier step. Its complete log and exact checkout were read; it is a real nonCritical format blocker, not infra/flake, not fixed by this merge. No unrelated document/CI/timeout edits or CI rerun. Later main H6a e31 adds fourteen non-overlapping paths, leaves schedule/automation_run disabled and introduces no migration collision; only static merge was audited, no additional sync or hypothetical-tree build/test.

最新4f94合并main Workspace context真实两文件三区域冲突,保留原生命周期授权/Runtime围栏与命名依赖;context只属普通读取,不授lifecycle执行/停机证明,L3仍仅闲置本地files/1、V48/protocol0/L2/currentclaim/writer/ACL/cwd/unknown/永久DRAINING保留,不扩files2/Shell/MCP/CSI/channel/L4。精确八阶段各一次7个exit0/1个exit1:CLI1570=1567pass/2fail/1skip/retry0,其他build/typecheck/bundle/定向format/ESLint/Harness9/Broker20+Checkstyle通过;没有新BrokerSB/整套或Server/SDK/Core/native suite。原两macOS路径别名夹具各一次红,独立规范化控制各一次绿、断言保留,按nonCritical延期且不称原绿/产品修复。新增5原契约方法各一次通过,冻结实际JS+mock/localjournal和一项实际本地Harness HTTP currentclaim四响应200/503/200/204;hash不变、5自有PID/root及端口清理。排除/重叠不追加coverage,实体Runtime/Java事务/Linux/Spring/crash/load仍pending。732c真实CI Prettier继承main文档阻塞完整日志已读,非infra/flake,不称此merge修复、不改无关CI/timeout或重跑。后续H6a e31零PR重叠/迁移、domain仍关闭,仅静态审计不追加同步。

The separate bilingual action/validation report preserves current results and the 732c integration below. Formal CHANGES_REQUESTED and maintainer architecture/load judgment remain outstanding; O(history) and tenant serialization are real. Old verification remains under its original commit, including the unknown 732c Write-continuation failure, 805c CLI red and reconstructed G3 boundary, 2c4 partial independent parameter and inherited Shell-test exclusion.


What this PR does

Adds reliable deletion for idle ACTIVE hosted-workspace-files/1 Sessions through the existing public and WebShell routes. ACTIVE close runs SessionEnd only and retains data. ACTIVE delete settles SessionEnd before SessionDelete, verifies their committed outcomes, permanently drains the original Runtime, and atomically commits retirement, the tombstone, operation completion and terminal event. CLOSED/ARCHIVED deletion remains the independent L2 path; detach runs neither lifecycle Hook.

Admission establishes a durable lifecycle-only fence. Only the current operation and live claim can advance lifecycle work in the original Workspace scope. Saved Hook outcomes and an intermediate effects receipt let successors resume without repeating a possibly started attempt. Unknown outcomes or unverifiable original stop identities remain recovery_blocked; expired leases, Harness 404 and a RELEASED label do not prove completion.

If only the Hosted Harness changes generation, the discovering lifecycle call now invalidates the old attachment and returns the generation error. The next delivery attempt renegotiates using the original operation and current claim. It does not redispatch within the discovering call or treat the new Harness boot as proof that the original Runtime stopped; ordinary takeover and lifecycle authority remain separate.

The current route acceptance registry also includes both internal lifecycle/ordinary authorization routes with valid writer requests and credential refusal assertions; future actor-role enforcement remains outside this slice.

Why it's needed

L1/L2 allow deleting a reliably closed Workspace Session but leave ACTIVE deletion unavailable. The prior Harness close call also ran SessionDelete, which conflicts with close retaining the Session's data. This completes the L3 slice with separate close/delete Hook semantics and durable recovery across lifecycle, attachment and original Runtime cleanup.

Reviewer Test Plan

How to verify

  1. On both public and WebShell surfaces, delete an idle ACTIVE files Session as its creator with current read access. Expect 202 and a queryable operation, DELETING while cleanup is pending, then a hidden tombstone and readable completed operation after verified original stop. Shared Workspace data and neighboring Sessions must remain available.
  2. Configure SessionEnd and SessionDelete Hooks. Close should run End only; ACTIVE delete should settle all End children, including async children, before Delete starts. Detach and CLOSED/ARCHIVED L2 deletion must add no lifecycle Hooks.
  3. Replay the same actor/key before and after completion; expect the original operation. A readable non-creator should receive 403, and accepted/running/cancelling/approval-waiting Turns should receive 409 turn_active. Ordinary input, warm, acquire and control must remain fenced after admission.
  4. Interrupt delivery around Hook results, effects receipt, detach, stop or tombstone completion and let a newer claim take over. Completed outcomes must be reused, stale claims must not advance, and no replacement Runtime generation may replay effects. Unknown results or missing original stop evidence must retain CLOSING/DELETING with recovery_blocked.
  5. Revoke execution access between End and Delete. Already dispatched work may settle, undispatched work must stop, and restored authority may resume without repeating End. Previously admitted protocol-zero close must still finish under its original identities; L2 deletion must work without Harness availability.

Evidence (Before & After)

Before: baseline Public/WebShell ACTIVE files DELETE returned 409 session_state_conflict, admitted no operation and advertised no delete support. After: actual HTTP/JDBC fixtures accept 202, persist the lifecycle fence/effects receipt and atomically complete retirement plus tombstone. Actual TS authority connected to Java Store verifies a definite rolled-back ACL refusal remains retryable on the same authority, and an original protocol-zero live Harness attachment can close while ordinary input stays fenced. This is an API change with no TUI change; the global and bundled CLI have no Hosted lifecycle command. A separate E2E comment records exact coverage and physical validation limits.

Tested on

OS Status
🍏 macOS ⚠️ local final scoped gate and directed verification; unpublished candidate CLI red retained; historical HTTP/Store and native MySQL evidence linked
🪟 Windows ⚠️ not tested locally
🐧 Linux ⚠️ physical Hosted Harness/worker identity, mounts, stop and shared bytes not validated locally

Environment (optional)

Historical exact clean732c1ac final validation is mixed: ten stages ran once, nine exit0 and original CLI exit1. Build/typecheck/bundle, changed-file format/ESLint, Core1139/1139, packaged Harness9/9, Broker targeted4/4 with explicit Checkstyle, and Server clean verify with explicit Checkstyle passed. Server1334 total=1333pass/1 existing macOS skip, zero failures/errors,106XML; SpotBugs0 BugInstance. Server default-production Checkstyle0 errors/0 file nodes, Broker0 errors/1 file node; no test-lint/file-coverage or new BrokerSpotBugs/fullSDK/nativeDB-suite claim. The real H4a conflict required combining one import region; no function body was manually changed. Both child production domains remain disabled, all47 main migration sources byte-exact, L3V48 content unchanged/48 versions unique.

Original CLI3-file run294 total=293pass/1fail/0skip/retry0 remains red. The unchanged Write-continuation method had no expected history field; original HTTP response status/body and root cause are unknown. Its only independent original-method diagnosis passed637.740ms once/retry0 with one worker/coverageoff, compared with original two-worker/v8. Both history responses captured200 and pendingTurn original-to-null; NOT_REPRODUCED is not infra/flake, a repaired-test claim or all-green CI. The observer recorded15 terminal status records and11 bodies; four synchronous status bodies were unobserved and two DELETE URLs were Express-mutated. No case was resent;270 excluded names are not coverage. Dependent stages stopped on the original red, then only three previously unexecuted stages continued after source/diagnostic/cleanup review and fresh guards.

Independent frozen emitted-Core verification: VERIFIED_FIXED_WITH_ORIGINAL_CLI_RED_LIMITATION, four arms each once/retry0. Original-call identity, resource closure and the actual disabled-domain guard overlap Core; first two enable domains only in original test mocks, not production. The fourth typed no-append refusal is a deterministic model over actual compiled authority/local journal, not StoreHTTP or lifecycle/Runtime proof. Source10803/actual8407+freeze8407/32 unique emittedJS origins were hash-stable; four new PIDs/four roots absent. The separate diagnostic source10803/actual17719+freeze17719 stayed stable; four PIDs/one root absent and11 ports closed. Full Linux/Spring/nativeDB/physical/crash/load acceptance remains pending. No historical database was restored. Earlier2c4 and all prior candidates below remain historical attribution rather than this head's reruns.

Historical2c4 validation: Node22, Java21 and isolated Maven cache. Exact clean2c4036c final gate: 5/5 exit0; build/typecheck/bundle/bilingual format and Server clean verify with explicit Checkstyle each ran once. Server 1325 total = 1324 pass / 1 existing macOS skip / 0 failure or error. Server SpotBugs0 BugInstance; Checkstyle0 errors; existing default production scope and empty XML (0 file nodes), no test-lint or file-coverage claim. Independent final registry validation: VERIFIED_WITH_INDEPENDENT_EXECUTION_PARAMETER_PARTIAL — Original mapping method once/retry0 PASS80/80; untouched original lifecycle parameter once/retry0 returned403 writer_credential_invalid with valid body and zero DB connections. Execution parameter dispatched once, then the private observer failed before assertions; no response status/body was saved and it was not resent. Root final Server XML separately proves both original new parameters green; this is not independent2/2. Source10794/actual1046+freeze1046/JAR119 hashes unchanged; four new PIDs absent and two temporary roots removed. No new SDK/Core/CLI/Broker/native DB full suite for2c4.

Unpublished805c candidate history is retained separately: build/typecheck/bundle/format/ESLint/Core106/106 passed, originalCLI1688pass/2fail/0skip/retry0 remains red (mismatched cancellation ECONNRESET/undefined response; anonymous auth takeover404vs200). The unchanged methods each passed once in one-worker/coverage-off diagnostics; original causes remain unknown, not proven infra/flake or fixed. Only then-unexecuted Java stages continued: SDK196pass9skip=205, Server1151pass1macOSskip=1152. No SDKSpotBugs; default production Checkstyle passed with emptyXML/no file coverage or test-lint claim. G3 fake-HTTP/actualSDK verification has an explicit reconstructed settle boundary: initial call invalidated client before observer NPE; full initial post-state/error was not saved, and only the remaining retry ran after reconstructed lazy-adoption state. Detach used continuous two calls. This is not an uninterrupted settle pair or physical Runtime/Store restart acceptance; related product sources stay byte-identical and those scenarios were not rerun as2c4. The preceding e792 fixture report and all prior candidates retain historical attribution. Earlier4270CLI1560/1 remains unknown/not rerun. Two reset clean audits and independent exact review do not replace maintainer approval or pending physical/load acceptance.

Risk & Scope

  • Main risk or tradeoff: request-scoped lifecycle authority crosses Harness, Session Store, SDK and Broker; this feature requires maintainer architecture review. Unknown side effects can block indefinitely by design, rather than risk duplicate dispatch or unverified deletion.
  • Not validated / out of scope: real Linux workers and host/boot/PID stop identity, actual Hook commands and mount revocation, physical shared files/history/Artifacts and neighboring holders, and separate-server crash coverage at every physical boundary remain pending. Shell/MCP profiles, UI controls, physical erasure and force deletion are excluded.
  • Breaking changes / migration notes: add V48 after main’s V40 creator, V41–V44 CSI/dispatch, V45 task journal, V46 cwd-change and V47 H5 channel route/delivery migrations, preserving all main migrations byte-for-byte, and default historical operations to protocol zero. The unmerged L3 SQL moved from V47 to V48 without content changes. Main’s /2 search profiles remain available for ordinary Turns while L3 lifecycle admission remains files/1 only; staged H5 channel contracts and persistence do not enable channel execution or lifecycle effects. This integration does not add CSI, Shell or MCP lifecycle support. Directory changes refuse retained same-Session Runtime context at admission and commit; the original context is preserved. Reads of old operations tolerate an absent protocol column as zero while preserving a present one; this is not an execution-authorization fallback. Main’s provisioned writer credential is required before lifecycle/ordinary authorization and lifecycle-aware writer state checks; original expired/SEALED cleanup grants do not bypass this credential policy. Upgrade every Spring coordinator/Store first, then Hosted Harnesses; there is no separate L3 enable switch. During the mixed-version interval ordinary Turns remain available, while ACTIVE Workspace close/delete are temporarily unavailable until the Harnesses support the protocol. A new Harness against an old Store refuses all hosted Turns, including private Sessions; a missing authorization route is not permission. Missing protocol support rejects new operations without legacy DELETE fallback. Do not roll back to old coordinators while L3 operations are unfinished. Previously admitted operations retain their original protocol, and L2 deletion adds no Harness dependency.

Design: English · 简体中文. Both versions are complete and synchronized, including decisions, recovery limits, rollout and acceptance criteria.

Linked Issues

Refs #13164 (L3 only; L4 remains open). Builds on merged #13135, #13194, #13129 and #13084. Unknown-effect recovery limitations remain tracked by #13133.

中文说明

本 PR 的改动

通过既有 public 和 WebShell 路由,为空闲的 ACTIVE hosted-workspace-files/1 会话提供可靠删除。ACTIVE close 仅运行 SessionEnd 并保留数据;ACTIVE delete 先完整结算 SessionEnd,再运行 SessionDelete,核验其已提交结果,永久排空原 Runtime,最后原子提交退役、墓碑、operation 完成与终止事件。CLOSED/ARCHIVED 删除仍走独立的 L2 路径;detach 不运行两种生命周期 Hook。

准入建立持久的生命周期专用围栏,只有当前 operation 与有效 claim 能在原 Workspace scope 推进生命周期工作。已保存的 Hook 结果和中间 effects receipt 允许接管者恢复,避免重复派发可能已经开始的尝试。结果未知或原停机身份无法核验时保持 recovery_blocked;租约过期、Harness 404 或 RELEASED 状态不能证明完成。

仅 Hosted Harness 发生代际变化时,发现错误的生命周期调用会使旧 attachment 失效并返回代际错误;下一次交付沿用原 operation 和当前 claim 重新协商。发现错误的调用内不再次派发,也不把新 Harness boot 当作原 Runtime 已停机的证明;普通 takeover 与生命周期 authority 保持独立。

当前路由验收注册表也登记两个内部生命周期/普通授权入口,以有效writer请求核验凭据拒绝;未来actor-role强制执行仍不属本切片。

为什么需要

L1/L2 允许删除已可靠关闭的 Workspace 会话,但仍不支持 ACTIVE 删除。此前 Harness 的 close 调用还会运行 SessionDelete,与 close 保留会话数据的语义冲突。本 PR 完成 L3 切片,将 close/delete 的 Hook 语义分开,并为生命周期、attachment 与原 Runtime 清理提供持久恢复能力。

评审测试计划

如何验证

  1. 在 public 和 WebShell 两个入口,用当前可读的创建者删除空闲 ACTIVE files 会话。应返回 202 和可查询的 operation,清理期间保持 DELETING;核验原停机证明后,墓碑会话不可读取,已完成 operation 仍可读取。共享 Workspace 数据及邻居会话应保留。
  2. 配置 SessionEnd 和 SessionDelete Hook。close 只运行 End;ACTIVE delete 必须等待 End 的全部子执行,包括异步子执行,完整结算后才能开始 Delete。detach 和 CLOSED/ARCHIVED 的 L2 删除均不新增生命周期 Hook。
  3. 在完成前后重放相同 actor/key,应返回原 operation。可读的非创建者应返回 403;已接纳、运行中、取消中或等待审批的 Turn 应返回 409 turn_active。准入后普通输入、warm、acquire 和 control 持续受围栏约束。
  4. 在 Hook 结果、effects receipt、detach、stop 或墓碑提交边界中断交付,让新 claim 接管。已完成结果必须复用,旧 claim 不能推进,也不能创建替代 Runtime 代际重放副作用。unknown 或缺少原停机证明时应保持 CLOSING/DELETING 与 recovery_blocked。
  5. 在 End 与 Delete 之间撤销执行权限。已派发工作可以结算,未派发部分必须停止;恢复权限后可以继续且不重复 End。升级前接纳的 protocol-zero close 仍应沿原身份完成;L2 删除应不依赖 Harness 可用性。

前后证据

变更前:baseline 的 public/WebShell ACTIVE files DELETE 返回 409 session_state_conflict,不接纳 operation,也不宣告删除支持。变更后:真实 HTTP/JDBC 夹具返回 202,持久保存生命周期围栏和 effects receipt,原子完成退役与墓碑。实际 TS authority 连接 Java Store 验证了明确回滚的 ACL 拒绝不会破坏同一 authority 的重试能力;原 protocol-zero 的存活 Harness attachment 可以完成 close,而普通输入仍被围栏阻止。这是 API 变更,没有 TUI 变化;全局和本地 bundle CLI 都没有 Hosted 生命周期命令。独立 E2E 评论记录准确覆盖范围与物理验证限制。

本地测试平台

OS 状态
🍏 macOS ⚠️ 本次精确门禁/定向验证;保留未推候选CLI红;历史HTTP/Store及nativeMySQL见报告
🪟 Windows ⚠️ 本地未测试
🐧 Linux ⚠️ 本地未验证实体 Hosted Harness/worker 身份、挂载、停机及共享字节

环境

732c历史精确clean最终验证保留混合结果:十个阶段各一次,9个exit0、原CLI1个exit1。build/typecheck/bundle/改动文件format与ESLint、Core1139/1139、打包Harness9/9、Broker定向4/4显式Checkstyle、Servercleanverify显式Checkstyle通过。Server1334total=1333pass/1既有macOSskip,0fail/error,106XML,SpotBugs0。Checkstyle默认生产范围Server0error/0file node,Broker0error/1file node,不当testlint/文件coverage,没有新BrokerSpotBugs/整套SDK/nativeDBsuite。本批真实H4a冲突仅手工组合一个import区域,没有手改函数体;两个child生产domain仍关闭,main47迁移逐字节保留,L3V48内容不变/48版本唯一。

原CLI3文件294total=293pass/1fail/0skip/retry0仍红。未改动Write恢复方法缺少预期history字段,原HTTPstatus/body及根因未知。唯一独立原方法诊断单worker/coverageoff一次/retry0通过637.740ms,与原two-worker/v8不同;两history采集200,pendingTurn原prompt→null。NOT_REPRODUCED不证明infra/flake、测试已修复或全CI通过。旁观记录15终态status/11正文,4同步status正文未捕获、2DELETE URL被Express改写,不重发补采,270名称排除不计coverage。原红已停止依赖动作,源码/诊断/清理独立审查及freshguard后只继续此前未执行三个阶段。

独立冻结emittedCore验证VERIFIED_FIXED_WITH_ORIGINAL_CLI_RED_LIMITATION:四项各一次/retry0通过。原call身份、资源闭包、真实disabled-domain guard前三项与Core重叠不相加;前两项仅原mock打开domain,不开生产domain。第四项为实际编译authority/local journal上的确定性typed无追加拒绝模型,不是StoreHTTP/生命周期/Runtime证明。10803source/8407actual+freeze/32unique emittedJS origin hash不变,4新PID/4root absent。独立诊断10803source/17719actual+freeze hash不变,4PID/1root absent、11portclosed。完整Linux/Spring/nativeDB/实体/crash/load验收仍pending,没有恢复历史数据库。下文2c4与所有旧候选仅保持历史归属,不当本head重跑。

2c4历史验证:Node22、Java21、隔离Maven缓存。精确clean2c4036c最终门禁:5/5 exit0;build/typecheck/bundle/双语format/Servercleanverify显式Checkstyle各一次。Server 1325 total = 1324 pass / 1 existing macOS skip / 0 failure or error. ServerSpotBugs0 BugInstance、Checkstyle0 errors; existing default production scope and empty XML (0 file nodes), no test-lint or file-coverage claim。独立新registry验证VERIFIED_WITH_INDEPENDENT_EXECUTION_PARAMETER_PARTIAL:原mapping方法一次/retry0通过80/80;未执行过的原lifecycle参数一次/retry0以有效body返回403 writer_credential_invalid,数据库连接零。execution参数已派发一次,私有observer在断言前失败,未保存status/body且未重发;root实际Server XML另证明原两个新参数通过,不能称独立2/2。10794source/1046actual+1046freeze/119JAR hash不变,四新PID不存在、两临时root移除。。没有新2c4 SDK/Core/CLI/Broker/nativeDB整套重跑。

未推805c候选仅作历史:build/typecheck/bundle/format/ESLint/Core106/106通过;原CLI1688pass/2fail/0skip/retry0仍红(取消身份ECONNRESET/responseundefined;匿名auth takeover404vs200)。未改动method在单worker/关闭coverage诊断各一次通过,原根因未知,不称infra/flake或已修复。当时仅继续未执行Java:SDK196pass9skip=205、Server1151pass1macOSskip=1152,SDK无SpotBugs;Checkstyle默认生产范围通过,空XML无文件覆盖/不当testlint。G3实际SDK+假HTTP验证明确settle重建边界:首次已清client后observerNPE,完整原post-state/error未保存;仅剩余重试在重建lazyadoption状态后执行,无同内存连续settle两调用证明。detach连续两调用通过。不是实体Runtime/持久Store/restart验收;对应生产源码仍逐字节相同,不重跑或挪计为2c4执行。前一e792夹具报告及所有旧候选保持历史归属。4270CLI1560/1仍未知/未重跑。reset两轮干净自审与独立exact评审不替代维护者批准/待完成物理负载验收。

风险与范围

  • 主要风险或权衡:请求级生命周期权限跨越 Harness、Session Store、SDK 和 Broker,需要维护者架构评审。unknown 副作用按设计可以无限期阻塞,以避免重复派发或无证明删除。
  • 未验证及范围外事项:实体 Linux worker 与 host/boot/PID 停机身份、真实 Hook 命令和挂载撤销、物理共享文件/历史/Artifact 及邻居 holder,以及每个物理边界上的独立服务崩溃验证仍待完成。Shell/MCP profile、UI 控件、物理擦除和强制删除不在范围内。
  • 兼容与迁移:在 main V40 creator、V41–V44 CSI/派发、V45 task journal、V46 目录切换及 V47 H5 channel route/delivery 迁移之后新增 V48,逐字节保留 main 全部迁移,历史 operation 默认为 protocol zero。未合入的 L3 SQL 由 V47 顺延 V48,内容不变。主线 /2 搜索画像保留普通 Turn 能力,L3 生命周期准入仍仅 files/1;H5 channel 契约和持久化不启用 channel 执行或生命周期 effects。本次整合不增加 CSI、Shell 或 MCP 生命周期支持。同 Session 的 Runtime 上下文未释放时,目录修改在准入和提交均被拒绝,原上下文保留。旧 operation 缺协议列时仅按零协议读取,已有一协议保留;此兼容不构成执行授权 fallback。生命周期/普通授权及支持生命周期的 writer 状态校验前,须验证 main 签发的 writer 凭据;原 expired/SEALED cleanup grant 不绕过此凭据策略。先升级全部 Spring coordinator/Store,再升级 Hosted Harness;没有独立 L3 启用开关。混合版本窗口普通 Turn 可用,但 ACTIVE Workspace close/delete 在 Harness 支持协议前暂不可用。新 Harness 对旧 Store 缺失授权路由时拒绝所有托管 Turn,包括私有 Session;不能把缺失路由视为授权。缺少协议支持时拒绝新 operation,不回退到旧 DELETE。存在未完成 L3 operation 时不回退旧 coordinator。升级前已接纳的操作沿用原协议,L2 删除不增加 Harness 依赖。

设计:English · 简体中文。两版均完整同步,包含决策、恢复限制、启用顺序与验收标准。

关联 Issue

Refs #13164(仅 L3,L4 仍保持开放)。基于已合入的 #13135、#13194、#13129 和 #13084。unknown 副作用恢复限制继续由 #13133 跟踪。

Later main e92 H5a: fifteen record-contract paths, two existing PR overlaps. Static merge0 preserves all original L3 changes; overlapping added/deleted lines exactly equal main, no migration/capability/producer/lifecycle changes. Both channel domains remain disabled. This hypothetical tree was not built/tested and requires no additional L3 synchronization.

后续main e92 H5a共15记录契约路径、2个PR重叠;staticmerge0,重叠增删源码逐行等于main并保留原L3围栏,无迁移/执行权威/producer/生命周期改变,channel两个domain仍关闭。假想tree未build/test,无需追加L3同步。

Current-head CI update: the later complete snapshot is 17 pass / 6 pending / 8 skipped / 1 fail. Actual current-head Lint job112714656364 checked out4f94b0c and failed only Prettier for the inherited daemon event-schema document; its complete688340-byte/4003-line log was read and independently audited. The document is byte-exact the integrated main version. This real nonCritical formatting blocker remains individually deferred under the Critical-only scope; no infra/flake, source repair or rerun is claimed. The dependency advisory audit failed with npm audit ENOLOCK/missing npm lockfile, despite a successful step status; the wrapper's unreachable-endpoint report does not prove a network outage or completed audit. Downstream sensitive/i18n/schema/closure gates were skipped. The local CLI red gate, formal CHANGES_REQUESTED, pending CI and physical acceptance limits above remain. Details: #13354 (comment) .

当前提交CI更新:更晚完整快照17通过/6等待/8跳过/1失败。真实当前head Lint job112714656364 checkout4f94b0c,仅主线继承的daemon event-schema文档Prettier失败;688340字节/4003行完整日志已读并独立审计。文档与已整合main逐字节相同,按Critical-only范围逐项延期并保留真实格式阻塞,不称infra/flake/产品修复,不重跑。依赖advisory审计实际npm audit ENOLOCK/缺少npm lockfile,wrapper的端点不可达报告不能证明网络故障,也不能以步骤成功称审计完成;后续敏感/i18n/schema/closure门禁跳过。本地CLI红gate、正式CHANGES_REQUESTED、待终态CI和物理验收限制保持。详细行动表链接同上。

@doudouOUC

doudouOUC commented Oct 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

df1ecdc
a98d534
4f94b0c result / 结果

2c4036c result / 结果

e792060 result / 结果

ba79b85:H0c整合;EN/中报告

4270/V48:H5整合;CLI1560通过/1 ECONNRESET原因未知,定向1/1;组件/升级各2/2。Full results/完整结果

2d5a13a — W2/V47

已整合实际 main,修复原 owner 上下文与旧协议列读取;Server1092通过/1既有skip。独立19控制、5组件及2迁移路径通过;新head CI待终态,完整实体部署验收仍待完成。Full evidence / 完整验证与历史归属: #13354 (comment)

2026-10-06 — 1d16b9c

Main H3 conflicts integrated; unchanged L3 SQL is V46. Refused detach preserves the wake scheduler. Exact final gate 11/11 passed, independent frozen component/native migration checks passed. Full Linux/deployment/load acceptance remains pending; previous 3649 CI failures are not claimed fixed.

主线 H3 必要整合,原 L3 SQL 顺延 V46;授权拒绝保留 wake scheduler。精确门禁 11/11 和独立冻结组件/原生迁移验证通过,完整 Linux/部署/负载验收仍待完成;不称旧 CI 已修复。

Complete bilingual actions/evidence / 完整双语行动证据

Latest exact delivered commit: 3649f88c15c944e25a33068d9f9fae89b51993f7 (normal push; preserves maintainer merge history). R4-1 fixes native receipt/completion lock inversion; N1 fixes first definite ordinary admission409 poisoning cached writes while prior503 uncertainty remains fenced. Seven Critical responses; all87 bilingual actions and detailed verification.

Unique final gate: build/typecheck/bundle,45 migrations,format/lint; Core133,CLI502pass/4existingcgroup skips,Harness9retry0,Server1007pass/1existingLinux-onlymacOS skip,0fail/error; Checkstyle/SpotBugs0. Frozen actual-final nativeMySQL2/2 and SDK→productionSpringHTTPStore/H2 three scenarios3/3 passed. Old-class negative controls fail as expected, not product passes. OwnedMySQL63247/52404 stopped/root removed,18CREATE/DROP matched; ownHTTPJVM66421 exited/H2 destroyed. No broad SDK/Broker/MySQL/MariaDB rerun. Full Linux Hook/catalog/physicalmount/boot/PID/neighbor/crash and load acceptance remain pending; no maintainer approval claim. New-head CI will be checked separately. Entire previous head history follows unchanged.

中文:最新交付3649常规推送,修复真实receipt/完成锁反转和首次明确409错误停写;先503不确定响应仍围栏。精确最终门禁及原生产物MySQL2例、真实HTTPStore3场景均通过;5项既有平台skip保留,无失败,未挪用旧head计数。自有数据库/进程已清理,18schema创建删除匹配,未操作历史资源。完整Linux物理/全部崩溃及负载验收仍待完成,正式评审未dismiss;以上两链接提供87项逐条处置。此前所有head历史完整保留如下。

[codex] L3 Hook-owner restart 20261005 — exact a85d0828d97632a310ddc83d0b00da1952790871, parent 0ddcd1128dd0937e8b29c26d6ab83e926d36fead.

Item Action and reason
F1 / R3-1 Fixed the independently reproduced stale Hook-owner cache after embedded Broker restart: acquire the saved original binding/generation before new lifecycle dispatch leaves intent. Original Runtime Session, current claim/ACL and transactional fences remain. Failed preflight leaves intent; uncertain effects stay blocked.
F2 Document all Store/coordinators first, Harness second, no enable toggle, temporary ACTIVE Workspace close/delete loss in the mixed interval; decline missing-route authorization fallback. Both designs and PR note match.
F3 Preserve maintainer #13403 and CSI integration. Maintainer's contention measurements describe its rig; no speculative lock redesign or acceptance claim for all workloads.
N1 / N2 Defer non-critical label/OpenAPI refinements after the review cutoff; existing R3-32/R1-14 reasons remain.
N3 / N4 Retain capability support semantics and no-catalog Store receipt/detach; record catalog reachability and separate Hook verification accurately.
Linux matrix Still pending as a whole: Docker/Colima unavailable here. Actual component fallback below does not replace it or reattribute maintainer111/111 to this head.
Hosted/MySQL CI Full0dd job111899072545 log read: the action exceeded its12-minute step limit just after Maven reported BUILD SUCCESS(12:02 elapsed), with no suite failure/error reported. Subsequent fault/failover/latency checks were skipped. This is not a complete Hosted gate pass; no cause proven as flake, no timeout change or old-head rerun.
Windows CI Read full0dd job111899072968 logs: inherited CSI elapsed-deadline assertion fails. Direct transport/test/POM/workflow are main-identical; no concrete L3 cause found, no flake claim, timeout weakening or rerun. New-head CI must be judged separately.

Exact clean commit's unique final gate: build/typecheck/bundle,45 unique migrations,changed-file ESLint/format,CLI502passed/4existing cgroup skips(506 total),packaged Harness9passed,retry0,zero failures/errors. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and an exact-commit independent cross-package source review found no confirmed Critical in this fix. Four focused unit invocations were3red/1unknown-control green before the fix and4green after; excluded declarations are not coverage. No Java/core source or Flyway resource changed from0dd, so no additional broad Java/SDK/MySQL/MariaDB gate is claimed.

Independent test-engineer verification of the exact frozen a85 bundle:6 actual scenarios with118 named behavior/cleanup assertions, separate from unit counts;15934 frozen files and119 dependency hashes checked, with10 actual Java component load origins per scenario. Same-owner and fresh-Broker-owner Close/Delete each preserved the original binding/generation/worker lease, ran End once (and Delete once for Delete), returned the same replay receipt and made no further dispatch or lifecycle warm. An injected original-owner409 refusal left child intent/reason null with zero dispatch/endpoints; same-authority retry and replay settled End once. A real owned-worker death after End endpoint observation and Hook-execute200 running acknowledgement produced status503/runtime_provision_failed and persisted recovery_blocked/outcome_unknown; another fresh connector attempt stayed503 without resending. This is lost terminal status after worker death, not a dropped initial Broker HTTP reply; no second persisted-row snapshot is claimed. These are actual packaged Harness/worker, HTTP Hook endpoints, Java Store/H2/Broker/connector components with a manual Controller bridge and synthetic macOS host/boot shim, not a whole Spring JVM restart or Linux matrix.

中文独立验证:精确a85冻结bundle的6个实际组件场景、118项行为/清理断言全部通过,与单元测试计数分开;15934产物文件/119依赖哈希及每场景10个实际Java类加载来源已核验。原/新Broker owner的Close/Delete保留原binding/generation/worker lease,End一次、Delete对应Delete一次,重放receipt相同且无新增派发/warm。恢复409拒绝留在intent、零派发;同授权重试后一次完成。End端点已观察且派发获200 running后,仅终止自有worker,status503使持久unknown保持阻塞,第二fresh connector503且不重发;这是丢失终态,不是丢失首次HTTP回包,仅有重试前持久行快照。H2/手工Controller bridge/macOS身份shim限制明确,不替代Linux/Spring实体验收。

All this stage's owned resources were cleaned: all18 newly owned Java/Harness/worker PIDs confirmed absent;6 stage roots and6 Harness roots removed; no historical resources reused, no database server created or restored. No historical MySQL was operated or restored. All old evidence remains historical; full physical Linux Hook/catalog, mount/host/boot/PID, shared Workspace neighbor holders and every independent-service crash boundary remain acceptance work. Journal O(history) and tenant serialization still require deployment-load review.

Provenance: full PR diff SHA256 9ed9a380411809c75fb2186020c50a51c15fa374a94da58a1fb7b95e23cf3aea, bundle SHA256 cd5c60d99f33a3a001b3d30c48766f4a2eb0927f0dedec0e51d41f0d17040987; evidence .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-hook-owner-20261005-* and .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-real-stack-20261005-1739-test-engineer/.

Thread result after per-item reply: reopened R3-1 resolved1/1; total54/54 resolved, remaining0, with every thread/comment page checked. Previous inline reply retained without duplication; formal CHANGES_REQUESTED is not dismissed. New-head CI remains separate from this local gate; retry budget0/3, no CI retry or Ready/Draft change.


中文:a85d0828d97632a310ddc83d0b00da1952790871 在原0dd上常规提交,不改维护者历史。F1 在新生命周期 Hook 派发前按原 binding/generation 恢复 Broker owner,保留 Runtime Session、claim/ACL、事务围栏;恢复拒绝保留 intent,unknown 不重放。F2 明确先全部 Store/coordinator 后 Harness、无单独开关及混合版本 ACTIVE close/delete 暂不可用;不绕过缺失授权。F3 保留维护者主线修复与其环境性能证据。N1/N2 非 Critical 延期,N3/N4 按既有支持与 catalog/无catalog语义处理。

精确干净提交唯一最终门禁:build/typecheck/bundle,45 unique migrations,changed-file ESLint/format,CLI502passed/4existing cgroup skips(506 total),packaged Harness9passed,retry0,zero failures/errors。两轮连续干净自审、独立精确提交跨包评审无本批已证实 Critical。四项定向回归修前三红/一未知结果控制绿、修后四绿;未跑项不计覆盖。本批 Java/Core/迁移未改,不挪用0dd旧 Java/SDK/MySQL/MariaDB计数。本机无 Docker/Colima,实际 H2/macOS 身份 shim/Broker重建组件验证不能替代完整 Linux/Spring重启 matrix。旧0dd Hosted/MySQL步骤在Maven成功后超过12分钟limit、后续检查跳过,不称完整job通过;Windows CSI deadline失败亦已读完整日志,原因未确证为flake,未改timeout/CI或重跑;新head另看实际CI。

重新打开的 R3-1 修后解决1/1,总54/54、剩余0;不重复旧 inline,不 dismiss CHANGES_REQUESTED,不切 Ready/Draft。维护者111/111保留为 c65/de70 外部历史;实体物理验收和负载评审仍待完成。全部本阶段自有资源清理,禁止恢复所有历史数据库。

All prior head evidence / Earlier verification history

[codex] Follow-up: maintainer F1/F2 received 2026-10-05T17:39:29Z (comment 5999809406). The earlier snapshot phrase "no new actionable external review" is superseded. F1 pinned-catalog close/delete after Spring/Broker restart is under reproduction; the completed CSI gate and synthetic routing controls do not establish this path. R3-1 has been reopened. F2 will state Store/coordinator-first, Harness-second rollout with temporary ACTIVE Workspace close withdrawal; missing authorization still fails closed. Prior exact-head evidence below remains historical.

中文:维护者新反馈 F1/F2 正在复现与核实;原汇总“无新增外部行动项”已被新证据覆盖。CSI 门禁不能证明带 Hook 的重启链路通过。R3-1 重新打开,升级顺序将明确先 Store/coordinator 后 Harness,中间 ACTIVE Workspace close 暂不可用。下文原精确 head 证据保留为历史。


[codex] L3 CSI/main integration 20261005-1708 — exact 0ddcd1128dd0937e8b29c26d6ab83e926d36fead

Main's CSI change caused three Java conflicts and occupied V41–V44. This commit preserves maintainer merge de70a07332e50d4736c7a9e9b791de4e60900b8d as first parent and main 69d5db2ff2424da01ac6f14e4c484773aae7204c as second parent. No maintainer history is rewritten. L3 remains limited to idle local hosted-workspace-files/1; no CSI lifecycle or L4 support is added.

Action Result and reason
Migration collision Move unmerged L3 V41 to V45, with identical SQL SHA256 0eb9b3be141b4b83bbcf81c6972b1795890a00e92ee171ceba4cc1bb61416f4b. All42 main SQL migrations are byte-identical; final43 SQL plus Java V15/V29 =45 unique versions. Bilingual designs and PR rollout notes agree.
Transport conflict Keep claim-aware L3 Hook/ordinary authorization and CSI saved-original ACK as separate flags. Generic routes retain their original rejection of the CSI workspace exception.
Store/Broker conflicts Keep original credentials/current claim/writer, cleanup-only expired/SEALED authorization and complete original stop-proof checks, alongside main's same-DataSource and atomic uncancelled dispatch admission. Original already-cancelRequested dispatch still settles without worker execution/cancellation.
Upstream test contract Adapt three resolver mock/read checks to the actual two-argument authorization API. Refusal assertions and no HTTP/ownership interaction remain. Initial stale-target and pre-fixture-fix failures are retained as failures.
Existing feedback No new actionable external review. Prior R1/R2/R3 fixes and individual deferrals/rejections remain unchanged; no duplicate replies or new inline threads.

The exact clean commit's unique final gate passed: build/typecheck/bundle;45 unique migrations; Core168/168; CLI498 passed +4 cgroup-dependent skips; packaged Harness9/9 retry0; Broker718 passed +2 conditional skips (Linux local-process and opt-in Kubernetes worker); Server1007 passed +1 existing Linux-only macOS skip. Zero failures/errors. Broker/Server clean builds, explicit Checkstyle0 and actual SpotBugs0. SDK source/resources were unchanged; its broad suite was not rerun. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and independent exact-commit cross-package static review found no confirmed Critical; this is not maintainer approval.

Independent final-artifact verification passed actual JUnit11/11 (CSI5 + real MySQL lifecycle6), Hook-routing4 controls, actual Broker/JDBC-H2 cancellation3, real MySQL V31/V40→V45 upgrades2, and bounded public HTTP70 assertions. V31 drain compatibility uses a post-upgrade old-binary-style insert; V40 preserves a pre-upgrade drain row. Both retain protocol-zero original CLOSE receipt/drain semantics and45 applied migrations. The first private Hook fixture construction failed before reaching product controls; corrected controls passed and the failed setup remains recorded. All2,542 frozen artifact files and119 dependency hashes remained unchanged.

Only this round's new MySQL8.4.11 PID15010/port56651 was used: executable/datadir/socket/port/PIDfile and server identity verified, normal shutdown/exit0,8 matching schema CREATE/DROP pairs, PID exited, root /private/tmp/qwen-l3-csi-sync-lfllbnwq removed. Own HTTP/JVM/H2/listener resources were cleaned. This and all historical databases must not be restored.

These are selected methods and synthetic controls, not a full MySQL/MariaDB suite, R3 re-reproduction, real Kubernetes deployment or complete physical L3 acceptance. Full Linux Hook/catalog, entity Harness/worker, mount/host/boot/PID, same-Workspace shared files/neighbor holder and every independent-service crash boundary remain unverified. O(history), tenant serialization and maintainer architecture/deployment-load review remain relevant. Global/bundle help is reachability only.

Thread status: new addressed/resolved0/0; complete thread and per-thread comment pagination retains54/54 resolved, remaining0. Formal CHANGES_REQUESTED remains intact; no review dismissal or Ready/Draft transition. Prior dispositions remain in R3 full table and R2 full table. No CI/timeout changes or retries. New-head remote CI is separate from this local gate.

Provenance: full PR diff SHA256 f2d482645b007a38a9c8f4af9f77d93b3256f002e5dd3f3e2d7baf92f28d34fe; bundle SHA256 5bf3d4e4d4274039afda1b01f29512d3cc7b54711ed3e7ea43130365009fdb92. Evidence: .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-csi-sync-20261005-1708-* and .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-csi-sync-20261005-1708/test-engineer/.


中文:main CSI变更产生三处Java冲突并占用V41–V44。精确提交0dd以维护者de70合并为第一父提交、main69d5为第二父提交,保留已有历史,不重写或合入GitHub PR;L3仍仅支持闲置本地hosted-workspace-files/1,不增加CSI生命周期或L4。

行动 结果与理由
迁移碰撞 仅将未合入L3 V41顺延V45,SQL SHA2560eb9b3be…16f4b不变;main42SQL逐字节保留,最终43SQL+V15/V29两项Java共45唯一版本。中英设计与PR迁移说明同步。
Transport冲突 Hook/current-claim授权与CSI原身份ACK使用独立参数;普通路径不获得CSI workspace例外。
Store/Broker冲突 保留签发凭据/current claim/writer、expired/SEALED仅清理及全部原停机证明,并保留main同DataSource和未取消派发原子准入;已cancelRequested原执行仍可0worker执行/取消地结算。
上游新夹具 三处mock/核验改为实际双参数授权契约;拒绝断言及无HTTP/ownership调用保留。最初脏构建资源和修前mock失败均保存,不能算通过。
已有反馈 无新增外部评审行动项;R1/R2/R3原修复、逐项拒绝/延期理由有效,不重复回复或制造inline。

精确干净提交唯一最终门禁:build/typecheck/bundle、45迁移唯一,Core168、CLI498通过/cgroup4skip、打包Harness9 retry0、Broker718通过/条件2skip、Server1007通过/既有Linux专用macOS1skip,零失败/错误;Java clean、显式Checkstyle0及实际SpotBugs0。SDK源码/资源未变,本轮未重跑其完整suite,不混用旧计数。两轮连续干净增量自审和独立跨包静态评审无已证实Critical,不代替维护者批准。

测试工程师在最终冻结产物上验证实际JUnit11/11(CSI5+真实MySQL6)、Hook路由4控制、真实Broker/JDBC-H2取消3、V31/V40→V45真实MySQL升级2及公开HTTP70断言。V31 drain是升级后旧binary式insert,V40为升级前原行;保留protocol-zero原CLOSE/receipt/drain及45已应用迁移。私有Hook夹具首次构造失败尚未到产品控制,修正夹具后通过并保存失败;2,542产物和119依赖哈希均未变。

新建自有MySQL PID15010/port56651核验身份后正常shutdown、PID退出、root移除,8schema CREATE/DROP匹配;自有HTTP/JVM/H2/listener清理完毕,无历史数据库操作。禁止恢复本轮或历史实例。只是选定方法与合成控制,未重跑完整MySQL/MariaDB或R3复现,不是实际Kubernetes/完整Linux实体L3验收。真实Hook/catalog、实体Harness/worker、mount/host/boot/PID、同Workspace共享文件/邻居holder及全部独立进程崩溃验收仍待完成;O(history)/tenant串行成本与维护者架构/负载评审仍相关。

新处理/resolve0/0,总54/54线程已resolved,剩余0;正式CHANGES_REQUESTED保留,无dismiss/Ready/Draft切换。没有CI/timeout改动或重跑,新head远端CI需另行确认。

All prior head evidence / Earlier verification history

[codex] Current remote head / 当前远端 head: de70a07332e50d4736c7a9e9b791de4e60900b8d (snapshot 2026-10-05T17:02:11.960908+00:00). Maintainer Shaojin Wen merged main 91cf9ed6c0a515ce001a608901484aaed0efd219 into delivered c65e46d04e61cd8483f90f4d93ef43dfb5598876. This maintenance did not create that merge or rewrite it; the clean workspace was fast-forwarded only. Its tree exactly matches the automatic merge, all40 main migration files are byte-identical and L3 V41 is unchanged. The only two overlapping production changes are main's comment relocation and first-attachment/client ReentrantLock; L3 lifecycle methods and ordinary/passive admission prefix remain byte-identical. This is static integration evidence, not a local build/test of de70.

The earlier c65 Lint job111873408446 failed the trusted lint-gate freshness check because main updated scripts/lint.js in6b878e1a04ec70a35f8d14125fb3aafea4fb8973; ESLint/test stages were skipped. Full failed-job logs were read. No CI code was modified and no run was retried. After the maintainer merge, de70 job111877635435 has actually passed that freshness step; the full job and other CI remain in progress. Current check snapshot: 16 passed, 9 pending, 8 skipped, 0 failed. OPEN/Ready, MERGEABLE/BLOCKED, CHANGES_REQUESTED,54/54 threads resolved and0 remaining. No new external review feedback; own32 replies,32 empty reviews and two summaries are ignored. Retry cycles0/3 on this new head. All local gates and independent counts below apply only to c65, not de70.

中文:维护者将main91cf合入c65,最新远端为de70;本维护仅快进干净工作区,没有执行该merge或重写历史。合并树与自动合并完全一致,main40迁移及L3 V41保留;重叠生产diff是main注释移位及首次attachment/client的ReentrantLock,L3生命周期方法和普通/被动准入前缀逐字节不变。这里只是静态整合核验,未本地构建/测试de70。旧c65真实Lint失败为main新版门禁新鲜度要求,已读取完整日志,ESLint/test未执行;没有修改CI或重跑。de70实际已通过该新鲜度步骤,完整CI仍未完成。当前快照16pass/9pending/8skip/0fail;54线程均resolved,剩余0,正式CHANGES_REQUESTED未dismiss。下述本地门禁和独立复验仅属于c65;所有实体L3验收缺口及O(history)/tenant串行成本仍保留。


[codex] R3 20261005-1509 exact c65 results

Thread status:32/32 unique new threads replied and resolved after confirming each posted reply. Complete thread and per-thread comment pagination confirms54/54 total threads resolved, remaining0 (old22 + new32). Formal CHANGES_REQUESTED reviews remain intact; no review is dismissed and no approval is claimed. / 新32/32线程逐条核实回复后已resolved;完整线程及线程评论分页确认总54/54已resolved,剩余0(旧22+新32)。正式CHANGES_REQUESTED仍保留,不dismiss,不代表获批准。

Five independently reproduced correctness fixes: original idle attachment adoption/current-claim renewal and post-await ordinary fence; transactional typed Broker409 preservation; never-dispatched cancelled execution settlement through the fence; attachment identity before local409; confirmed SDK detach clears only captured attachment/prompt and preserves replacements. 五项真实缺陷已修复:原闲置attachment/currentclaim接管及晚到围栏、事务409保留、未派发取消结算、身份先于409、SDK原attachment/prompt确认清理且保留替代状态。

Review-body reply: #13354 (comment)

Complete54-item bilingual action table: #13354 (comment)

Exact delivered commit: c65e46d04e61cd8483f90f4d93ef43dfb5598876; parent facc4ab1f9bd1513a214e71a483032638377d7f0; base 69d060e24c3d7740e3f526ff4915d9caff031ede. Current actual main 85ea2358dc22150606dc5bb0d88185db0f829102 merges without conflict and adds no required L3 contract/migration integration, so this batch does not rebase. V41 SQL is unchanged, SHA256 0eb9b3be141b4b83bbcf81c6972b1795890a00e92ee171ceba4cc1bb61416f4b.

One final gate on this clean commit: build/typecheck/bundle and41 unique migrations; Core128, CLI456, packaged Harness9 retry0, SDK50, Broker641 (639 passed,2 existing macOS skips), Server777 (776 passed,1 existing Linux-only macOS skip). Zero failures/errors; explicit SDK/Broker/Server Checkstyle0 and actual Broker/Server SpotBugs0. Two consecutive clean reset self-audits and an independent12-file cross-package static review found no remaining confirmed Critical; this is not maintainer approval.

Independent final evidence: actual built Core renewal5; actual frozen bundle→Java Store/H2 and truly fresh Connector adoption9; actual Store/exception-handler typed409+rollback6; actual SDK HTTP6; actual Broker/JDBC-H2 cancelled-dispatch3 with fresh ordinary denial and0 worker execute/cancel; actual packaged identity HTTP15; actual committed source-copy/producer serializer late-preflight8. These are selected private probes/controls, not an additional full suite or physical L3 acceptance. Final counts exclude baseline red cases and all earlier heads. The late-preflight baseline was a saved intermediate pre-fix candidate, not a failure of c65 or a fence-removal mutation.

Ownership cleanup: renewal listeners/timers5 closed,7 own H2 SHUTDOWN, Harness/Java bridge/probe exited and own root removed,0 model requests. Secondary SDK servers/executors and Broker/H2 closed, packaged Harness PID13418 exited0/root removed; late barriers closed Express/journal roots. All executions exited0 and frozen inventories/class origins stayed unchanged. This round started no MySQL/MariaDB and never restored historical resources. Global CLI does not implement this hosted profile; help is reachability only.

Limits: synthetic admission/Hook records, mocked servlet handler for the typed409 boundary, synthetic ready Broker transport and source-copy late Hook barrier do not prove real Linux Hook/catalog/worker effects. Real Linux Harness/worker, mount/host/boot/PID, same-Workspace shared files/neighbor holders and all distinct-service crash boundaries remain unaccepted. Journal scan remains O(history), tenant serialization cost remains, and maintainer architecture/deployment-load review remains required. No L4, new profile, forced delete or physical erase is included.

Provenance: incremental diffSHA256 7d6f16b89c9199f7badc3da7afee6c4b124f36c6e9c684f2c166556a859e7925; fullPR diffSHA256 3cef953e455119366dd3fde569cc4e1bdf3ed25b31b146df286a636122fdbfe2; bundleSHA256 6d7be8d9ae1175a85dbbb7fd7eef6bbf88d6c6e08563d50a0ef9e8c5fa50722d. Evidence: .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-review-20261005-1509-final-{ts,java}-gate.json, observed-counts, self-audit-{1,2}, final-review; .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-review-20261005-1509-renewal/final-verification-summary.json and secondary/final-c65e46d0/verification-summary.json.

精确提交仅运行一次最终门禁:Core128、CLI456、打包Harness9(retry0)、SDK50、Broker641(既有macOS2skip)、Server777(既有Linux专用macOS1skip),零失败/错误;build/typecheck/bundle、41迁移唯一性、显式Checkstyle及实际SpotBugs均通过。两轮连续干净自审和跨包独立评审无剩余已证实Critical,不等于维护者批准。独立复验为续租5、实际bundle→Java/H2新Connector接管9、Store/handler409回滚6、SDK HTTP6、Broker/JDBC3、实际bundle身份15及冻结源码晚到预检8。只证明这些有界控制;真实Linux Hook/catalog、worker停机、mount/host/boot/PID、共享文件/邻居holder与全部独立进程崩溃边界仍待验收。没有MySQL/MariaDB重跑或历史资源恢复。O(history)与tenant串行成本保留,需维护者架构和部署负载评审。

Historical unpushed 12589510a98fd1471835491cffe31db146a3d676 failed the TypeScript fixture build (two Promise/Promise barriers), then only those two fixture types were corrected and audits reset before amending to c65. Its Java gate and all previous heads remain historical and are not mixed into the counts above. 中间125从未推送;失败历史保留,修正夹具类型后重置自审并以新精确c65验证。


Latest verified head: facc4ab — main conflict integration

[EN] Exact clean final head facc4ab1f9bd1513a214e71a483032638377d7f0, based on main 69d060e24. Nine HTTP fixture conflicts retain main explicit insecure opt-in; main Host confinement and all L3 production/Java/migrations/designs remain intact. One final gate: build/typecheck/bundle,41 unique migrations,fixture lint/format,Core124,CLI445,selected Host6,packagedHarness9 all pass retry0. No new Java/MySQL/MariaDB run; c06 results below remain historical. Independent actual built artifacts:18HTTP+8Host guard controls and4selected Session cases pass, no DB; owned processes/timers closed. Initial collector config failure not counted. Two clean self-audits and independent No findings. Bundle SHA256 09361be4fcc354f85c223a9f4fc9e69ffb20bf16316dd20f0d6029e7e8ac7c1a. Evidence .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-main-sync-20261005-0803-*, .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-main-sync-20261005-0803/{verification-results,provenance,resource-cleanup}.json, .qwen/issues/pr-13354-main-sync-20261005-0803.md. New-head CI is separate. No real model/Agent Host or physical Linux acceptance is claimed: full Hook/catalog, worker identity/shared-file/neighbor-holder/crash boundaries remain unaccepted.

[中文] 精确干净head facc4ab1f 基于main 69d060e24,九处夹具冲突采用main显式明文opt-in,保留Host围栏及L3生产逻辑/Java/迁移/双语设计。本提交唯一门禁build/typecheck/bundle、41迁移唯一性、夹具lint/格式、Core124、CLI445、Host选定6、打包Harness9全部通过retry0;未重跑Java/MySQL/MariaDB,不挪用c06历史计数。独立实际产物18HTTP+8Host guard控制、4个Session案例通过,自有进程/计时器清理,无数据库;首个collector配置失败不计通过。两轮干净自审与独立评审No findings。内部模拟/选定验证不能代替实际模型/Agent Host或真实Linux Hook/catalog、worker身份、共享文件/邻居holder及全部独立进程崩溃边界,新head CI须单独判断。

Previous head history preserved below / 以下完整保留历史head证据:


Latest verified head: c06a46f — R2 corrections and main credential integration / 最新精确交付验证

Commit: c06a46f2d15e0e82f8505b1fd9c8829fc2f95d17; main base 9766e722349a636b19691dbf53775a4fff68f04f; L3 V41 SQL byte-identical to the previous unmerged V40, main V32/V35–V40 preserved. The pre-sync 70afab4aa was never pushed and its verification is historical evidence only. / 已安全整合 main,L3 顺延 V41 内容不变;中间 70 未推送,不能算本 head 交付证据。

Eight reproduced R2 defects fixed: Hook successor/new-effects authority, typed claim 409, exact receipt/recovery PK queries, client identity before writer renewal, precise epoch claim expiry, same-boot SDK detach404 heartbeat cleanup and locked L2 DELETE classification. Six Store paths now validate main's configured writer credential before any state/claim/lock; original expired/SEALED cleanup still requires the credential and all original identity/claim/effects/DRAINING checks. / 八项复现缺陷和 main 凭据整合已修复,原生命周期与 L2 安全边界保留。

Exact clean commit's single final gate: build/typecheck/bundle, 41 unique Flyway versions, Core124, CLI445, packaged Harness9 retry0, SDK42, Broker640 (macOS2skip), Server774 (existing Linux-only macOS1skip), zero failures/errors; clean Java, explicit Checkstyle and actual Broker/Server SpotBugs0. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package No findings. / 精确最终提交唯一门禁通过,平台 skip 单列,未混入旧 head 结果。

Independent test-engineer verification on the exact final bundle and frozen 2,501 Java artifact files, with 14 key class-loading sources checked: 46/46 selected actual JUnit invocations (Store 23, SDK 12, real MySQL 3, Credential 8), zero failure/abort/skip; eight original concrete probes and three actual packaged Harness identity HTTP controls pass. Thirty invalid credential cases return exact 403 with zero JDBC calls; 52 H2 state controls retain issued-token ACTIVE authorization and original expired/SEALED cleanup only with the proper writer/claim/effects/DRAINING. Replacing only the final Store class with the frozen pre-fix main-integration class makes six identical credential regressions red while two existing controls remain green; these expected failures are negative controls, not product passes. MySQL verifies const/PRIMARY point queries, one target resource lookup with 24 historical Hooks, cross-tenant neighbor progress while the receipt transaction holds locks, precise expired-claim refusal and receipt rollback. Public-service CLOSE/DELETE concurrency accepts stale DELETE through L2 and replays the same operation. / 测试工程师在精确最终 bundle 和 2,501 个冻结 Java 产物上验证 46/46 实际 JUnit、八项原具体 probe、三项实际打包 Harness 身份 HTTP 控制。30 个非法凭据均 403 且 JDBC 调用 0;52 个 H2 状态控制保留签发凭据的 ACTIVE 授权及原 expired/SEALED cleanup 的严格 writer/claim/effects/DRAINING 边界。单点回退旧 main 整合 Store 类使六个相同回归变红,两项既有控制仍绿,不能将负向对照失败算产品通过。真实 MySQL 和公开服务并发见证通过,未重跑完整数据库 suite。

New owned MySQL 8.4.11 PID 96473, port 52163, root /tmp/qwen-pr13354-main-integration-mysql-5fq3etd0 was verified by executable/datadir/socket/port/PIDfile, shut down through its owned socket, confirmed exited and its root removed. Three actual selected JUnit schemas have matched CREATE/DROP. All 17 recorded owned processes exited; actual Harness/Java bridge roots/listeners, SDK executors and H2 fixtures were cleaned up. No historical instance was operated or restored. / 本阶段新建 MySQL 身份核验后正常 shutdown、确认 PID 退出并删除 root,三次实际 JUnit schema CREATE/DROP 匹配;17 个记录自有进程、Harness/Java bridge、SDK executor/listener 和 H2 均清理,没有操作或恢复历史实例。

Evidence: .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-main-auth-20261005-final-{ts,java}-gate.json, observed-counts.json, self-audit-{1,2}.md, final-review.md; .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-main-integration-20261005/final/{verification-results,provenance,loaded-class-provenance,resource-cleanup-provenance,mysql-schema-lifecycle}.json; .qwen/issues/pr-13354-review-20261005-0357.md. PR diff SHA256 039c02c13f44566ef24bef2af51209430996ff51c02d1cb44b95b2179f9f63cc; bundle SHA256 b3b33fc79c77edefa99677baaaf21b6e11a25f2bb78c8232e8e3c7a29a057927.

Limits: synthetic Hook receipts, selected Java/H2/MySQL/HTTP and packaged Harness controls; no full MySQL/MariaDB suite rerun or full physical L3 acceptance. Real Linux Hook/catalog, worker/mount/host/boot/PID, shared Workspace files/neighbor holders and every independent process crash boundary remain unaccepted. O(history) and tenant serialization remain, without fixed latency promise; maintainer architecture/deployment-load review remains required. Global/bundled CLI help establishes reachability only. / 实体 Linux、真实 Hook/catalog、mount/host/boot/PID、共享文件/邻居 holder 和全部独立进程崩溃边界仍待验收;本轮不能替代完整 L3 实体验收或维护者架构/部署负载评审,CLI help 仅可达性。


Latest review fixes: 9348d1f (2026-10-04 20:49 UTC heartbeat)

Exact clean commit: 9348d1fba8b615223ec4c94ce2df24cdf67eb81d, based on unchanged main 17c182eda0226844d7af533a52dd3ed8b956ee7b. The increment fixes database-epoch time-zone validation for legacy close claims, refuses pending/failed/cancelled local recovery routes before joining them, and fixes compact occurrence identities independently of the application's ObjectMapper formatting. V32 and main V35-V39 remain unchanged; L3 stays V40. The current main was fetched for conflict inspection; no conflict or migration collision required changing this reviewed/gated commit.

The single final gate on this exact commit passed build/typecheck/bundle, 40 unique migrations, CLI437 and packaged Harness9 with retries disabled, Broker640 (2 macOS skips), Server668 (1 existing Linux-only macOS skip), explicit Checkstyle and actual Broker/Server SpotBugs0, with zero failures/errors. SDK tests were not rerun in this increment. Counts use only each exact invocation log, excluding old Surefire reports. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package review: No findings. These are local final-gate results, not proof of new-head remote CI completion.

Independent test-engineer verification used the exact final bundle and 1,051 frozen Java class/resource artifacts: actual JUnit15/15 (real MySQL time-zone8, Hook receipt4, Broker3), plus original probes8+2+5. Both the old actual-class overlay and each single-fix mutation make the same final regressions fail: clock5/8 (3 aligned controls pass), Hook4/4, Broker2/3 (matching identity control passes). This is evidence that the tests detect the specific defects, not a claim that mutated code passed. The owned MySQL8.4.11 instance was identity-checked and shut down; PID exited, owned root removed, all24 JUnit schema lifecycles (8 final + 8 baseline + 8 mutation) and16 baseline/final clock-probe schema lifecycles matched CREATE/DROP. Owned JVMs, caller threads and H2 resources were released. No historical database was restored; no full MySQL/MariaDB suite was rerun.

Limits: Hook receipt tests use authoritative synthetic committed records in H2; Broker probes use a withheld real service acquire with process-local route-loss injection. The global CLI cannot launch this hosted profile, so the engineer used actual Java service/Store probes; bundled CLI help proves reachability only. This does not complete Linux physical Harness/worker, real Hook commands/catalog registration, mount/host/boot/PID, same-Workspace shared files/neighbour holders or all independent-process crash-boundary acceptance. Maintainer architecture and deployment-load review remains relevant.

Evidence is retained in .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-review-20261004-2049-final-{ts,java}-gate.json, l3-review-20261004-2049-observed-counts.json, the two self-audit records, independent final review, and .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-review-20261004-2049/final/{verification-summary,provenance,loaded-class-provenance,cleanup-evidence}.json. Full PR diffSHA256: 140dde5c8a26bf732de39cdcfea0cb1a2ff490ceee35698eb96e43a52c5381a0; bundleSHA256: 78180338f8d32e95a874fc020debb0e7c23ed845c468b027e0a2de8fe4a9030b.

[中文]
精确干净提交的唯一最终门禁通过:build/typecheck/bundle、40 个唯一迁移版本、CLI437、打包 Harness9(均 retry0)、Broker640(macOS2skip)、Server668(既有 Linux 专用 macOS1skip),零失败/错误;显式 Checkstyle 和实际 Broker/Server SpotBugs0。本轮没有重跑未改动的 SDK 测试。两轮连续干净增量自审及独立跨包评审 No findings。

test-engineer 使用精确最终 bundle 与 1,051 个冻结 Java class/resource 产物验证:实际 JUnit15/15(真实 MySQL 时区8、Hook receipt4、Broker3),原探针8+2+5全部通过。旧实际类 overlay 与每个单点回退都令同一最终回归变红:时区5/8失败(3个对齐控制通过)、Hook4/4失败、Broker2/3失败(匹配身份控制通过);没有把回退后的失败说成通过。自建 MySQL8.4.11 已核验身份后关闭,PID退出、目录删除;24个 JUnit schema 生命周期(最终8+基线8+回退8)及16个基线/最终 clock-probe schema 均匹配 CREATE/DROP。自有 JVM、caller 线程与 H2 已释放,没有恢复历史数据库或重跑完整 MySQL/MariaDB suite。

范围限制:Hook receipt 验证使用 H2 中合成的权威 committed 记录,Broker 使用真实 service acquire 在途与本地路由丢失注入;全局 CLI 不支持此 hosted profile,因此使用实际 Java service/Store 探针,bundle help 只证明可达性。Linux 实体 Harness/worker、真实 Hook 命令及 catalog 注册、mount/host/boot/PID、同 Workspace 共享文件/邻居 holder 和全部独立进程崩溃边界仍未验收。维护者架构与部署负载评审仍需要保留。


Latest CI fixture verification — 1ccfebfdf (2026-10-04)

Safe main sync retains its virtual-thread lock hardening and leaves V40 SQL unchanged. Final exact-clean-commit build/typecheck/bundle, forty unique migrations, CLI437 and packaged Harness9 retry0, SDK29, Broker638 (2 macOS skips), Server664 (1 existing Linux-only macOS skip), explicit Checkstyle and actual Broker/Server SpotBugs analysis passed. Two clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package review: No findings.

Independent test-engineer verification on the exact final bundle/Java artifacts: actual compiled MySqlIT via JUnit Launcher 15 found/started/succeeded, 0 failed/aborted/skipped on new owned MySQL8.4.11. Its general log confirms15 distinct BeforeEach schema creations and15 matching AfterEach drops. The original TS shared-mount witness passed independently (1 case, retry0); it uses a simulated Broker/local journal. Owned database PID69088 was identity-checked, normally shut down, exit confirmed and its root removed. This is local MySQL selected-method coverage, not the complete MariaDB suite or physical Linux acceptance. Saved provenance and cleanup are under .qwen/scripts/l3/pr13354-ci-fixtures-final-20261005/; final gate/self-audit/review records use .qwen/pr-reviews/l3-ci-fixtures-20261004-1542-*.

Still unexplained: the original075 remote PreToolUse first-status wait failed all three built-in attempts before cancellation. Exact frozen baseline original case and unchanged final full file passed locally. No timeout was changed, no flaky classification/retry used, and this remote symptom is not claimed fixed. Read the new head's Node/MariaDB CI separately; local gates do not establish remote success. Full real Linux Hooks, mount/host/boot/PID identity, same-Workspace shared files/neighbor holders and separate-process crash boundaries remain unaccepted. Prior head results below are historical coverage and are not added to this round's counts.

中文:修复两处CI夹具并同步main;新main锁结构与原L3 V40 SQL保留。精确提交门禁均通过(CLI437/Harness9 retry0/SDK29/Broker638/Server664)。测试工程师在精确最终bundle/Java产物上独立验证:实际编译MySqlIT经JUnit Launcher运行15 found/started/succeeded,0 fail/abort/skip;新建owned MySQL8.4.11 general log记录15个独立BeforeEach schema创建与15次匹配AfterEach删除。原TS共享mount见证独立1项retry0通过(模拟Broker/local journal)。owned PID69088核验身份后正常关闭、确认退出并删除root。仅这些选定方法,未重跑完整MariaDB/MySQL suite,也不代替Linux实体验收。 原Hook等待失败原因仍未定,未改timeout或未经证明重跑;新head CI独立读取,完整Linux实体验收仍待完成。


[codex] Agreed on the independently reproduced correctness issues; fixed in 075d36d. Follow-up to the review timeout: run 37181708516 exhausted its 21600-second budget without submitting a completed review or inline threads. Its unpublished partial tool output was treated as claims, independently checked against the actual 5f64304 head. Commit 075d36d contains the verified correctness fixes and is rebased onto main 98b0255.

Partial claim / observed issue Action and evidence
R1-6: Store failure prevents local cancellation Fixed. Independent HTTP reproduction showed network, 503 and writer-conflict errors blocked AbortSignal and left the admitted Turn active. Cancellation now remains authenticated and aborts the admitted Turn without ordinary Store authorization; the local lifecycle fence still rejects cancellation during lifecycle work.
R1-3: a successor with saved effects skips detach when its attachment cache is empty Fixed with current-claim, original-ID detach, instead of a recovery load. The baseline made zero detach requests and allowed three original writer renewals before completion blocked. A successor now contacts the original Session ID without create/load/Hook replay. Store retains scope/token/writer/generation, current claim and DRAINING checks; missing authority or a supplied wrong client ID cannot bypass authentication.
Expired / already SEALED original writer blocks cleanup Fixed. Cleanup accepts only the same original identity under the persisted current claim/effects/DRAINING fence, without renewal or journal append. It stops activation renewal and idempotently seals that writer. Ordinary/legacy close still records activation release; new Hook dispatch, journal commits and writer renewal retain their active, unexpired-writer requirements. Historical active activation is not normal-release proof; final completion still requires the original Runtime stop evidence.
R1-1: malformed journal records cause lifecycle scanner NPE Fixed. Five invalid shapes across ordinary, lifecycle-authority and fenced-settlement commits return the existing 400 invalid_managed_session_store_request, with journal revision/transactions/candidate resources rolled back. The independent baseline observed ten lifecycle-path NPEs; no real deployed HTTP500 claim is made.
R1-2 / R1-4 / R1-5: replacement Runtime, cached-authority reuse, scheduler deadlock Not adopted as PR-specific critical fixes: exact-code independent tracing did not establish those scenarios. Recovery uses the original binding/generation and Hook control substitutes per-request authority. Current main's separate renewal pool and guarded release were preserved; this does not claim all scheduler/contention concerns are solved.
R1-7: generalize Shell/MCP lifecycle loads Deferred with L4. Production L3 remains files-profile-only; no Shell/MCP lifecycle support was added.
R1-15, R1-19, R1-21/22/23/25 and broader coverage, naming, optimization or documentation suggestions Deferred under the approximately-five-review-round Critical-only rule in AGENTS.md. Confirmed defects receive focused tests; broad catalog/protocol-zero/controller/capability coverage, indexed effects lookup and additional OpenAPI descriptions are not represented as fixed. Existing Java tests do construct lifecycle authority and exercise claim/fence checks, so the absolute contrary claim is inaccurate; missing broader coverage remains a suggestion. Maintainer architecture/tenant-contention review is still relevant.
main conflicts and migration collision Resolved. Both public capability projections reuse main's batched retention result and preserve its approval/maySubmit path. Store retains L3 pre-dispatch ACL/fenced settlement before main's ApplyResult/activation-cache commit. Main Broker hardening is preserved. Main V32 and V35–V39 are byte-identical; unmerged L3 SQL moved V36→V40 without content changes, with synchronized English/Chinese design and PR notes.

An unpushed intermediate f41fa788 passed its local gates but failed independent actual packaged Harness→Java Store/H2 verification for expired/SEALED detach: after successful authorization it still attempted activation-release journal commits and returned 503. That result reset the audit and verification; the final change explicitly prevents the append rather than ignoring its failure or relaxing commit authority. Intermediate gate passes are not claimed as a delivered fix.

Validation on this exact clean commit: the unique final gate passed build/typecheck/bundle and Flyway uniqueness (40 migrations); Core 38, CLI 436 and packaged Harness 9 tests passed with retry=0. SDK HostedHarnessClient 28, Broker 637 (2 macOS skips) and Server 654 (1 existing Linux-only macOS skip) completed with zero failures/errors. SDK/Broker/Server clean builds and explicit Checkstyle passed; Broker/Server SpotBugs passed. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package/main-integration reviews found no confirmed defects; full PR diff hash a2fd7e0c1d8e0b823038921401a350427380793ee364a12551a64960cdbba798. No completed final stage was repeated for this commit.

Independent test-engineer verification is VERIFIED_FIXED on the exact final bundle and final SDK/Broker/Server class snapshots: three actual packaged cancellation scenarios, four isolated cancellation/lifecycle controls, fifteen real Store rollback transactions, four expired/SEALED identity controls, and six actual bundled Harness → final Java Controller/Store/H2 → fresh connector cleanup scenarios (CLOSE/DELETE × active/expired/SEALED). Each successor issued one original-ID detach, with no load/lifecycle/model call; CLOSE ended CLOSED with no retirement, DELETE ended DELETED with one retirement, and every original writer ended SEALED. Two further actual activation-renew requests were held before entering the Store transaction, then released after detach/completion: CLOSE returned 409 managed_session_writer_conflict and DELETE 409 tool_output_session_retired, with journal revision and transaction count unchanged at 2. The barrier held no database lock. All owned JVMs, Harness children, listeners and temporary roots were cleaned up; exact bundle SHA256 79a1f5524c78e4c998ff145ec4fce32e5534135890ca255f0031ed935454b1f4.

The bridge invokes real final Java Controller/Store transactions with a fixed owned tenant context, so Spring authentication filters are outside this probe. It uses H2, a fake model and no Hook catalog, and creates no physical worker. These affected-regression checks are distinct from full physical L3 acceptance.

Post-push bounded snapshot: MERGEABLE / REVIEW_REQUIRED, 5 passed, 19 pending, 0 failed on 075d36d; this is separate from local verification. No old-head CI retry was consumed; the verified code fix supersedes that head and starts fresh CI. Full pagination currently shows no submitted reviews, inline comments or review threads: resolved 0/0, remaining unresolved 0. These results do not substitute for maintainer approval.

Complete physical Linux acceptance remains pending: real lifecycle Hook commands, mount/host/boot/PID identity, same-Workspace bytes and neighboring holders, and every distinct-process crash boundary. Actual packaged processes with transport fixtures and actual Java Store/H2 transactions do not establish those deployment results. No MySQL/MariaDB suite was rerun in this batch and no historical database was restored. Unknown effects remain indefinitely recovery_blocked; no force-delete channel or L4 scope was added.


本轮跟进自动评审 21600 秒超时,没有正式已提交评审或 inline 线程。部分工具输出作为线索,在实际 5f64304 上独立核实后,仅修复确认的正确性问题;最终提交 075d36d 已同步 main 98b0255。已修复 Store 故障阻止认证取消、接管缓存为空时跳过 detach、非法 journal 在生命周期校验中 NPE,以及原过期/SEALED writer 清理阻塞。接管凭原 Session ID 和当前 claim 清理,不为恢复 client ID 加载 Runtime 或重放 Hook;永久围栏和清理授权通过后停续租、直接封存,不追加 activation release。普通/legacy close 仍记录 release,过期 writer 的新 Hook、journal 提交与续租仍被拒绝,完成仍核对 effects 与原 Runtime 停机证明。

未推送的中间 f41 提交虽通过本地门禁,但真实打包 Harness→Java Store/H2 联调发现过期/SEALED detach 仍追加 journal 并返回503;因此重置自审和验证,完成显式不追加的修复,没有吞掉未知提交错误或放宽写入权限。未证实的 Runtime/缓存权限/scheduler 指控未采纳;广泛覆盖、命名、性能、OpenAPI 文案等建议按约五轮后仅修 Critical 的规则延期,不扩大 L4。main 批量查询、activation 状态缓存、Broker 原子 release 与续租调度修复保留;V32、V35–V39 逐字节不变,L3 SQL 顺延 V40 且内容不变,双语设计与 PR 迁移说明同步。

精确干净提交的唯一最终门禁通过 build/typecheck/bundle、40个迁移唯一性、Core38、CLI436、打包Harness9(retry=0)、SDK28、Broker637(macOS跳过2项)、Server654(macOS既有Linux专用1skip),零失败/错误;clean构建、显式Checkstyle及Broker/Server SpotBugs通过。两轮连续干净增量自审和独立跨包/main整合评审无确认缺陷,完整PR diffhash为a2fd7e0c1d8e0b823038921401a350427380793ee364a12551a64960cdbba798。独立测试工程师在精确最终 bundle 和 Java 类快照上标记 VERIFIED_FIXED:实际打包取消3场景、独立取消/生命周期控制4项、真实 Store 回滚15场景、过期/SEALED身份控制4场景、实际 Harness→Java Controller/Store/H2→全新 connector 清理6场景(CLOSE/DELETE×active/expired/SEALED)。每次接管仅一次原ID detach,无load/lifecycle/model调用;CLOSE为CLOSED、退役0,DELETE为DELETED、退役1,原writer均SEALED。另两次真实activation续租请求在进入Store事务前暂停,清理完成后放行分别返回409 writer_conflict/session_retired,journal revision与事务数仍为2;屏障未持数据库锁。全部本轮自有JVM/Harness/listener/root已清理。桥接固定自有tenant,未覆盖Spring认证过滤器,使用H2、假模型且无Hook catalog/实体worker;本提交未重复已完成的最终门禁阶段。

推送后有界快照为 MERGEABLE/REVIEW_REQUIRED,新head 5通过/19待完成/0失败;与本地验证分开记录。当前线程 0/0、剩余0,旧 head 重试消耗0/3;新 head CI 单独跟进。完整 Linux 实体 Hook、mount/host/boot/PID、同 Workspace 共享文件与邻居 holder、全部独立服务崩溃边界仍未验收;实际进程加传输夹具和 Store/H2 不替代部署验收。本轮未重跑 MySQL/MariaDB suite,也未恢复旧数据库。unknown 仍可无限期阻塞,不增加强制删除。


Earlier validation history (each result applies only to its named head):

E2E verification update on final head 5f6430417d4a3b377c498107cd2a119e2ab54f49 (main 35616f3b6, 2026-10-04).

Synchronized with main 35616f3b643f6d87cc00112d961a0fbb448aca00 and pushed final head 5f6430417d4a3b377c498107cd2a119e2ab54f49 using a lease against the previous remote head. This resolves the merge conflict introduced by main's seven new commits, including persisted tool profiles and takeover recovery.

Item Action
Historical upgrade fixture conflict Retained main's direct historical-schema seed and completed close receipt, plus L3's protocol-zero assertion and L2 retirement coverage.
Duplicate V35 migration Preserved main's V35 tool-profile migration and V32. Renamed the unmerged L3 lifecycle migration to V36 with byte-identical SQL and unchanged historical protocol-zero/DRAINING defaults.
Prior L3 repairs Rebased all four commits; the three subsequent repair patches compare equal in range-diff. No L4 scope added.
Documentation Updated both design languages and the PR's migration notes.

Validation on this exact clean final commit: build, typecheck, bundle and the documented migration uniqueness guard passed; CLI 243 tests and packaged Harness 9 tests passed with retries disabled; SDK Hosted client 27 tests, Broker drain/HTTP 51 tests, Server 575 tests (zero failures/errors, one existing Linux-only test skipped on macOS), explicit Checkstyle and Broker/Server SpotBugs passed. Two clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package review found no confirmed defects. The guard's initial argument-less invocation exited with usage status 2; its corrected documented command passed, and no completed build/test stage was repeated.

The test engineer independently ran six actual final-artifact fixture invocations: five on a new owned MySQL 8.4.11 instance and one on H2. They cover V31/V34 upgrades, preserved close evidence and tool profiles, BLOCKED CLOSED/ARCHIVED deletion recovery, L3 atomic rollback/effects reuse and same/cross-tenant fences. The source/compiled migration inventory is 34 SQL + 2 Java = 36 unique versions, without a stale V35 lifecycle resource. The owned MySQL was identity-checked, shut down and removed. These selected cases do not represent a fresh full MySQL/MariaDB suite; CLI help only proves bundle startup.

No new review feedback required a reply; no inline threads exist (resolved 0/0, remaining 0). No CI rerun was requested. New-head remote CI is tracked separately from these local results. Full real Linux Hook commands, mount/host/boot/PID checks, shared Workspace files/neighbor holders and every distinct-process crash boundary remain pending; existing evidence is not promoted to complete physical L3 acceptance.


已同步 main 35616f3b6,使用旧远端 head 的 lease 推送最终提交 5f6430417,解决 main 新增七个提交带来的合并冲突。历史升级夹具保留 main 的旧 schema 直接建行、原 close receipt、持久 files profile 与 L2 退役断言,同时保留 L3 protocol-zero 断言。main 的 V35 工具配置迁移及 V32 原样保留,未合入的 L3 生命周期迁移顺延 V36,SQL 逐字节不变;双语设计与 PR 迁移说明已同步。此前三个修复补丁在 range-diff 中完全一致,不增加 L4。

该精确干净提交的 build/typecheck/bundle、迁移唯一性检查、CLI243、打包Harness9(禁用重试)、SDK27、Broker51、Server575及静态检查全部通过;Server零失败/错误,macOS仅跳过既有Linux专用1项。两轮增量干净自审和独立跨包评审无确认缺陷。迁移检查首次因缺少模块参数返回usage状态2;补全为仓库CI命令后通过,没有重复已完成的构建/测试阶段。

测试工程师对最终编译产物独立运行6次原夹具调用(5 MySQL、1 H2),验证旧schema升级、close证据及profile保留、CLOSED/ARCHIVED阻塞删除恢复、L3原子回滚/effects复用及租户围栏。源码/产物含34 SQL+2 Java共36个唯一迁移,已排除旧V35生命周期资源残留;新建owned MySQL已核验身份后关闭并清理。这不是完整MySQL/MariaDB suite重跑,CLI help只验证bundle启动。

本轮无新增评审需回复,线程0/0、剩余0,无CI重跑。远端新head CI单独跟进。完整Linux实体Hook、挂载/host/boot/PID、共享Workspace文件/邻居holder及全部独立进程崩溃边界仍未完成验收。

Historical validation on prior heads (retained; not rerun in this update)

L3 E2E and final-commit verification

Commit: d1982fa1e1d5d65153584c4966c5cba59ee4f9d8, based on main 2c591ecc08a6fa080342f9b1b9f7f43215178cbb. Locally verified on macOS with Node 22, Java 21, isolated Maven dependencies, H2 fixtures and a temporary MySQL 8.4 instance.

Check Result and evidence scope
Final committed tree Clean; L3 patch unchanged by rebase; two prior clean complete audits plus independent main-integration re-review with No findings
Root build, typecheck, bundle All pass once for the final committed tree before push
Directed TS tests Core 94 + CLI 312 = 406 pass; the CLI set includes main's new Shell receipt/cleanup regressions
Directed Java tests SDK 21 + Broker 170 + Server 79 = 270 pass; SDK/Server Checkstyle and applicable SpotBugs pass. Initial Broker verify omitted explicit Checkstyle; see the correction below
MySQL concurrency and rollback Earlier 30 pass, zero skipped. All SDK/Broker/Server source and test Git trees are identical to the tested implementation; this preparation round did not restart or rerun the stopped MySQL fixture
Public/WebShell actual HTTP + authoritative JDBC Fresh final-commit run: 135 assertions pass, using fixture Hook execution/stop records
Actual TS authority/Harness + Java Store HTTP Fresh final-commit run: both scenarios pass — same-authority ACL restoration and original protocol-zero attachment close

Before / after: the exact main baseline returned 409 session_state_conflict for ACTIVE files deletion on both surfaces and admitted no DELETE operation. Final HTTP tests return 202, verify operation replay/actor isolation/busy Turn rejection, persist effects before permanent draining, and atomically complete retirement/tombstone/terminal event. RELEASED without original stop proof cannot complete. Committed Hook fixture outcomes survive a lost receipt response and a newer coordinator claim; an injected failure after retirement rolls back the entire tombstone transaction before one successful retry. Direct JDBC ACL revocation between committed End and undispatched Delete blocks dispatch until restoration. Both capability projections are checked; CLOSED L2 deletion remains Hook-free without Harness support.

Live recovery bridge: A definite dispatch-commit ACL refusal returns 409 workspace_lifecycle_authorization_revoked, preserves journal revision 6 and writesStopped=false; restoring access lets the same live authority and same command commit once to revision 7. The original protocol-zero attachment closes through Harness DELETE with HTTP 204, seals its original writer, advances revision 2→3 and still rejects ordinary prompt with 409; controlled Store completion yields CLOSED.

The required CLI attempt was made against the final bundle and returned exit 1 (Unknown arguments: delete, l3-active-baseline). There is no Hosted lifecycle CLI command, so the API tests are an explicit HTTP/test-script fallback, not a passing CLI deletion test.

Physical limits: HTTP Hook counts and worker-stop evidence use fixtures, and takeover uses two coordinator owners in one JVM. The legacy attachment bridge has no Hook catalog, and neither bridge scenario uses a real original worker binding. Actual Linux Harness/worker Hook commands, mount revocation, host/boot/PID stop identity, retained shared file/history/Artifact bytes and neighboring physical holders, and independent-server crashes at every physical boundary remain unverified. No result here treats H2, macOS or fixture metadata as physical Linux acceptance. Unknown outcomes remain indefinitely recovery-blocked; no force-delete path was added.

Pre-run commit/source/artifact SHA-256 provenance is preserved locally with the full logs and executable test reports. No shared build, Maven cache mutation or old MySQL process was performed by the independent test engineer; owned temporary probe resources were cleaned up. This report covers L3 only and does not close the L4 work in #13164.

中文验证报告

提交为 d1982fa1e1d5d65153584c4966c5cba59ee4f9d8,基于 main 2c591ecc08a6fa080342f9b1b9f7f43215178cbb。本地在 macOS 上使用 Node 22、Java 21、隔离 Maven 依赖、H2 夹具和临时 MySQL 8.4 验证。

检查 结果与准确范围
最终提交 工作区干净,rebase 未改变 L3 补丁;此前两轮完整干净自审,加独立主干整合复查 No findings
最终提交 build、typecheck、bundle 推送前各运行一次,均通过
定向 TS 测试 Core 94 + CLI 312 = 406 项通过;CLI 包含 main 新增的 Shell 回执与清理回归
定向 Java 测试 SDK 21 + Broker 170 + Server 79 = 270 项通过;SDK/Server Checkstyle 和适用 SpotBugs 通过。初始 Broker verify 未执行显式 Checkstyle,见下方纠正
MySQL 并发与回滚 此前 30 项通过,0 跳过;SDK/Broker/Server 全部源码及测试 Git tree 与被测实现一致,本轮未恢复或重跑已停止的 MySQL
实际 public/WebShell HTTP 与权威 JDBC 最终提交新运行 135 个断言通过,Hook 执行及停机证明使用夹具
实际 TS authority/Harness 与 Java Store HTTP 新运行两组场景通过:同一 authority 的 ACL 恢复,以及 protocol-zero 原 attachment 关闭

**变更前后:**精确 main baseline 的两个入口对 ACTIVE files 删除均返回 409 session_state_conflict,不接纳 DELETE operation。最终 HTTP 验证返回 202,覆盖操作重放、actor 隔离与忙碌 Turn 拒绝,先保存 effects 再永久排空,原子完成退役、墓碑与终止事件。RELEASED 缺少原停机证明不能完成。已提交的 Hook 夹具结果可在 receipt 应答丢失后由新 coordinator claim 恢复;在退役后注入失败会回滚整个墓碑事务,之后一次重试完成。真实 JDBC 在已提交 End 与未派发 Delete 之间撤销 ACL 会阻止派发,恢复后继续。两个入口的 capability 都经过核验;CLOSED 的 L2 删除不依赖 Harness 支持且不运行 Hook。

**存活恢复桥接:**明确的 ACL 派发提交拒绝返回 409 workspace_lifecycle_authorization_revoked,journal revision 保持 6,writesStopped=false;恢复权限后,同一存活 authority 的相同命令提交一次,revision 6→7。原 protocol-zero attachment 的 Harness DELETE 返回 204,原 writer 被 seal,journal revision 2→3,普通 prompt 仍返回 409,受控 Store 完成后为 CLOSED。

对最终 bundle 执行过要求的 CLI 尝试,exit 1(Unknown arguments: delete, l3-active-baseline)。Hosted 生命周期没有对应 CLI 命令,因此 API 验证明确采用 HTTP/test-script fallback,不能算作 CLI 删除通过。

实体验证限制:HTTP Hook 次数和 worker 停机证据使用夹具,接管为同一 JVM 内的两个 coordinator owner;旧协议 attachment 桥接没有 Hook catalog,两个桥接场景均没有真实原 worker binding。真实 Linux Harness/worker Hook 命令、挂载撤销、host/boot/PID 停机身份、保留的物理共享文件/历史/Artifact 与邻居 holder,以及每个物理边界上的独立服务崩溃仍未验证。H2、macOS 或夹具元数据结果均不算 Linux 实体验收。unknown 可无限期 recovery-blocked,没有增加强制删除。

运行前提交、源码、构建产物的 SHA-256 证明与完整日志、可执行测试报告均保存在本地。独立测试工程师未执行共享构建、修改 Maven 缓存或操作旧 MySQL;本轮拥有的临时探测资源已清理。报告仅覆盖 L3,不关闭 #13164 中的 L4 工作。

CI follow-up correction and exact fix-commit validation

CI on the initial submitted commit exposed six Broker indentation violations, 19 old close/retention fixture contract failures (repeated in two Java jobs), and five packaged Harness cases whose fake Store lacked execution:authorize. Fixed in cb912b6f00895500cfd8e99507c6922482f42123; production lifecycle behavior is unchanged. On that exact committed tree, build/typecheck/bundle pass, Broker HTTP tests pass 25/25, full Server verification has 559 tests with zero failures/errors and one existing Linux-only macOS skip, packaged no-tool Harness passes 9/9 with retry disabled, and explicit Broker/Server Checkstyle plus SpotBugs pass. MySQL and the physical lifecycle acceptance were not rerun in this correction. Independent reproduction and review plus two clean incremental audit passes are recorded. Fresh CI on the new SHA is followed hourly.

The original CLI unit console log was overwritten by the required CLI command probe; its successful gate exit and preserved JUnit report still record 312 tests with zero failures/errors. It was not rerun to hide the lost console log. API fallback, Hook fixtures and the physical validation limits above remain unchanged.

CI 后续纠正与修复提交验证

初始提交的 CI 发现 Broker 6 处缩进违规、旧 close/retention 夹具 19 项契约失败(两个 Java job 重复)以及模拟 Store 缺少 execution:authorize 导致的 5 项打包 Harness 失败。已在 cb912b6f00895500cfd8e99507c6922482f42123 修复,生产生命周期逻辑未改变。在该精确提交上 build/typecheck/bundle 通过;Broker HTTP 25/25;全量 Server 559 项零失败/错误,1 项既有 Linux 专用测试在 macOS 跳过;禁用重试的打包 no-tool Harness 9/9;显式 Broker/Server Checkstyle 与 SpotBugs 通过。本次纠正未重跑 MySQL 或生命周期实体验收。独立复现与评审及两轮增量干净自审均已记录;新 SHA 的 CI 每小时跟进。

原 CLI 单测控制台日志被要求执行的 CLI 命令探测覆盖,但成功门禁退出码与保留的 JUnit 报告仍记录 312 项零失败/错误,未为隐藏日志丢失而重跑。此前 API fallback、Hook 夹具及实体验证限制保持不变。

Second CI follow-up: recovered detach and full fixture contracts

Commit 55004ac192d5f68dab6ee4600a5cba3126c99849 fixes a real Linux close regression: Java may verify effects and enter DRAINING without sending a Harness lifecycle request, leaving its live attachment without local lifecycle memory. Valid detach now uses persistent operation/current claim/original writer/scope authorization regardless of that memory; failed claims retain the attachment and restore prior authority. Bare detach remains ordinarily authorized and no lifecycle Hook is dispatched. Three new regressions fail before the fix and pass afterward. Also synchronized ordinary tool-turn Broker mock authorization and the generated OpenAPI descriptions.

The clean final commit passes build/typecheck/bundle, CLI 334, generated API 2, packaged Harness 9 (retry=0), Server 559 (zero failures/errors, one existing Linux-only macOS skip), explicit Server Checkstyle and SpotBugs, and one real MySQL 8.4.11 mid-commit race method. An independent frozen original test reproduces a placement lock wait; the actual patched method keeps concurrent deletion admission during the private commit, claims afterward, and retains all writer/retirement/record/no-announcement assertions. The new privately owned MySQL was identity-checked, stopped and cleaned; no old instance was restarted. Two clean incremental audits and independent review: No findings.

This one MySQL method is not a rerun of the full MariaDB suite or the historical 30 MySQL tests. The Linux CI close cases failed at the previous head; their repaired physical execution still awaits new-head CI. Local authority mocks, H2 fixtures and macOS results do not establish real Hook commands, mount/shared-byte/neighbor-holder or distinct-process crash acceptance. Original CLI-log loss and physical limits above remain explicit. Exact new evidence uses separate gate logs and saved JUnit reports.

第二轮 CI 后续:恢复后的 detach 与夹具契约

提交 55004ac192d5f68dab6ee4600a5cba3126c99849 修复真实 Linux close 回归:Java 可直接核验 effects 并进入 DRAINING,不请求 Harness lifecycle,因此存活 attachment 没有本地 lifecycle 状态。现在合法 detach 无论本地记忆是否存在,都须核验持久 operation、当前 claim、原 writer/scope;拒绝时保留 attachment 并恢复原权限。裸 detach 仍按普通执行授权,不派发生命周期 Hook。新增三项回归修复前失败、修复后通过;同时同步工具回合 Broker 授权模拟及 OpenAPI 生成描述。

干净的精确提交通过 build/typecheck/bundle、CLI 334、生成 API 2、打包 Harness 9(retry=0)、Server 559(零失败/错误,macOS 跳过既有 Linux 专用 1 项)、显式 Server Checkstyle/SpotBugs 及真实 MySQL 8.4.11 提交中竞态原方法 1 项。独立冻结原测试复现 placement 锁等待;实际修复方法保留私有提交期间并发删除准入,随后 claim,保留 writer/退役/记录/无公告的全部断言。新建私有 MySQL 已核验身份后关闭并清理,没有恢复旧实例。两轮连续干净增量自审与独立评审 No findings。

单个 MySQL 方法不等于重跑 MariaDB 全套或历史 30 项。前一 head 的 Linux close 场景实际失败,修复后的实体执行仍待新 head CI;本地权限模拟、H2、macOS 不证明真实 Hook、挂载/共享文件/邻居 holder 或独立服务崩溃验收。此前 CLI 日志丢失及实体验证限制继续明确记录;本轮使用独立门禁日志与保存的 JUnit。

Review follow-up: error semantics and cross-tenant fence locks

Commit 91bdf65e87322dc1fc24a907d6495f9b531caaef distinguishes ordinary Store failures from a definite lifecycle fence. Six prompt/detach HTTP regressions fail before the fix with misleading 409 and pass afterward with 503, no model/Hook dispatch and attachment retained for a later authorized detach; a genuine typed lifecycle rejection remains 409. These route-level tests use a mocked Store error, not a live Store network outage.

An independently owned real MySQL 8.4.11 reproduction found a second defect: L3's raw-ID drain locking query has no index and cross-tenant callers wait on scanned drain rows. The fix shares the Broker's original length-prefixed hash encoding and uses the existing drain primary key, preserving original identity predicates, claims, writer checks and placement/retention locking. Actual patched Store witness uses const/PRIMARY, permits another tenant to finish before held-transaction release, and keeps a distinct same-tenant Session waiting on placement. Twelve actual writer/fence/protocol-zero controls pass. The actual new MySQL concurrency regression method runs once on the final committed SDK/Broker/Server classes and passes, alongside the final actual Store controls/witness; this is one method, not a full integration-suite rerun.

build/typecheck/bundle pass; CLI 197/197; packaged Harness 9/9 with retries disabled; Broker drain/HTTP 51/51; full Server 559 with zero failures/errors and one existing Linux-only macOS skip; explicit Broker/Server Checkstyle and SpotBugs pass. Two consecutive clean incremental audits and independent cross-package review pass at diff SHA-256 7d2f62f69e093679202e6911fbb9a54e453a3ea0b8c604edba0ed7e00d050537; the committed diff is identical. No flaky reruns.

Bounded Store benchmark: actual transactional methods, fresh owned MySQL with REPEATABLE READ and durable flush/binlog, eight fixed connections, concurrency 1/4/8, three rounds, ten warmups then thirty samples per worker; old head and patched implementation each contribute 54 runs / 7,020 samples. At concurrency eight, patched same-tenant vs different-tenant throughput/p95 is authorizeOrdinary 1,175/7.538ms vs 3,268/2.894ms, renewWriter 1,148/7.229ms vs 3,049/2.944ms, commit 884/9.883ms vs 2,465/4.270ms. This compares 55004ac19 with the key fix, not main with L3. Small synthetic journals and two drain rows do not measure Harness HTTP, long-history scans, production load, or establish universal acceptable tenant-serialization cost. The owned database is identity-checked, shut down via its own socket, confirmed exited and removed (metadata stopped); no historical fixture was restarted.

New remote evidence at the previous head 55004ac19: Linux hosted/MySQL succeeds with 18 Hosted ITs and 40 O4 MySQL gates; MariaDB succeeds with 61 ITs. The two real-worker public/WebShell close scenarios now pass original PID death, drain/registration/binding proofs, idempotent replay and retained physical bytes. They use different Workspaces and have no real lifecycle Hook commands. This completes the formerly failing Linux close subset; it does not complete ACTIVE delete Hook/mount/host-boot identity/same-Workspace shared-neighbor-holder or every distinct-process crash boundary. New-head CI results must be checked separately. Historical initial console-log loss and unknown-indefinite-blocking limitations remain as recorded above.

评审后续:错误语义与围栏跨租户锁

提交 91bdf65e87322dc1fc24a907d6495f9b531caaef 区分普通 Store 故障与明确生命周期围栏。六项 prompt/detach HTTP 回归在修复前误报 409,修复后返回 503、不派发模型或 Hook,并保留 attachment 供后续合法 detach;真正的 typed 生命周期拒绝仍返回 409。这里是模拟 Store 错误的路由测试,不能算真实网络故障注入。

独立新建的真实 MySQL 8.4.11 复现第二个问题:L3 按原 ID 锁定围栏但没有对应索引,导致跨租户等待扫描到的围栏记录。修复共用 Broker 原 length-prefix 哈希编码,使用已有主键,同时保留原身份、claim、writer 与 placement/retention 锁顺序。实际修后 Store 查询使用 const/PRIMARY,其他租户在持锁事务释放前完成,同租户独立会话仍等待 placement,12 项真实 writer/围栏/旧协议控制通过。新增实际 MySQL 方法与最终提交门禁结果见英文段落;两轮干净增量自审及独立跨包评审通过,提交 diff 与被审 diff 一致,没有 flaky 重跑。

上述有限基准使用真实事务方法、固定 8 连接、1/4/8 并发,修前/修后各 54 轮运行、7,020 样本。它只比较旧 head 与主键修复,不代表 main/L3 整体回归测量;短 journal 和两条围栏不覆盖 Harness HTTP、长历史准入与生产负载,也不证明所有部署能接受租户内串行成本。本轮 owned 数据库按身份清理,未恢复历史实例。

新增远端证据是旧 head 55004ac19 的 Linux Hosted 18 项、O4 MySQL 40 项及 MariaDB 61 项通过。其中两个真实 worker close 场景验证了原 PID 停止、drain/registration/binding 证明、幂等重放与物理文件保留;场景使用不同 Workspace,没有真实生命周期 Hook 命令。这完成此前失败的 Linux close 子集,仍不等于 ACTIVE delete Hook、挂载、host/boot 身份、同 Workspace 共享/邻居 holder 及全部独立进程崩溃验收。新 head 的 CI 须另行核验;最初 console 日志丢失与 unknown 可无限期阻塞限制继续保留。

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[EN]
CI fix pushed in cb912b6f00895500cfd8e99507c6922482f42123.

Action Confirmed cause and correction
Fixed Broker lambda indentation caused six Checkstyle violations; corrected whitespace and explicitly ran checkstyle:check.
Fixed Old close/retention fixtures had no L3 protocol support or authoritative Runtime binding repository. They now exercise protocol 1 with the real JDBC never-initialized and stop-proof checks, without inventing Hook evidence. Updated once-only cleanup and exact fence-code assertions; retained event counts, actor isolation and takeover generation checks.
Fixed Packaged Harness's fake HTTP Store did not implement the new ordinary execution authorization request. Added strict method, attached writer, token, workspace, writer ID and generation checks.

Validation on this exact committed tree before push: build, typecheck, bundle; Broker HTTP tests 25/25; Server 559 tests, zero failures/errors, one existing Linux-only test skipped on macOS; packaged no-tool Harness 9/9 with retries disabled. Broker/Server Checkstyle and SpotBugs pass. Independent frozen reproduction was red before fixture correction and green after it. Two clean incremental self-audits and independent review: No findings.

The initial Broker verify did not execute Checkstyle; the earlier broad static-check claim has been corrected in the E2E report. Both failing Java CI jobs shared the same 19 fixture failures. No flaky reruns were used. There were no reviewer threads to address: replied/resolved 0/0; unresolved 0. New-head CI remains authoritative and is being followed hourly. Real Linux lifecycle/worker/shared-file physical acceptance remains pending.


[中文]
CI 修复已推送至 cb912b6f00895500cfd8e99507c6922482f42123。

行动 核实原因与修复
已修复 Broker lambda 缩进触发 6 处 Checkstyle 违规;修正空白并显式执行 checkstyle:check。
已修复 旧 close/retention 夹具没有 L3 协议支持及权威 Runtime binding 仓库。现在通过真实 JDBC 核验 never-initialized 和停机证据,不伪造 Hook 回执;更新一次停机及精确围栏错误码断言,保留事件次数、actor 隔离和接管 generation 断言。
已修复 打包 Harness 的模拟 HTTP Store 没有实现新增普通执行授权请求;补齐方法、attachment writer、token、workspace、writer ID 与 generation 校验。

在推送前对该精确提交验证:build、typecheck、bundle;Broker HTTP 25/25;Server 559 项,零失败/错误,其中 1 项既有 Linux 专用测试在 macOS 跳过;打包 no-tool Harness 禁用重试后 9/9。Broker/Server Checkstyle 与 SpotBugs 通过。独立冻结复现先失败、夹具修正后通过;增量两轮干净自审及独立评审 No findings。

初始 Broker verify 没有执行 Checkstyle,E2E 报告已纠正此前笼统的静态检查表述。两个 Java CI 失败 job 都来自相同 19 项夹具失败;未进行 flaky 重跑。没有待处理评审线程,回复/解决 0/0,未解决 0。新提交 CI 仍需跟进,已配置每小时维护。真实 Linux 生命周期、worker 和共享文件实体验证仍待完成。

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[EN]
CI recovery fixes pushed in 55004ac192d5f68dab6ee4600a5cba3126c99849.

Action Confirmed cause and correction
Fixed The actual Linux close job received HTTP 409 on detach after the coordinator recovered effects without sending a Harness lifecycle request. Detach now authorizes against the persisted operation, current claim, original writer and DRAINING state even without local lifecycle memory. Failed authorization restores the previous authority and retains the attachment; ordinary detach remains fenced. Detach dispatches no Hooks.
Fixed The MariaDB mid-commit deletion test joined a child claim while its outer transaction held the tenant placement lock. Kept concurrent deletion admission during the commit, moved claiming afterward, and retained writer-gated retirement, private record retention and absence of task announcements. Independently reproduced the original lock error on new isolated MySQL 8.4.11 and verified the actual patched test.
Fixed The tool-turn fixture's Broker mock omitted the new lifecycle authorization method; added its faithful no-op behavior for ordinary execution.
Fixed Regenerated the managed API descriptions from the already updated OpenAPI contract. Synchronized both design languages for receipt-recovered detach.

Validation ran once for the clean final committed tree before push: build/typecheck/bundle; CLI 334/334; generated API 2/2; packaged Harness 9/9 with retries disabled; Server 559 tests with zero failures/errors and one existing Linux-only skip on macOS; explicit Server Checkstyle/SpotBugs; one independently executed actual MySQL race method. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package review: No findings. No production SQL lock order or reliable-stop evidence was weakened.

No reviewer feedback was pending: replied/resolved 0/0; unresolved 0. No suggestions rejected or deferred, and no flaky reruns. Fresh Linux worker/stop/shared-file and MariaDB suite results remain subject to new-head CI; local simulated Harness authority tests and one actual MySQL race case do not establish physical deployment acceptance. The remote PR is now Ready for review; this maintenance round made no Ready/Draft change. Hourly monitoring continues.


[中文]
CI 恢复修复已推送至 55004ac192d5f68dab6ee4600a5cba3126c99849。

行动 核实原因与修复
已修复 实体 Linux close 在 coordinator 直接恢复 effects、未请求 Harness lifecycle 时,detach 返回 409。现在没有本地 lifecycle 状态也须根据持久 operation、当前 claim、原 writer 与 DRAINING 授权;拒绝后恢复原权限并保留 attachment,普通 detach 仍受围栏限制。detach 不派发 Hook。
已修复 MariaDB 提交中删除测试在外层事务持有 tenant placement 锁时等待子线程 claim。保留提交期间的并发删除准入,将 claim 移到提交后;保留 writer 阻止退役、私有记录保留及无 task 公告断言。新建隔离 MySQL 8.4.11 独立复现原锁错误并验证实际修复测试。
已修复 工具回合测试的模拟 Broker 缺少新增生命周期授权方法,补齐普通执行时的真实 no-op 行为。
已修复 根据已更新的 OpenAPI 重新生成 managed API 描述,同步中英文设计的 receipt 恢复后 detach 规则。

对干净的实际最终提交运行一次推送前门禁:build/typecheck/bundle;CLI 334/334;生成 API 2/2;打包 Harness 禁用重试后 9/9;Server 559 项零失败/错误,macOS 跳过既有 Linux 专用 1 项;显式 Server Checkstyle/SpotBugs;独立执行的真实 MySQL 竞态原方法 1 项。两轮连续干净增量自审及独立跨包评审 No findings,没有弱化生产 SQL 锁顺序或可靠停机证据。

没有待处理评审反馈:回复/解决 0/0,未解决 0;没有拒绝或延期建议,未重跑 flaky。实体 Linux worker/停机/共享文件及 MariaDB 全套结果仍需新提交 CI;本地模拟 Harness 权限测试与单个真实 MySQL 竞态测试不等于实体部署验收。远端现为 Ready for review,本轮维护没有执行 Ready/Draft 切换;继续每小时跟进。

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] Agreed on the error distinction and the need for explicit architecture and contention evidence. Fixed in 91bdf65e87322dc1fc24a907d6495f9b531caaef. This consolidates responses to Stage 1, Stage 2 (including its latest edit), and Stage 3.

Item Judgment and action
Ordinary authorization errors Fixed. Only a typed Store 409 managed_session_lifecycle_active maps to the Harness lifecycle 409. Transport errors, Store 5xx and writer conflicts return 503 hosted_execution_authorization_unavailable, admit no work, and retain a failed detach attachment. Six prompt/detach regressions fail before and pass afterward.
Why not close then L2 delete? Documented in both languages. Reliable close settles End and permanently stops the original Runtime; L2 deletion of CLOSED/ARCHIVED Sessions deliberately runs no Hooks. That composition cannot settle Delete after End and before original-worker stop. Starting a replacement to do so violates the no-replay requirement. L3 reuses the stop and retirement machinery while keeping one DELETING operation and durable effects evidence. An intermediate CLOSED can truthfully describe a successful separate close; the issue is the required one-operation delete/Hook semantics, not calling that state inherently false.
Tenant contention Partially agree. The placement guard and ordinary authorization request are incremental costs. However, exact main 2c591ecc already reaches the publication tenant lock through requireHeadForUpdate → findHeadForUpdate → lockSession → lockTenant in commit and renewWriter. Both locks are not newly introduced there. Real MySQL investigation also found an actual L3 defect: raw-ID drain FOR UPDATE queries had no matching index and locked unrelated tenants' fence records. Fixed those queries, claim JOINs and drain updates to use the existing hashed primary key, preserving raw identity checks and the original placement/retention lock hierarchy. No migration or guard narrowing.
Admission journal scan / compaction Agree about O(history) lock duration; documented without a bounded latency claim. Production currently initializes the compaction watermark to zero and has no path that advances it. Nonzero remains unsupported and fail-closed; existing cold recovery also rejects it, with its own error code. Future compaction needs durable idle evidence; this PR does not implement it.
Wider ordinary/claim fencing Retained. A persisted operation can be admitted while an attachment has no local lifecycle memory. Writer mutations and ordinary execution must serialize with persistent admission; allowing only locally known L3 Sessions through a different lock path would reopen that race. Protocol-zero retains its scoped close exception. The cross-tenant scan defect is fixed independently from any future tenant-guard redesign.
Inline Java names / separate close PR Deferred. A naming sweep adds review churn; splitting the close switch out would separate it from the protocol, effects and fencing required by the accepted L3 sequence. No unrelated cleanup or L4 scope added.
Maintainer routing Added existing scope/core and daemon labels. This remains a feature requiring maintainer architecture review, not an automatically approved large refactor. No Ready/Draft or merge action was taken.

Measured Store cost: new privately owned MySQL 8.4.11, REPEATABLE READ, durable flush/binlog settings, eight fixed connections, actual Store methods wrapped in transactions, concurrency 1/4/8, three rounds with ten warmups then thirty measured samples per worker. Each implementation has 54 runs and 7,020 measured operations; the comparison is 55004ac19 versus this primary-key fix, not L3 versus main. At concurrency eight on the patched implementation:

Actual Store method Same-tenant ops/s Same-tenant p95 Different-tenant ops/s Different-tenant p95
authorizeOrdinary 1,175 7.538 ms 3,268 2.894 ms
renewWriter 1,148 7.229 ms 3,049 2.944 ms
commit 884 9.883 ms 2,465 4.270 ms

With a transaction deliberately held, the original query had EXPLAIN ALL/key=null and another tenant waited on harness_drain.PRIMARY; the patched query uses const/PRIMARY, that tenant completes before release, and a distinct same-tenant Session still waits on placement. Twelve real writer/fence/protocol-zero controls pass. These are bounded local synthetic Store measurements, with two fence rows and short journals: they do not include Harness HTTP latency, long-history admission scans, production load, or establish that the tenant serialization cost is acceptable for every deployment.

Exact final-commit checks: build/typecheck/bundle pass; CLI 197/197; packaged Harness 9/9 with retries disabled; Broker drain/HTTP 51/51; full Server 559 with zero failures/errors and one existing Linux-only macOS skip; explicit Broker/Server Checkstyle and SpotBugs pass.. Two consecutive clean incremental audits and independent cross-package review report no findings. The actual new MySQL concurrency regression method runs once on the final committed SDK/Broker/Server classes and passes, alongside the final actual Store controls/witness; this is one method, not a full integration-suite rerun.. No flaky CI reruns were used.

At the previous head 55004ac19, the actual remote Node/Lint/daemon/Java/MariaDB and Linux hosted/MySQL jobs passed. In particular, two actual-worker close cases now verify original PID stop/drain evidence and retained physical files. They use separate Workspaces and no real lifecycle Hook commands; full physical L3 Hook/mount/host-boot-identity/shared-neighbor/crash acceptance remains pending. New-head CI is followed hourly, rather than inferred from old CI or local green results. There are no inline review threads (resolved 0/0; remaining 0). Maintainer architecture review and deployment-level workload/physical acceptance remain explicit.


[codex] 已在 91bdf65e87322dc1fc24a907d6495f9b531caaef 修复并集中回复上述三个阶段的评审。

事项 判断与处理
普通授权错误 已修复。仅明确的 Store 生命周期围栏 409 映射为 Harness 生命周期 409;传输、Store 5xx、writer 冲突返回 503,拒绝执行并保留失败 detach 的 attachment。六项回归修复前失败、修复后通过。
close 后 L2 delete 的替代方案 双语文档已解释:close 结算 End 后永久停止原 Runtime,L2 不运行 Hook,因此不能在原 worker 停机前结算 Delete;替代 worker 补跑违反禁止重放。L3 复用停机与退役机制,在同一个 DELETING operation 内保存 effects。独立 close 成功后的 CLOSED 可以是真实状态,但不满足本次单 operation 删除及 Hook 语义。
租户锁开销 部分同意。新增 placement guard 与授权请求确有成本;但 main 的 commit/renewWriter 已经由 Session helper 获取 publication 租户锁,不能说两个锁均是新引入。实际 MySQL 调查还复现 L3 围栏查询全扫描导致的跨租户锁阻塞,现已用 Broker 原哈希主键修复读取、claim JOIN 与变更,保留原身份校验和锁顺序,不新增迁移。
完整 journal 扫描与 compaction 已明确 O(history) 成本及无固定延迟保证。产品目前没有推进非零 watermark 的路径;非零仍按失败关闭处理,既有冷恢复也不支持但使用自己的错误码。未来压缩需要持久 idle 证明,本次不扩大范围实现。
普通路径与 claim 围栏范围 保留。持久生命周期可在 attachment 没有本地记忆时被接纳,仅按本地 L3 状态选锁会重新引入竞态。protocol-zero 限定 close 例外继续保留;跨租户扫描锁已单独修复,不据此缩减租户准入保护。
Java 命名整理与拆分 close PR 明确延期:前者增加无关审查改动,后者会拆开已确认 L3 方案所需的协议、effects 与围栏。不扩到 L4。
维护者路由 已补 scope/core 与 daemon 标签,保留维护者架构评审要求,未自行切换 Ready/Draft 或合并。

上表为本地真实 MySQL、实际 Store 事务方法的有限测量:修前/修后各 54 轮运行、7,020 个样本,1/4/8 并发、固定 8 连接。仅比较 55004ac19 与主键修复,不推断 L3 相对 main 的整体退化;不包括 Harness HTTP、长历史准入或生产负载,不能据此宣称所有部署可接受租户内串行成本。持锁复现中,修前其他租户等待围栏 PRIMARY;修后使用主键且可继续,同租户独立会话仍等待 placement,12 项 writer/围栏/旧协议控制通过。

精确最终提交验证见英文结果;两轮连续干净自审与独立跨包评审无新发现。本轮未做 flaky 重跑。旧 head 的真实 Linux close/PID/文件保留子集已在 CI 通过,完整 L3 Hook、挂载、host/boot 身份、同 Workspace 邻居 holder 与独立服务崩溃验收仍待完成。新 head 的 CI 每小时跟进;评审线程 0/0,剩余 0。维护者架构评审与部署负载/实体验收继续保留。

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration.

中文

请勿对活跃的 PR 执行 rebase 或 force-push,因为这会使已有的评审评论失效。另外,供日后参考:作为集成流程的一部分,机器人始终会自动将所有改动压缩(squash)为单个提交。

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Synchronized with main 35616f3b643f6d87cc00112d961a0fbb448aca00 and pushed final head 5f6430417d4a3b377c498107cd2a119e2ab54f49 using a lease against the previous remote head. This resolves the merge conflict introduced by main's seven new commits, including persisted tool profiles and takeover recovery.

Item Action
Historical upgrade fixture conflict Retained main's direct historical-schema seed and completed close receipt, plus L3's protocol-zero assertion and L2 retirement coverage.
Duplicate V35 migration Preserved main's V35 tool-profile migration and V32. Renamed the unmerged L3 lifecycle migration to V36 with byte-identical SQL and unchanged historical protocol-zero/DRAINING defaults.
Prior L3 repairs Rebased all four commits; the three subsequent repair patches compare equal in range-diff. No L4 scope added.
Documentation Updated both design languages and the PR's migration notes.

Validation on this exact clean final commit: build, typecheck, bundle and the documented migration uniqueness guard passed; CLI 243 tests and packaged Harness 9 tests passed with retries disabled; SDK Hosted client 27 tests, Broker drain/HTTP 51 tests, Server 575 tests (zero failures/errors, one existing Linux-only test skipped on macOS), explicit Checkstyle and Broker/Server SpotBugs passed. Two clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package review found no confirmed defects. The guard's initial argument-less invocation exited with usage status 2; its corrected documented command passed, and no completed build/test stage was repeated.

The test engineer independently ran six actual final-artifact fixture invocations: five on a new owned MySQL 8.4.11 instance and one on H2. They cover V31/V34 upgrades, preserved close evidence and tool profiles, BLOCKED CLOSED/ARCHIVED deletion recovery, L3 atomic rollback/effects reuse and same/cross-tenant fences. The source/compiled migration inventory is 34 SQL + 2 Java = 36 unique versions, without a stale V35 lifecycle resource. The owned MySQL was identity-checked, shut down and removed. These selected cases do not represent a fresh full MySQL/MariaDB suite; CLI help only proves bundle startup.

No new review feedback required a reply; no inline threads exist (resolved 0/0, remaining 0). No CI rerun was requested. New-head remote CI is tracked separately from these local results. Full real Linux Hook commands, mount/host/boot/PID checks, shared Workspace files/neighbor holders and every distinct-process crash boundary remain pending; existing evidence is not promoted to complete physical L3 acceptance.


已同步 main 35616f3b6,使用旧远端 head 的 lease 推送最终提交 5f6430417,解决 main 新增七个提交带来的合并冲突。历史升级夹具保留 main 的旧 schema 直接建行、原 close receipt、持久 files profile 与 L2 退役断言,同时保留 L3 protocol-zero 断言。main 的 V35 工具配置迁移及 V32 原样保留,未合入的 L3 生命周期迁移顺延 V36,SQL 逐字节不变;双语设计与 PR 迁移说明已同步。此前三个修复补丁在 range-diff 中完全一致,不增加 L4。

该精确干净提交的 build/typecheck/bundle、迁移唯一性检查、CLI243、打包Harness9(禁用重试)、SDK27、Broker51、Server575及静态检查全部通过;Server零失败/错误,macOS仅跳过既有Linux专用1项。两轮增量干净自审和独立跨包评审无确认缺陷。迁移检查首次因缺少模块参数返回usage状态2;补全为仓库CI命令后通过,没有重复已完成的构建/测试阶段。

测试工程师对最终编译产物独立运行6次原夹具调用(5 MySQL、1 H2),验证旧schema升级、close证据及profile保留、CLOSED/ARCHIVED阻塞删除恢复、L3原子回滚/effects复用及租户围栏。源码/产物含34 SQL+2 Java共36个唯一迁移,已排除旧V35生命周期资源残留;新建owned MySQL已核验身份后关闭并清理。这不是完整MySQL/MariaDB suite重跑,CLI help只验证bundle启动。

本轮无新增评审需回复,线程0/0、剩余0,无CI重跑。远端新head CI单独跟进。完整Linux实体Hook、挂载/host/boot/PID、共享Workspace文件/邻居holder及全部独立进程崩溃边界仍未完成验收。

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] Agreed on the independently reproduced correctness issues; fixed in 075d36d. Follow-up to the review timeout: run 37181708516 exhausted its 21600-second budget without submitting a completed review or inline threads. Its unpublished partial tool output was treated as claims, independently checked against the actual 5f64304 head. Commit 075d36d contains the verified correctness fixes and is rebased onto main 98b0255.

Partial claim / observed issue Action and evidence
R1-6: Store failure prevents local cancellation Fixed. Independent HTTP reproduction showed network, 503 and writer-conflict errors blocked AbortSignal and left the admitted Turn active. Cancellation now remains authenticated and aborts the admitted Turn without ordinary Store authorization; the local lifecycle fence still rejects cancellation during lifecycle work.
R1-3: a successor with saved effects skips detach when its attachment cache is empty Fixed with current-claim, original-ID detach, instead of a recovery load. The baseline made zero detach requests and allowed three original writer renewals before completion blocked. A successor now contacts the original Session ID without create/load/Hook replay. Store retains scope/token/writer/generation, current claim and DRAINING checks; missing authority or a supplied wrong client ID cannot bypass authentication.
Expired / already SEALED original writer blocks cleanup Fixed. Cleanup accepts only the same original identity under the persisted current claim/effects/DRAINING fence, without renewal or journal append. It stops activation renewal and idempotently seals that writer. Ordinary/legacy close still records activation release; new Hook dispatch, journal commits and writer renewal retain their active, unexpired-writer requirements. Historical active activation is not normal-release proof; final completion still requires the original Runtime stop evidence.
R1-1: malformed journal records cause lifecycle scanner NPE Fixed. Five invalid shapes across ordinary, lifecycle-authority and fenced-settlement commits return the existing 400 invalid_managed_session_store_request, with journal revision/transactions/candidate resources rolled back. The independent baseline observed ten lifecycle-path NPEs; no real deployed HTTP500 claim is made.
R1-2 / R1-4 / R1-5: replacement Runtime, cached-authority reuse, scheduler deadlock Not adopted as PR-specific critical fixes: exact-code independent tracing did not establish those scenarios. Recovery uses the original binding/generation and Hook control substitutes per-request authority. Current main's separate renewal pool and guarded release were preserved; this does not claim all scheduler/contention concerns are solved.
R1-7: generalize Shell/MCP lifecycle loads Deferred with L4. Production L3 remains files-profile-only; no Shell/MCP lifecycle support was added.
R1-15, R1-19, R1-21/22/23/25 and broader coverage, naming, optimization or documentation suggestions Deferred under the approximately-five-review-round Critical-only rule in AGENTS.md. Confirmed defects receive focused tests; broad catalog/protocol-zero/controller/capability coverage, indexed effects lookup and additional OpenAPI descriptions are not represented as fixed. Existing Java tests do construct lifecycle authority and exercise claim/fence checks, so the absolute contrary claim is inaccurate; missing broader coverage remains a suggestion. Maintainer architecture/tenant-contention review is still relevant.
main conflicts and migration collision Resolved. Both public capability projections reuse main's batched retention result and preserve its approval/maySubmit path. Store retains L3 pre-dispatch ACL/fenced settlement before main's ApplyResult/activation-cache commit. Main Broker hardening is preserved. Main V32 and V35–V39 are byte-identical; unmerged L3 SQL moved V36→V40 without content changes, with synchronized English/Chinese design and PR notes.

An unpushed intermediate f41fa788 passed its local gates but failed independent actual packaged Harness→Java Store/H2 verification for expired/SEALED detach: after successful authorization it still attempted activation-release journal commits and returned 503. That result reset the audit and verification; the final change explicitly prevents the append rather than ignoring its failure or relaxing commit authority. Intermediate gate passes are not claimed as a delivered fix.

Validation on this exact clean commit: the unique final gate passed build/typecheck/bundle and Flyway uniqueness (40 migrations); Core 38, CLI 436 and packaged Harness 9 tests passed with retry=0. SDK HostedHarnessClient 28, Broker 637 (2 macOS skips) and Server 654 (1 existing Linux-only macOS skip) completed with zero failures/errors. SDK/Broker/Server clean builds and explicit Checkstyle passed; Broker/Server SpotBugs passed. Two consecutive clean incremental self-audits and independent cross-package/main-integration reviews found no confirmed defects; full PR diff hash a2fd7e0c1d8e0b823038921401a350427380793ee364a12551a64960cdbba798. No completed final stage was repeated for this commit.

Independent test-engineer verification is VERIFIED_FIXED on the exact final bundle and final SDK/Broker/Server class snapshots: three actual packaged cancellation scenarios, four isolated cancellation/lifecycle controls, fifteen real Store rollback transactions, four expired/SEALED identity controls, and six actual bundled Harness → final Java Controller/Store/H2 → fresh connector cleanup scenarios (CLOSE/DELETE × active/expired/SEALED). Each successor issued one original-ID detach, with no load/lifecycle/model call; CLOSE ended CLOSED with no retirement, DELETE ended DELETED with one retirement, and every original writer ended SEALED. Two further actual activation-renew requests were held before entering the Store transaction, then released after detach/completion: CLOSE returned 409 managed_session_writer_conflict and DELETE 409 tool_output_session_retired, with journal revision and transaction count unchanged at 2. The barrier held no database lock. All owned JVMs, Harness children, listeners and temporary roots were cleaned up; exact bundle SHA256 79a1f5524c78e4c998ff145ec4fce32e5534135890ca255f0031ed935454b1f4.

The bridge invokes real final Java Controller/Store transactions with a fixed owned tenant context, so Spring authentication filters are outside this probe. It uses H2, a fake model and no Hook catalog, and creates no physical worker. These affected-regression checks are distinct from full physical L3 acceptance.

Post-push bounded snapshot: MERGEABLE / REVIEW_REQUIRED, 5 passed, 19 pending, 0 failed on 075d36d; this is separate from local verification. No old-head CI retry was consumed; the verified code fix supersedes that head and starts fresh CI. Full pagination currently shows no submitted reviews, inline comments or review threads: resolved 0/0, remaining unresolved 0. These results do not substitute for maintainer approval.

Complete physical Linux acceptance remains pending: real lifecycle Hook commands, mount/host/boot/PID identity, same-Workspace bytes and neighboring holders, and every distinct-process crash boundary. Actual packaged processes with transport fixtures and actual Java Store/H2 transactions do not establish those deployment results. No MySQL/MariaDB suite was rerun in this batch and no historical database was restored. Unknown effects remain indefinitely recovery_blocked; no force-delete channel or L4 scope was added.


本轮跟进自动评审 21600 秒超时,没有正式已提交评审或 inline 线程。部分工具输出作为线索,在实际 5f64304 上独立核实后,仅修复确认的正确性问题;最终提交 075d36d 已同步 main 98b0255。已修复 Store 故障阻止认证取消、接管缓存为空时跳过 detach、非法 journal 在生命周期校验中 NPE,以及原过期/SEALED writer 清理阻塞。接管凭原 Session ID 和当前 claim 清理,不为恢复 client ID 加载 Runtime 或重放 Hook;永久围栏和清理授权通过后停续租、直接封存,不追加 activation release。普通/legacy close 仍记录 release,过期 writer 的新 Hook、journal 提交与续租仍被拒绝,完成仍核对 effects 与原 Runtime 停机证明。

未推送的中间 f41 提交虽通过本地门禁,但真实打包 Harness→Java Store/H2 联调发现过期/SEALED detach 仍追加 journal 并返回503;因此重置自审和验证,完成显式不追加的修复,没有吞掉未知提交错误或放宽写入权限。未证实的 Runtime/缓存权限/scheduler 指控未采纳;广泛覆盖、命名、性能、OpenAPI 文案等建议按约五轮后仅修 Critical 的规则延期,不扩大 L4。main 批量查询、activation 状态缓存、Broker 原子 release 与续租调度修复保留;V32、V35–V39 逐字节不变,L3 SQL 顺延 V40 且内容不变,双语设计与 PR 迁移说明同步。

精确干净提交的唯一最终门禁通过 build/typecheck/bundle、40个迁移唯一性、Core38、CLI436、打包Harness9(retry=0)、SDK28、Broker637(macOS跳过2项)、Server654(macOS既有Linux专用1skip),零失败/错误;clean构建、显式Checkstyle及Broker/Server SpotBugs通过。两轮连续干净增量自审和独立跨包/main整合评审无确认缺陷,完整PR diffhash为a2fd7e0c1d8e0b823038921401a350427380793ee364a12551a64960cdbba798。独立测试工程师在精确最终 bundle 和 Java 类快照上标记 VERIFIED_FIXED:实际打包取消3场景、独立取消/生命周期控制4项、真实 Store 回滚15场景、过期/SEALED身份控制4场景、实际 Harness→Java Controller/Store/H2→全新 connector 清理6场景(CLOSE/DELETE×active/expired/SEALED)。每次接管仅一次原ID detach,无load/lifecycle/model调用;CLOSE为CLOSED、退役0,DELETE为DELETED、退役1,原writer均SEALED。另两次真实activation续租请求在进入Store事务前暂停,清理完成后放行分别返回409 writer_conflict/session_retired,journal revision与事务数仍为2;屏障未持数据库锁。全部本轮自有JVM/Harness/listener/root已清理。桥接固定自有tenant,未覆盖Spring认证过滤器,使用H2、假模型且无Hook catalog/实体worker;本提交未重复已完成的最终门禁阶段。

推送后有界快照为 MERGEABLE/REVIEW_REQUIRED,新head 5通过/19待完成/0失败;与本地验证分开记录。当前线程 0/0、剩余0,旧 head 重试消耗0/3;新 head CI 单独跟进。完整 Linux 实体 Hook、mount/host/boot/PID、同 Workspace 共享文件与邻居 holder、全部独立服务崩溃边界仍未验收;实际进程加传输夹具和 Store/H2 不替代部署验收。本轮未重跑 MySQL/MariaDB suite,也未恢复旧数据库。unknown 仍可无限期阻塞,不增加强制删除。

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] Itemized response to review 5444602220 body / 评审正文逐项回应

The new Critical R1-1 is fixed in a98d5342fdadb1a82f7a83a1a458152a9550c96e. All30 posted inline items receive separate deduplicated replies;29 Suggestions remain individually deferred or declined under Critical-only scope. The six body references below were checked against the final exact source; they contain historical evidence, not six new verified defects. Unverified budget-limited claims are not promoted to confirmed findings.

新Critical R1-1已修复;30条inline分别回应,29项Suggestion逐项说明延期/拒绝。以下6条正文引用已核对当前精确源码,保留历史归属,不将预算未核验的claim当确认缺陷,也不制造inline。

Reference / 引用 Current assessment 当前核验
6031870295 Maintainer real Linux re-verification at 2c4036c reports F1/R3-1, F2, F3 resolved. Current original-owner acquire(expected), binding/generation checks, both-language Store/coordinator-first rollout, and retained main integration mechanisms remain in the final source. This is historical rig evidence, not physical acceptance of a98d. 维护者实际 Linux 复验针对旧2c4,报告F1/R3-1、F2、F3已解决。当前原owner/expected binding-generation 与 Store/coordinator先部署机制保留;不把旧 rig 结果称为 a98d 实体验收。
5975128743 Author action/evidence table contains successive exact-head results and later corrections. It reports F1 original-owner preflight, F2 rollout, and F3 preservation, and distinguishes unknown effects from replay. Current source retains these mechanisms; each numerical gate/result remains attributed to its own commit, not carried forward as a new test run. E2E保留各精确head结果及更正,数量不挪计到新head。原Runtime preflight、unknown阻塞、无替代重放保持。
5998902554 R3 itemized response describes confirmed writer/claim identity, transaction rejection, cancelled settlement, identity-before-fence, and captured SDK detach fixes plus declined/deferred suggestions. Current relevant source keeps claim/ACL/original writer gates and independent mutation revalidation. The reviewer budget omission supplies no new exact-source defect. R3已处理writer/claim/ACL、事务拒绝、取消结算与捕获SDK detach;当前对应围栏和mutation复验保留。预算未审完不构成新具体缺陷。
5998908549 R3 summary accounts for 54 canonical items and five fixes while disclosing bounded component/native and physical limits. Current source keeps current-claim authority and ordinary/lifecycle distinction. A historical C=0 and test count do not establish new-head full acceptance. R3的54项与五fix及组件/物理限制是历史,不当新head全验收或C=0。当前claim权威与ordinary/lifecycle区分保持。
5999856763 This follow-up reopened F1/R3-1 and clarified F2 before the later original-runtime preflight fix. It is chronology, not an independently still-open code defect: current Hook runtime path reacquires expected original binding/generation before dispatch, validates saved identities, and preserves blocked outcomes on failure. 此文是后来F1修复之前重新打开的时间线。当前Hook在新派发前恢复原binding/gen、核验原身份,失败仍blocked,不把旧文当当前未修复。
6007436477 R4 action table records native lock-order and ordinary cached-authorization corrections, plus per-item coverage/performance deferrals. Current ordinary-cache failure fencing, identity checks, captured detach, and original-runtime controls remain. Historical source/evidence is not silently represented as re-executed at a98d. R4原锁序及ordinary cache修正、逐项性能/覆盖延期保留。当前失败围栏/currentclaim/originalRuntime仍在,旧执行数量不重复计为 a98d。

@doudouOUC

doudouOUC commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] L3 W1c integration and review 5444602220 — action / validation report

Final delivered commit: a98d5342fdadb1a82f7a83a1a458152a9550c96e; unpublished W1c parent d0aa0d94ef6838711ad134bcc974392d7037f07f preserves delivered4f94 and main1162 histories. No rebase, force push, PR merge, review dismissal or Ready/Draft change.

最终提交 a98d534,保留未推d0aa的W1c整合及维护者全部历史;没有rebase/force/mergePR/dismiss/ReadyDraft操作。本批只完成必要契约整合及确认的安全Critical修复,不扩L4。

Action Result / evidence 行动与证据
W1c actual conflict + migration collision Independent immutable reproduction:6files/10regions, actualFlyway duplicateV48; minimal unions. Only unpublished L3 SQL renamedV51, content SHA2560eb9b3be141b4b83bbcf81c6972b1795890a00e92ee171ceba4cc1bb61416f4b; all50main migrations byte-exact,49SQL+2Java=51unique. 真实冲突及V48碰撞独立复现;最小union,L3仅文件名V51,main50迁移逐字节保留。
Native placement/retention deadlock Original supported ABORTED-migration replay vs current-claim stopped/SEALED lifecycle cleanup:actualMySQL1213/40001, lifecycle-B victim, positive row/wait witness. Reorder only two existing locks placement→retention. At exactd0aa final pair ran once:both successful, SERIALIZED/zero deadlock, actual placement wait before retention, protected persisted facts unchanged. 原生锁环实测;只重排既有两锁。d0aa最终pair一次,原claim7、effectsreceipt/permanentDRAINING/SEALED原writer保留,无Runtime/worker/model新派发。
Upgrade expectation Original compiled target47 method once red because expected48..50 omitted actual51; existing prior-row comparison passed. Add only51; final updated original method once green atd0aa. FreshMySQL schema prep is not full deployment/DB matrix acceptance. 原断言只补51,前迁移行不变断言保留;修前红/修后绿各归属d0aa,不挪计a98d执行。
New R1-1 Critical Narrow DaemonException OR IllegalStateException catch returns false. Actual-client baseline red/finala98d green once; protocol1=true/protocol0=false. New compiled unit positive once in Server gate and same new test with old production exact-exception negative once. Actual adoption with deterministic retained-reader-reference surrogate, not observed concurrent publicHTTP500. 关闭client能力读取不再异常逃出;不catch-all、不授执行权。真实adoption+保留旧引用替身限制明确,未称实测公共500。
Exact a98d final gate Three stages each once/exit0:build230.89s,typecheck74.36s,Servercleanverify+explicitCheckstyle205.63s.109SurefireXML:1367total=1366pass/1existingmacOSskip/0failure/error; SpotBugs0. CheckstyleemptyXML0file/0error is not testlint or coverage. No new bundle/SDK/Core/CLI/Harness/Broker/nativeDB suite. a98d最终3门禁全0;Server1366通过/1既有macOSskip。缓存/空静态XML不当覆盖;没有重做未变的旧门禁。
Historical d0aa gate Six stages each once/exit0:build/typecheck/bundle/bilingualformat/Brokercleaninstall+Checkstyle/Servercleanverify+Checkstyle. Broker745=743pass/2opt-in skips (Kubernetes property/explicitworkerbundle absent),Server1366=1365pass/1macOSskip. BrokerCheckstyle72productionfile nodes/0error,Server0files/0error,SB0both. These are parent evidence, not a98d reruns; SDK actual compilation remains source/POM-identical805c history; bundle remainsd0aa. d0aa六成功门禁不重复;Broker两skip为opt-in不是macOS。SDK/bundle历史归属保留,不冒充a98d新suite。
Evidence and review Root10832source/1324actual files/122dependencies; d0aanativefreeze1059selectedfiles/118dependencies,28-file manifest. a98d final hashes/origins unchanged during independent verification. Two consecutive clean self-audits and independent exact wholePR/source/evidence bounded push review; not maintainer/architecture/fullphysical approval. FullPR85paths536661bytesSHA25638b6a8cea1a2938d1fc3ae91b92330d10337f7defc91dc618f1edf5f3d2825cf. 数量是来源/完整性记录,不是覆盖率;两轮干净自审及独立精确评审不替代维护者批准。
Cleanup This phase newly owned MySQLPID55860/port61828 had identity-proven normal shutdown0,3schemas audited/removed,PID/socket/PIDfile/port/root absent; permanently retired. New capability HTTP resources normally stopped and removed, no historical resource operation. 55860及全部历史MySQL永不恢复;仅本阶段自有临时资源核验清理。
Scope and limits Idle ACTIVE local hosted-workspace-files/1:End beforeDelete, durable effects→permanentDRAINING/detach, original binding/gen/handle stop proof, atomic retirement. L2 CLOSED/ARCHIVEDdelete/protocol0/currentclaim/credential/writer/ACL/cwd/originalRuntime/no replacement/unknown indefinitelyblocked preserved. Store/coordinator first,Harness later,no404authorizationfallback. No files2/Shell/MCP/CSI/channel lifecycle/H4b/L4/physicalerase. FullLinux/Springrestart/mount/hostbootPID/neighbor/allcrash/fullDB/load remain pending; O(history)/tenantserialization costs require maintainer architecture/load assessment. 原范围/围栏/部署顺序保持;物理及完整负载验收仍pending,不承诺固定延迟。
Prior red evidence Old4f94CI-FORMAT-1 and oldCLI red/unknown remain historical, not claimed fixed by this batch. No unrelated CI/timeout/doc/test edits and no CI rerun; per new head0/3. New-head CI snapshot is added below after collection. 不将旧红gate、本地green或main标题当当前CI修复;没有rerun。

All30 items below belong only to review5444602220 at4f94; earlier R1 numbering is independent. One Critical fixed;29 Suggestions individually deferred, with proposed unsafe mechanisms explicitly declined where stated. Missing tests are Suggestions under AGENTS. No follow-up issue/PR is fabricated.

以下30项仅对应本次5444602220,不混历史R1编号。1Critical修复,29Suggestion逐项延期/不采纳;性能/架构成本仍交维护者评估。

Item Severity Decision English rationale 中文理由
R1-1 Critical Fixed / 已修复 Fixed in a98d534. Capability reads now catch the existing DaemonException plus the actual closed-client IllegalStateException and return false; this is a narrow catch, not a catch-all RuntimeException. Exact frozen real-client baseline threw, final read returned false, and protocol1/absent-protocol0 controls stayed true/false. The new compiled unit passed once in the final Server suite; the same new test against old production failed with the exact closed-client exception. Actual adoption plus a deterministic retained-reader-reference surrogate was tested; a concurrent public HTTP500 was not observed. No authority or Runtime operation is granted by the predicate. a98d534 已修复:仅额外捕获实际关闭 client 的 IllegalStateException 并返回 false,保留原 DaemonException,不扩大成 catch-all。冻结实际 client 修前抛异常、修后返回 false;协议1/缺省协议0仍为 true/false。新增编译后用例在最终 Server suite 一次通过,同一新测试配旧生产类按原异常失败。验证包含真实 adoption 与确定性 reader 保留旧引用替身,未实测并发公共接口500;该 predicate 不授执行权。
R1-2 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The retained-runtime barrier exists in both begin and completion cwd checks and refuses any same-tenant/Harness non-RELEASED runtime. The deviation section could cross-reference that premise more clearly. This is a documentation clarification, not a missing production fence. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。cwd 准入与完成均保留非 RELEASED runtime 拒绝围栏;偏差论证可明确引用前提,属于文档澄清,不是围栏缺失。
R1-4 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The 22-route text names the historical slice-A baseline while the later registry section reports 24 current internal routes. Wording can distinguish chronology more clearly; route policy consumers derive current registry rules and are not gated by the prose count. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。22条属于历史切片A,后文24条是当前 registry;措辞可区分历史与现状。生产准入并不依赖文档数字。
R1-5 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The writerId case receives the boot-generation refusal before adoption comparison. Asserting its named error and separating the two gates would improve test specificity. Both production guards are present; no authorization gap is established. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。writerId 用例先被 boot-generation gate 拒绝。可分开测试并断言具体 code;两处生产拒绝仍存在,未证实授权缺口。
R1-6 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Current CLI authorize/acquire request identities and recovery fields match Java parsing and original-binding validation. Real wire-path coverage would protect this contract; mocks and repository tests do not prove the complete round trip, but no current mismatch is found. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。当前 CLI authorize/acquire 的身份与 recovery 字段和 Java 解析、原 binding 校验一致。补真实 wire 用例有价值,未发现当前不匹配。
R1-7 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The two literal lifecycle header names exactly match RuntimeLifecycleAuthority constants and the Java parser. A shared fixture would protect future drift. Invalid or absent authority still fails closed at admission, so current duplication is not a bypass. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。header 字面量与 Java 常量及 parser 一致,共享 fixture 可防漂移;缺失或无效 authority 仍拒绝准入,重复不是现有绕过。
R1-8 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Core request header literals match Java controller and Broker constants. A cross-language fixture is useful follow-up. Authority-null fenced commits allow only existing settlement transitions and forbid new lifecycle dispatch; no present typo or downgrade bypass is demonstrated. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。Core header 与 Java controller/Broker 一致。无 authority 的 fenced commit 仅允许已有 settlement,拒绝新派发;未证实降级绕过。跨语言 fixture 延期。
R1-9 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Client creation is cached only after success, so unavailable Harness projections can repeat blocking attempts per eligible row. This is a real cost/availability concern for maintainer follow-up; the supplied arithmetic is not an observed supported-load failure in this review. Cache/backoff changes need generation and freshness semantics and are outside the confirmed Critical patch. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。client 只在成功后缓存,不可用时每行可重复阻塞,成本与可用性值得后续评估。此次没有支持负载失效测量;cache/backoff 涉及 generation/freshness,不扩张 Critical 修复。
R1-10 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Cold client creation negotiates capabilities under clientLock; successful clients are cached. Read projection latency and caller contention merit follow-up, but no independent supported-load regression is established beyond R1-1. Moving or caching the predicate changes deployment/freshness behavior and should not broaden this fix. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。冷构建在 clientLock 下协商 capabilities,成功后缓存。读取延迟及竞争需后续评估;除R1-1外未取得支持负载失败证据。改变缓存语义延期。
R1-12 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Coordinator protocol-1 settlement and error classification branches are present, with current operation identity and blocked/retry handling. A composition test would improve confidence; missing coverage is Suggestion under AGENTS, not evidence that the branch is wrong. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。协议1 settlement、当前 operation 身份和 blocked/retry 分类存在。组合测试可增强验证;缺测试按 AGENTS 属 Suggestion,不是分支错误证据。
R1-13 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. hasRetainedRuntimeSession correctly predicates tenant, Harness ID, and non-RELEASED state. A supporting index can reduce scan cost; no measured functional or supported-load failure is presented. An extra migration is outside this Critical-only sync. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。查询正确限制 tenant、Harness 与非 RELEASED 状态。索引可减成本,但未有实测功能/负载失败;额外 migration 不进入本次 Critical-only sync。
R1-14 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Claim/retry take placement before lifecycle/operation state, preserving serialization with drain and migration admission. The unconditional cost affects legacy work too. Selective locking needs race-safe protocol/state selection; no correctness defect is shown and removing the guard could weaken authority fencing. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。claim/retry 保留 placement-before-lifecycle/operation 锁序,成本涉及 legacy。选择性锁须防状态选择竞态;删 guard 可能削弱围栏,未证实正确性缺陷。
R1-15 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Dispatch detection and settlement validation walk similar records but enforce different transition predicates, including previous-null and new-dispatch restrictions. No semantic drift is present. Extracting their loops is a refactor rather than a required correctness correction. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。循环相似但派发与 settlement 转移条件不同,包括 previous-null/新派发限制。未发现漂移,提取 helper 属重构。
R1-16 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Lifecycle writer acquisition performs a permissive preflight followed by the stricter non-draining check. This duplicates reads, but the stricter gate retains acquisition refusal and placement is already held before retention. Simplification is optional and must preserve that ordering. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。writer acquire 的宽松与严格非 draining 检查有重复读取,但安全 gate 与 placement-before-retention 仍在。优化延期须保留锁序。
R1-17 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Production mapping uses the canonical operation constructor with explicit lifecycle fields. Shorter compatibility constructors default to protocol 0; no current caller selecting a wrong slot/default is demonstrated. Removing overloads is API cleanup, not a current behavioral fix. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。生产 mapper 用完整 constructor;兼容短构造器缺省协议0。未有当前调用错选参数或丢能力,移除 overload 属清理。
R1-18 Suggestion Deferred; reject proposed unsafe mechanism where stated / 延期;注明的不安全替代不采纳 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. WorkspaceExecutionStore invokes claim validation as a preflight before subsequent external work. Its statement-scoped lock does not span that work, and wrapping this method in a transaction would also release locks on return. Broker/store mutation sites revalidate current authority in their own transaction. An H2 after-return lock observation alone does not demonstrate execution authorization bypass. Transaction-boundary clarity is follow-up, not a proven Critical. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。claim 是外部 I/O 前预检,局部事务亦在返回时释放锁;实际 Broker/Store mutation 自有事务重新验 authority。H2 返回后无锁观察不证明绕过,边界清理延期。
R1-19 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. requireIdleJournal currently rejects nonzero compaction and unsettled journal turn state. Dedicated negative fixtures for both predicates would strengthen coverage. Their absence is not a missing guard or a proven unsafe admission. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。生产实际拒绝非零 compaction 和未 settled turn。专门负例可补;缺用例不等于缺围栏。
R1-20 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The regex spelling splits the same newline delimiter as the alternative. Pattern-allocation/style consistency is optional; no journal parsing semantic defect is found. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。换行 split 两种拼写语义等价。Pattern 成本/风格是微优化,未发现解析缺陷。
R1-21 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Both languages derive the lifecycle occurrence from SHA-256 of compact JSON [event, operationId]; Java uses a dedicated compact mapper independent of application formatting. A shared golden fixture would guard future changes. No current cross-language identity mismatch is present. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。两种语言均对 compact JSON [event, operationId] 做 SHA-256;Java 独立紧凑 mapper 不受应用格式配置影响。golden fixture 延期,当前未有不一致。
R1-22 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Named refusal codes are constructed and propagated alongside the shared message. Code-specific assertions would pin diagnostic classification more precisely. This is test completeness; no wrong code or admitted invalid operation is established. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。具体拒绝 code 已构造传播,共用 message。补 code 断言增强覆盖;未见错误 code 或非法准入。
R1-23 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The DELETE OpenAPI description can enumerate session_operation_active/state conflicts more fully; generic 409 and production state/operation rejection remain present. Prose omission is not an endpoint behavior defect. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。DELETE prose 可列全 operation/state conflict;generic409 与生产拒绝仍在。文案遗漏不是端点行为缺陷。
R1-24 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Coordinator keeps the protocol-0 close branch and persisted legacy rows retain protocol 0 defaults. The updated test double emphasizes L3 and could gain explicit bound legacy reclaim coverage. No source removal of L2 behavior is found. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。coordinator 保留协议0 close 分支,历史行缺省协议0。可补 legacy reclaim 用例,未发现 L2 行为被删除。
R1-25 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. A task-start latch plus a 100 ms future timeout does not establish a server-side DB waiter; scheduler or connection delay can make this assertion weak. Production placement fencing is present. Strengthening portable MySQL/MariaDB instrumentation is a test improvement. The separate private W1c witness has positive actual lock-wait evidence but is not claimed as coverage for this whole IT suite. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。start latch 加100ms timeout 可只测调度/建连,不能证明DB waiter;生产 fence 仍在。补可移植观察延期,私有 W1c witness 不代表完整IT通过。
R1-26 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Accepted matrix cases assert journal progress rather than every projected Stage H row field; richer durable postconditions would catch more projection regressions. Actual projection code and rejected rollback assertions exist. A hypothetical mutation surviving the current assertion is a coverage gap, not a current wrong projection. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。接受矩阵可补 StageH 持久字段后置断言;实际 projection/拒绝回滚存在。假想 mutation 逃过断言属覆盖缺口,不是当前错误投影。
R1-27 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The actual SDK parse site uses the five-argument constructor; the shorter package-private overload defaults to unsupported protocol 0. An unused compatibility overload can be removed in cleanup, but no current caller loses an advertised capability. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。实际 SDK parser 使用5参;未用短 overload 缺省 unsupported协议0。可后续清理,未有当前 caller 丢能力。
R1-28 Suggestion Deferred; reject proposed unsafe mechanism where stated / 延期;注明的不安全替代不采纳 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Admission takes the tenant placement domain to serialize decision/state changes with lifecycle and migration transitions. The extra transaction/round trips are real; no supported throughput regression is measured here. A lock-free replacement would require equivalent concurrent fencing proof and cannot be applied merely as an optimization. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。tenant placement 将准入与 lifecycle/migration 状态变更串行化,事务成本属实,未有吞吐失败实测。lock-free 替代须等价围栏证明,不能仅为优化删除。
R1-29 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. Current HTTP parser catches malformed/half lifecycle authority as the named 400 and reads recoveryGeneration as the string sent by the CLI. Recovery validates expected saved binding/generation. Real route contract tests are useful follow-up; no actual parser mismatch is found. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。当前 parser 对半对/非法 authority 返回指定400,按 CLI string 读 recoveryGeneration,并验原 binding。补route用例延期,未发现实际不匹配。
R1-31 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. authorizeLifecycle omits requireOpen and can return a read-only authority result after broker closure. Subsequent acquire/control requires an open broker and cannot complete execution through this result. A consistent early closed response is useful, but no worker side effect, replacement runtime, or completed lifecycle operation follows solely from this preflight. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。关闭后预检可能仍返回只读授权,但 acquire/control 拒绝 closed broker,不能仅靠它完成操作。可统一早期错误,未证实 worker副作用/replacement/错误完成。
R1-32 Suggestion Deferred / 延期 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The non-cancelled beginDispatch branch currently calls requireHarnessAdmission before transport execution. The existing cancelled case intentionally skips new-execution admission for settlement. A regression test for the non-cancelled queued window would strengthen coverage; the claimed missing guard is hypothetical, not present source. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。非 cancelled dispatch 当前在 transport 前检查 admission;cancelled settlement 故意跳过新执行准入。补排队窗口回归延期,删 guard 是假设。
R1-33 Suggestion Deferred; reject proposed unsafe mechanism where stated / 延期;注明的不安全替代不采纳 Deferring under the repository's approximately-five-round Critical-only policy. The per-dispatch tenant guard has untimed waiting and a serialization cost. It enforces atomic admission against close/delete and maintenance. This finding shares the R1-28 performance concern, not an observed new lock cycle; weakening the guard without a replacement proof would regress safety. Maintainer workload/architecture review remains needed. 按仓库五轮后 Critical-only 规则延期。tenant guard 有串行/无超时成本,但负责原子准入。与R1-28同类,未有新实测锁环;无等价证明不能削弱 guard,维护者负载评估仍待进行。

Thread snapshot before replies:72 historical resolved +30 addressed new threads awaiting reply/resolve. The actual remaining count will be appended after full-pagination verification. / 回应前72旧线程已解决,30新线程待回应与resolve;实际终态另附。

Completion supersedes interim awaiting statuses above / 完成状态覆盖上文临时等待状态

All 30 addressed threads were resolved after individual replies; full pagination confirms 102/102 resolved, zero remaining. Formal CHANGES_REQUESTED remains. Follow-up #13354 (comment) records df1ec native fixture corrections and three selected local methods passing once. Original a98d MariaDB CI job112900816100 failed with one assertion failure and one1205 lock-wait error among125 native cases; the new local MySQL result does not convert that old run to success. Separate a98d Qwen CI run37652977148 reports failure with success/skipped jobs only; causeUNKNOWN and no rerun.

原30项逐条回应后均已resolve,全分页确认102/102resolved、剩0,正式CHANGES_REQUESTED保留。最新df1ec原生夹具修复及三个选定本地method各一次通过见新行动表。原a98d MariaDB CI125项1failure/1error(1205)仍为原红,不能用MySQL本地green改写;另QwenCIrunfailure与jobs成功/跳过不一致仍UNKNOWN,不rerun。

@doudouOUC

doudouOUC commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] Native lifecycle fixture compatibility — df1ecdc

Final commit: df1ecdc95f9ceb2f8c19dff0404ed894b1d68542, parent a98d5342fdadb1a82f7a83a1a458152a9550c96e. This follow-up contains only two native Java test files, 29 insertions and 10 deletions. Every other tracked blob, including production code, migrations, workflows, profiles and timeouts, is byte-identical to a98d. The earlier W1c integration, original placement/retention lock ordering fix and R1-1 closed-client capability fix remain in history; their executions are recorded separately in the previous action and validation table.

Item Verified trigger and action Exact evidence and limits
Native upgrade fixture The V31 close row retains all 24 original values and gains five fields after current migrations. The inherited assertion expected only three additions. Keep the original row/receipt checks and explicitly assert all five defaults, including protocol zero and null lifecycle effects. Original compiled a98d method failed once with expected 27/actual 29. Final compiled df1ec method passed once, preserved close 24→29 and Session 24→26, completed the independent legacy delete and recorded one retirement.
Native deletion scheduling fixture The record transaction holds placement while waiting for the deliberately held extension row. Synchronous deletion waits for placement and prevents the test thread releasing that row. Dispatch deletion through the existing transactional helper, positively observe both waits, release the holder and await both successful transactions. Original compiled a98d method failed once with vendor 1205/SQLSTATE 40001, not a 1213 deadlock. Final compiled df1ec method passed once; actual extension revision 2, task journal 2, Session DELETING, DELETE PENDING/generation 0. This is the intended serialized admission outcome, not completed retirement. Existing time limits are unchanged.
Existing post-delete control Keep the entire adjacent method unchanged. Executed once on final compiled output: extension revision 2/task journal 1, active writer prevents retirement, sealing the original writer permits completion, Session and journal DELETED, DELETE COMPLETED/generation 1, leases cleared and retirement 1.
Original remote failure Actual a98d virtual checkout 23d7e66111dd45342acfc0fda8cc5381a2697625 has the exact a98d tree. MariaDB job 112900816100 reported native 125 cases with one failure and one error; inventory was skipped. Complete raw log read independently: 9,767,302 bytes/49,271 lines, SHA256 6db0181d692fa275322cb35cfa445c37216180e7a2955711d51237640962f3cf. Local red reproductions confirm these two fixture incompatibilities. No CI rerun or infrastructure/flake claim.
Separate old workflow status a98d Qwen Code CI run 37652977148 and its check suite report failure while fresh full job/check-run lists contain six successful and three skipped jobs. All nine exposed annotations are warnings. Cause remains unknown; no specific failed product job is exposed. No guessed source change or rerun, and this fixture change does not claim to fix that workflow status.
Review handling All 30 items from review 5444602220 were already answered individually, with R1-1 fixed and the other 29 given individual deferral/rejection reasons. Its six historical body references were answered in 6042407742. Full REST/GraphQL pagination confirms 102/102 threads resolved, zero remaining. No new native-fix inline thread was manufactured. Formal CHANGES_REQUESTED remains.

Exact clean df1ec final gates ran once: build (133.07 s), typecheck (39.41 s), and Java test-compile plus explicit Checkstyle (5.90 s), all exit 0. The Java stage compiled 156 test source files; it did not run a unit suite. Cached production-scope Checkstyle XML has zero file nodes/errors and is not a test-lint or coverage claim. No additional bundle, SpotBugs, full Server/Core/CLI/Harness/Broker/SDK or complete native database suite was run. The bundle and Broker retain d0aa attribution; SDK output retains its historical attribution.

Independent test-engineer verification used frozen actual df1ec classes, with no source edits or product rebuild. The two original red methods and three final green methods each ran once, retry 0. Final timings were 1.914/3.941/1.986 s. All 1,324 actual/frozen Java files and 118 selected frozen dependencies were preserved; the 314-entry terminal evidence manifest was checked. These counts are provenance, not coverage. Local MySQL 8.4.11/macOS differs from remote MariaDB 10.11.18/Linux; the complete 125-case matrix was not rerun locally.

All seven new schemas were dropped. The identity-verified owned instance PID 6740/port 64860/root /private/tmp/postpush-ci-5d97e15a-6f4 shut down normally; PID, port, socket, pidfile and root are absent and permanently retired. Zero historical resource operations. Three private collector/read-only preparation failures were preserved separately, stopped dependencies and made zero product calls; corrected fresh guards resumed only unexecuted work.

Two RESET consecutive clean self-audits and independent exact whole-PR/source/evidence review completed before this normal push; their recorded conclusion is limited to push readiness. It is not maintainer approval, an architecture/load verdict or physical acceptance. Full PR: 85 paths/540,766 bytes, SHA256 7d8519dccfb1e4429881d77a82b2fa62ee03b8043a6ce0a81a5734ee6a6ad12f; increment SHA256 2516da8821b6df9b40dc2c4e73a7d7deac8bf12be760cbb9434cfeff8f5b71e0.

L3 remains idle ACTIVE local hosted-workspace-files/1: Close End; Delete complete End then Delete; persisted effects followed by permanent DRAINING/detach, proof for every original binding/generation/handle, then atomic retirement. Protocol zero/L2 closed or archived delete, issued credentials/current claim/writer/ACL/cwd/original Runtime, unknown indefinitely blocked, and no replacement/replay remain. L3 SQL V51 retains SHA256 0eb9b3be141b4b83bbcf81c6972b1795890a00e92ee171ceba4cc1bb61416f4b; all 50 main migrations remain byte-identical, 51 versions unique. No files/2, Shell/MCP/CSI/channel lifecycle, physical erase or L4 expansion. Full Linux/Spring restart/all-process crash, physical mount/host/boot/PID/neighbor holder, complete database/load acceptance remain pending; O(history)/tenant serialization needs maintainer architecture/load assessment.


[中文] 原生生命周期夹具兼容修复 — df1ecdc

最终提交 df1ecdc95f9ceb2f8c19dff0404ed894b1d68542,父提交 a98d。本次仅改两个原生 Java 测试文件,29 行新增、10 行删除;其余 tracked blob、生产代码、迁移、workflow、profile 和 timeout 全部与 a98d 逐字节相同。此前 W1c 整合、placement→retention 锁序修复及 R1-1 关闭 client 后能力查询修复保留,历史执行归属见上一行动验证表,不挪计为 df1ec 新执行。

项目 已核验问题与行动 精确验证及限制
旧行升级夹具 原 V31 close 的 24 个字段值保持,升级实际新增五列;旧断言仅计三列。保留原行/receipt 断言,补精确 protocol 0/effects null 两项默认值。 原 a98d compiled method 一次红:预期 27/实际 29。df1ec 一次绿:close 24→29、Session 24→26 原值不变,旧 receipt 保持,独立 legacy delete 完成、退役 1。
删除并发夹具 记录提交持 placement 等原 held extension row;同步 Delete 又等 placement,导致测试线程不能释放 holder。使用既有事务 helper 异步 Delete,正向观察两等待,再释放 holder 并等待两事务成功。 原 method 一次红:1205/40001 lock wait,不是 1213 死锁。最终一次绿:revision 2/task journal 2/DELETING、DELETE PENDING/generation 0;是串行准入结局,不能称退役完成。原 timeout 未改。
删除后抑制控制 相邻原 method 全字节保持。 最终 compiled method 一次绿:revision 2/task journal 1;活 writer 拒绝退役,seal 原 writer 后完成,Session/journal DELETED、DELETE COMPLETED/gen 1、lease 清除、退役 1。
原真实 MariaDB CI job 112900816100/run 37652976921,virtual checkout 23d7e 的 tree 与 a98d 相同;native 125 项中 1 failure/1 error,inventory 跳过。 完整 9,767,302 字节/49,271 行日志已独立审读;本地原两红确认夹具契约不兼容。未重跑 CI,不推断 infra/flake。
另一个旧 workflow 状态 a98d run 37652977148/check suite 显示 failure,但 fresh 全分页九 jobs 为六 success、三 skipped,九 annotation 均 warning。 原因仍未知,没有已暴露的具体失败产品 job;不猜测性改源、不 rerun,不称本夹具改动修复此汇总状态。
评审 30 项已分别回应,R1-1 已修复,其余 29 项逐项延期/拒绝;正文六历史引用另有逐项回复。 全分页确认 102/102 resolved、剩 0;本次不制造 inline。正式 CHANGES_REQUESTED 保留。

精确 clean df1ec 三个最终阶段各一次:build 133.07 秒、typecheck 39.41 秒、Java test-compile+显式 Checkstyle 5.90 秒,全部 exit 0。156 是编译测试源数量,不是执行 suite;缓存生产范围 Checkstyle XML 0 file/0 error 不当 testlint/coverage。没有新增 bundle、SpotBugs 或完整 Server/Core/CLI/Harness/Broker/SDK/native suite;bundle/Broker 为 d0aa 历史,SDK 为历史产物。

test-engineer 冻结实际 df1ec 产物、未改源/重编译产品:原两失败 method 各一次红、最终三个选定 method 各一次绿,retry 0;1.914/3.941/1.986 秒。1,324 actual/frozen Java 文件、118 依赖、314 终态 evidence manifest hash 核验是归属证据,不能称覆盖率。MySQL 8.4.11/macOS 不冒充远端 MariaDB 10.11.18/Linux 或完整 125 项矩阵。

七个新 schema 全部 DROP,核验身份的自有 PID 6740/port 64860/root 正常 shutdown,PID/socket/pidfile/port/root 全不存在并永久退休。零历史资源操作。三个私有 collector/只读准备失败分别保留,非零时停止依赖、零产品调用;fresh guard 0 后仅继续此前未执行工作。两轮 RESET 连续干净自审及独立精确全 PR/源码/证据评审仅支持必要正常 push,不等于维护者、架构负载或实体部署验收批准。

范围及凭据/currentclaim/writer/ACL/cwd/原 Runtime、永久 DRAINING、原身份停机证明、protocol-zero/L2、unknown 无限 blocked 围栏保持。V51 SQL 内容及 main 50 迁移全保持、51 版本唯一;不扩 files/2、Shell/MCP/CSI/channel 生命周期、物理擦除或 L4。完整 Linux/Spring restart/all-process crash、实体 mount/host/boot/PID/neighbor holder/fullDB/load 仍 pending,O(history)/tenant 串行需维护者评审。旧 CLI 红/未知、G3 重建边界、registry 独立参数 partial 及延期项仍按历史保留,不声称本次解决。

Post-push observation / 推后实际快照

At 2026-10-07T17:51:05.556711+00:00, actual df1ec is OPEN/Ready, MERGEABLE/BLOCKED, CHANGES_REQUESTED. Complete pagination: 8 pass/16 pending/8 skipped/0 failed check contexts;10 exact-head workflow runs/33 jobs,4 completed-success/4 in-progress/1 queued/1 waiting, no failed job/run. This is an initial remote snapshot, not all-CI completion or maintainer approval. Full feedback pagination confirms37 issue comments/103 reviews/132 inline comments,102 threads and every thread-comment page;102/102resolved,zero remaining,no external finding. No second watcher or CI rerun.

Actual main57e347fae44dc8bde90adc8e4ad228c027534aee was independently statically audited:19 incremental paths/2 earlier PR overlaps/0 migrations;the two df1ec fixture paths have zero overlap. The previous hypothetical merge is clean, with exact main increments and preserved L3 additions; no necessary further integration. It was not built or tested. Final normal push followed a fresh successful guard. One earlier private review-schema lookup stopped before any push or external mutation and is preserved as failed preparation.

推后实际df1ec为OPEN/Ready、MERGEABLE/BLOCKED、CHANGES_REQUESTED;全分页8pass/16pending/8skip/0fail,10实际headrun/33jobs,4success/4in-progress/1queued/1waiting,无failedjob/run,不能称全CI终态或维护者批准。反馈37issue/103review/132inline/102threads及每comment全部页核验,102resolved剩0,无新externalfinding。没有第二watcher/CIrerun。actualmain57的19path/2旧PR重叠/零迁移已静态审计,本次两fixture零重叠,无必要同步;假想tree未build/test。最终normalpush在freshguard0后执行;此前私有review字段准备失败在任何push/外部mutation前停止,原失败保留。

@qwen-code-review-bot qwen-code-review-bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Partially reviewed — gaps disclosed.

Unresolved, please confirm:

  • [Critical] issue comment 6031870295 (@wenshao maintainer real-stack re-verification round 2) — measured at head 2c4036c, not the reviewed head df1ecdc; its mechanisms could not be re-ruled at this commit within this run's time budget
  • [Critical] 5 entries — not ruled on against the reviewed commit within this run's time budget:

Not reviewed: build-and-test — the MariaDB/MySQL failsafe lanes (-Pmysql-integration, -Phosted-harness-mysql, -Phosted-process-crashes, -Phosted-workspace-tools) did not run; no database service was available, so the PR's new WorkspaceLifecycleMySqlIT and ToolPublicationLifecycleMySqlIT were compiled but never executed.

Not reviewed: build-and-test — mutation and per-hunk test-efficacy probes returned no evidence (28 probed, all inconclusive, harnessValidated: null), so whether the new tests go red without the new behaviour was not measured.

Not reviewed: issue-fidelity — the closing-issue reference set could not be fetched (this gh version lacks closingIssuesReferences); fidelity was judged against #13164, which the PR names as its L3 target, and not against the formal closing set.

Not reviewed: posting — 71 confirmed-high Suggestions were resolved to anchors but not rendered into bilingual inline comments before this run's time budget expired; they are recorded in full in the saved findings artifact and the terminal report.

Not explored to full depth (tool budget reached): "agent reverse-audit (round 2)": whether RuntimeBrokerService.release(...) (:1495) applies requireHarnessAdmission — i.e. whether the broker.release() calls in the MCP and hook teardowns …; "agent reverse-audit (round 2)": whether the Store ever issues a bound detach or a load-time lifecycleAuthority for a session whose toolProfile is not HOSTED_WORKSPACE_FILE_PROFILE (the J…; "agent reverse-audit (round 2)": whether runSettleProjection / hosted-runtime-recovery.ts:194 issues a fenced broker call ( acquire , or a non-recovery control ) while a load-adopted authori…; "agent reverse-audit (round 2)": ManagedAgentStore.beginLifecycle(...) 's handling of closeSupported=false together with protocolVersion=1 — I could not read it before the ceiling, so the …; "agent reverse-audit (round 2)": whether authorize(exchange) still accepts a broker token from a Harness whose lease was lost — the exploitability half of Finding A's stale-predecessor trigge…, and 29 more.

Not reviewed: reverse audit — stopped before round 3 by the review time budget.

Mechanism health: this round did not close cleanly, so it withholds the incremental anchor — and the round it recovered had no anchor this round could use either — none at all, one with no certifier, one certified by an identity other than the one this round runs under, or one this round's fetch refused or resolved to the head — so the next review re-reads the whole diff unless recovery grafts an earlier own anchor that the round running it can use onto the complete work list this round leaves behind, and keeps doing so until a round's marker carries an anchor again or a graft lands that the round running it can use. (Stated, not acted on — this changes nothing about what the round posts.)

中文说明

仅完成部分审查,审查缺口已披露。

未决,请确认:共 6 条(原文未翻译,列表见上方英文部分)。

未审查(原文为英文):build-and-test — the MariaDB/MySQL failsafe lanes (-Pmysql-integration, -Phosted-harness-mysql, -Phosted-process-crashes, -Phosted-workspace-tools) did not run; no database service was available, so the PR's new WorkspaceLifecycleMySqlIT and ToolPublicationLifecycleMySqlIT were compiled but never executed.

未审查(原文为英文):build-and-test — mutation and per-hunk test-efficacy probes returned no evidence (28 probed, all inconclusive, harnessValidated: null), so whether the new tests go red without the new behaviour was not measured.

未审查(原文为英文):issue-fidelity — the closing-issue reference set could not be fetched (this gh version lacks closingIssuesReferences); fidelity was judged against #13164, which the PR names as its L3 target, and not against the formal closing set.

未审查(原文为英文):posting — 71 confirmed-high Suggestions were resolved to anchors but not rendered into bilingual inline comments before this run's time budget expired; they are recorded in full in the saved findings artifact and the terminal report.

未探索到全部深度(达到工具调用预算):"agent reverse-audit (round 2)":whether RuntimeBrokerService.release(...) (:1495) applies requireHarnessAdmission — i.e. whether the broker.release() calls in the MCP and hook teardowns …;"agent reverse-audit (round 2)":whether the Store ever issues a bound detach or a load-time lifecycleAuthority for a session whose toolProfile is not HOSTED_WORKSPACE_FILE_PROFILE (the J…;"agent reverse-audit (round 2)":whether runSettleProjection / hosted-runtime-recovery.ts:194 issues a fenced broker call ( acquire , or a non-recovery control ) while a load-adopted authori…;"agent reverse-audit (round 2)":ManagedAgentStore.beginLifecycle(...) 's handling of closeSupported=false together with protocolVersion=1 — I could not read it before the ceiling, so the …;"agent reverse-audit (round 2)":whether authorize(exchange) still accepts a broker token from a Harness whose lease was lost — the exploitability half of Finding A's stale-predecessor trigge…,另有 29 条。

未审查:反向审计——评审时间预算不足,未能开始第 3 轮。

机制健康:本轮未能干净收尾,因而扣留了增量锚点,而它恢复到的那一轮也没有留下本轮可用的锚点——要么完全没有、要么没有认证者、要么由本轮运行身份之外的身份认证、要么被本轮的获取拒绝或解析为头提交——因此下一次评审将重读整个 diff,除非恢复流程把本轮能使用的更早自有锚点嫁接到本轮留下的完整工作清单上;并会一直如此,直到某一轮的标记重新带上锚点,或落地的嫁接能被运行该轮的评审使用。(仅陈述,不据此行动——这不改变本轮发布的任何内容。)

— qwen3.8-max via Qwen Code /review (v0.25.0)

@doudouOUC

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] Review 5449654402 itemized response / 评审逐项回应

Exact candidate e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2 addresses the independently confirmed R2-5 storage-fence admission regression. The full artifact has 85 items: 7 Critical, 72 Suggestion, 6 Nice to have; 67 high/18 low confidence. The review body says 71 high Suggestions, which differs from its artifact. Confidence labels and inconclusive 28 mutation probes are not negative-efficacy evidence. Only R2-1 was posted inline; its separate response preserves the original idle barrier. No fabricated inline is created for body/artifact feedback.

精确候选仅修复独立确认的 R2-5;其余 84 项按本 PR 已超过五轮的 Critical-only 范围逐项拒绝或延期。正文与 artifact 数量不一致按真实 artifact 记录;28 个未决 mutation probe 不算负向效力证据。只有 R2-1 原 inline 另行回应,不制造 inline。

Item / 项目 Action / 处理 Assessment (EN) 核验与理由(中文)
R2-1 reject_current_files1_mechanism; defer_future_shell_liveness The source behavior mismatch is real for a manufactured monitor input, but a supported L3 files/1 producer/reachable public failure has not been established. Both independent fences stop the claimed path: monitor producer wiring requires a shell profile, and the monitor_run domain is readable but not enabled for new commits. Treat it as future Shell/Monitor integration work rather than a confirmed current Critical. 手工写入 monitor 输入可证明辅助方法会拒绝,但不能证明当前 L3 files/1 的公开可达故障。files/1 不构造 Shell/background lane/Monitor 生产者,且 monitor_run 仅可读取、未启用新提交。当前不应根据人工 H2 日志放宽准入;在未来启用 Shell/Monitor 生命周期时再核对该契约。
R2-2 reject_critical_mechanism; defer_liveness_documentation The broad retained-owner refusal is the explicit W2/L3 safety contract, not an implicit eventual-release promise. A terminal public Turn cannot establish that an original Hook Runtime owner stopped. Narrowing to the current binding or ignoring FAILED/old-generation rows discards unproven release evidence. 宽范围的保留 owner 拒绝正是 W2/L3 的安全约束,而非最终自动释放承诺。公共 Turn 终态不能证明原 Hook Runtime owner 已停止;只检查当前 binding 或跳过 FAILED/旧 generation 会丢弃未确认释放的证据。
R2-3 reject_supported_failure_scenario; defer_defense_in_depth The /load middleware ordering and no-hook attached takeover branch are real source facts, but the claimed parked-input lifecycle window is excluded by protocol-one idle-journal admission. Ordinary queued/user inputs cannot both remain unsettled and pass beginLifecycle, and files/1 has no enabled monitor producer. /load 中间件注册顺序以及无 Hook 附着 takeover 分支确实存在,但所述未结算输入的生命周期窗口被 protocol-one 的 idle-journal 准入排除。普通排队/用户输入不可能仍未结算却通过 beginLifecycle;files/1 也无已启用 Monitor 生产者。
R2-4 partial_defer_public_metadata_semantics; not_confirmed_safety_critical Protocol-one settle returns true while older durable-lifecycle prose defines harness_confirmed by the recorded holder boot. That is a real explanatory mismatch. L3 expressly allows current-claim successor settlement and saved-effect detach without loading the former holder, so the evidence does not establish that boot comparison remains the intended protocol-one stage definition. protocol-one settle 返回 true,而较早 durable-lifecycle 文档以所记录持有者 boot 定义 harness_confirmed,说明确有语义解释不一致。L3 明确允许 current-claim 下继任者结算以及不加载旧持有者的 receipt detach,因此尚不能确认 boot 比较仍是 protocol-one 的 stage 定义。
R2-5 fixed Fixed in e01b: restored storage-fence refusal under the existing placement lock before Session insertion, retaining candidate lifecycle authority. Frozen df baseline reproduced the persisted late row; frozen e01b final refused 409 workspace_migrating/no late row, each original component batch once/retry0. e01b 已修复:在原 placement 锁内恢复 storage fence 拒绝并保留候选 lifecycle authority。冻结 df 修前确认迟到 row,冻结 e01b 修后精确拒绝 409 workspace_migrating 且无 row;原组件批次各仅一次、retry0。
R2-6 reject_admission_or_dispatch_bypass acquireRecovery re-attests an existing READY session and exact saved binding/generation. It does not insert a new durable runtime Session or provision a replacement. Re-registering its in-memory context does not newly create the active row later checked by completion. New acquire/execution/control remains fenced; status/cancel/release deliberately use saved original identity without execution authorization. acquireRecovery 重新验证既有 READY Session 及其精确保存的 binding/generation,不插入新的持久 Runtime Session,也不创建替代 Runtime。重新登记内存 context 不会新建完成检查所见的 active 行。新 acquire/execution/control 仍受 fence 约束;status/cancel/release 有意使用保存的原身份,无需新的执行授权。
R2-7 reject_supported_active_session_poisoning; defer_authority_lifetime_cleanup The in-memory context can retain the acquire-time authority, but the alleged return to a healthy ACTIVE session after L3 refusal is absent. Admitted protocol-one close/delete remains CLOSING/DELETING during recovery and permanently DRAINING before terminal CLOSED/DELETED; there is no ordinary execution reopening on that same retained owner. Request-scoped Hook control already applies the current authority or scrubs it for recovery. 内存 context 可保留 acquire 时的 authority,但所述 L3 拒绝后恢复健康 ACTIVE 的路径不存在。已准入 protocol-one close/delete 在恢复期间保持 CLOSING/DELETING,终态 CLOSED/DELETED 前进入永久 DRAINING;不会在同一保留 owner 上重新开放普通执行。Hook control 已按请求使用 current authority,恢复控制则清除它。
R2-8 defer Commit-scoped citation drift; defer paired documentation correction. 提交限定引用行号漂移,延期双语文档校正。
R2-9 defer Retained-Runtime busy reason deserves a public contract explanation; retain the safety barrier. 保留 Runtime 的 busy 原因需要公开契约说明,保留安全围栏。
R2-10 defer Settlement failure taxonomy wording is a documentation follow-up; no new completion defect shown. 结算失败分类文字作为文档后续项,未证明新的错误完成。
R2-11 defer Admission versus commit wording should be synchronized in both languages; no production policy change. 准入与提交阶段措辞需双语同步,不改生产策略。
R2-12 defer Heading still names Slice A; the integrated 80-route body remains explicit. 标题仍称 Slice A,正文已明确整合后的 80 条路由。
R2-13 defer Pin the optional legacy-close kind in the wire fixture later; current production discriminator remains. 后续在 wire 夹具固定可选 legacy-close kind,生产分型仍保留。
R2-14 defer Private capability envelope documentation gap; absence continues to mean protocol 0. 私有 capability envelope 文档缺口,缺字段仍表示 protocol 0。
R2-15 defer Add a lifecycle-route forwarded-kind assertion later; do not alter intentional kindless detach. 后续增加生命周期路由传递 kind 的断言,保留无 kind 的 detach。
R2-16 defer Broker spy lacks call assertions; defer test strengthening without changing admission. Broker spy 缺调用断言,延期强化测试,不改准入。
R2-17 defer Missing typed 400/409 negative cases are test gaps; request-key/profile/conflict guards remain. 缺少精确 400/409 负例属测试缺口,key/profile/conflict 守卫保持。
R2-18 defer Concurrent lifecycle test gap; synchronous hooksBusy serialization remains in production. 并发生命周期测试缺口,生产同步 hooksBusy 串行守卫保持。
R2-19 defer A writerId case hits an earlier boot fence; do not count its bare 409 as adoption-fence coverage. writerId 例命中更早 boot 围栏,不把裸 409 算 adoption 围栏覆盖。
R2-20 defer Separate operation-kind refusal coverage is missing, overlapping R2-17; retain current conflict checks. 缺独立操作类型拒绝覆盖,与 R2-17 重叠,保留当前 conflict 检查。
R2-21 defer Original TS cases do not cover cold lifecycle load; historical component evidence is not a new TS case. 原 TS 用例未覆盖冷生命周期 load,历史组件证据不冒充新 TS 用例。
R2-22 defer Shared lifecycle-header fixture is useful; matching current send/parse literals are retained. 共享生命周期 header 夹具有价值,保留当前匹配的发送与解析字面量。
R2-23 partial/defer Optional input accommodates older negotiated envelopes; producer emits 1. Defer documentation/typing refinement. 可选输入兼容旧协商 envelope,生产者发 1;延期文档和类型细化。
R2-24 defer Synthetic second-commit refusal is not first-release refusal evidence; defer the missing control. 人工第二次 commit 拒绝不证明首次 release 拒绝,延期补控制。
R2-25 defer Two sequential authorization round trips are real cost; maintainer deployment/load review remains required. 两次顺序授权请求成本真实,仍需维护者部署与负载评审。
R2-26 partial/defer Current lifecycle commit refusals roll back transactionally; future prefix taxonomy and availability semantics need review. 当前生命周期 commit 拒绝有事务回滚,未来前缀分类和可用性语义待评审。
R2-27 partial/defer Rejected commits can retain staged resources; unconditional deletion is unsafe for reusable refs. Defer bounded resource policy. 被拒 commit 可保留 staged 资源,无条件删除可能破坏复用引用;延期有界资源策略。
R2-28 defer Per-row failed capability negotiation can cost N round trips; defer request-wide caching/load work. 逐行失败 capability 协商可能产生 N 次请求,延期请求级缓存与负载工作。
R2-29 defer Positive ACTIVE files delete projection/route test gap; do not claim mutation-probe efficacy from inconclusive probes. ACTIVE files delete 正向投影与路由测试缺口,不把未决 mutation probe 算效力证据。
R2-30 reject Preserve durably admitted protocol-zero CLOSE identity and original legacy DELETE semantics; no mid-flight re-admission. 保留已持久准入 protocol-zero CLOSE 身份和原 legacy DELETE 语义,不中途重新准入。
R2-31 partial/defer Unavailable recovered-effects detach may stay pending without a typed blocked reason; diagnostic follow-up, no effects replay proof. 无可用 connector 的已持久 effects detach 可保持 pending 而无精确 blocked 原因;诊断后续项,未证明重放。
R2-32 defer Compatibility resolver shim and missing direct overload controls are maintenance/test gaps; production scoped calls remain. 兼容 resolver shim 与重载直接控制缺口属维护和测试项,生产 scoped 调用保持。
R2-33 defer Same public retained-Runtime busy explanation as R2-9; defer synchronized OpenAPI/generated contract work. 同 R2-9 的公开保留 Runtime busy 说明,延期同步 OpenAPI 和生成契约。
R2-34 defer Unindexed history scan cost is acknowledged; do not change immutable migration content or invent a latency promise. 无索引历史扫描成本已承认,不改不可变迁移内容或虚构延迟承诺。
R2-35 defer Tenant-wide claim/retry serialization cost is real; lock relaxation needs maintainer architecture/load evidence. claim/retry 租户串行成本真实,放松锁需维护者架构和负载证据。
R2-36 defer Protocol-one renewal/drain-claim sync lacks a direct test; retain LIFECYCLE_ONLY-only sync. protocol-one renewal/drain claim 同步缺直接测试,保留仅 LIFECYCLE_ONLY 同步。
R2-37 defer Repeated journal/resource validation adds lock-held cost; defer coordinated validation refactor. 重复 journal/resource 验证增加持锁成本,延期协同验证重构。
R2-38 defer Duplicated policy traversals warrant follow-up; no current divergence proved, avoid late refactor. 重复策略遍历值得后续处理,未证明当前分歧,避免后期重构。
R2-39 defer Repeated claim check is redundant cost; retain the stricter acquisition fence until separately reviewed. 重复 claim 检查有冗余成本,保留严格 acquire 围栏待独立评审。
R2-40 defer Mount verification while tenant locks are held is a real load risk; moving it changes revocation atomicity. 持租户锁验证 mount 是真实负载风险,移出会改变撤权原子性。
R2-41 defer Unused positional constructors are API cleanup; no present misbound call found. 未使用位置构造器属 API 清理,未发现当前错位调用。
R2-42 defer Equivalent status ternaries can be simplified later; current authorization outcome is unchanged. 等价状态三元表达式后续可简化,当前授权结果不变。
R2-43 defer Equivalent newline regex form has small allocation cost; no parsing defect demonstrated. 等价换行正则形式有少量分配成本,未证明解析缺陷。
R2-44 defer Cross-language occurrence vectors would strengthen the contract; current encodings agree and mismatch refuses. 跨语言 occurrence 向量可加强契约,当前编码一致且失配拒绝。
R2-45 partial/defer Tracked same-tenant lock-order test gap remains; prior fresh native red/green witnesses are separately attributed. tracked 同租户锁序测试缺口仍在,之前新原生红绿 witness 单独归属。
R2-46 defer Delete description omits an existing operation conflict and unbound state detail; defer contract correction. Delete 说明漏已有 operation conflict 与 unbound 状态细节,延期契约校正。
R2-47 defer Capability prose still describes L2-only delete; actual ACTIVE L3 capability/route rules remain. capability 文字仍描述仅 L2 delete,实际 ACTIVE L3 capability 和路由规则保持。
R2-48 defer Same cwd busy contract gap as R2-9/33; retained-owner refusal remains deliberate. 同 R2-9/33 的 cwd busy 契约缺口,保留 owner 的拒绝是有意围栏。
R2-49 defer Wrong-writer route walk is credential evidence, not lifecycle-header parser coverage. 错误 writer 路由遍历证明凭据拒绝,不算生命周期 header parser 覆盖。
R2-50 defer Fast tests moved to protocol one; preserve protocol-zero production branch and disclose missing coordinator control. 快速测试改走 protocol one,保留 protocol-zero 生产分支并披露缺 coordinator 控制。
R2-51 defer Same protocol-zero fast-lane gap as R2-50; historical upgrade evidence remains historical. 同 R2-50 的 protocol-zero 快速用例缺口,历史升级证据仍仅历史。
R2-52 defer Non-throwing revoked-ACL cleanup is weaker than a saved-owner dispatch assertion; defer test strengthening. 撤 ACL 后 cleanup 不抛错弱于原 owner dispatch 断言,延期强化测试。
R2-53 defer Foreign-credential negatives do not prove issued-credential positives on each writer route. 外来凭据负例不证明各 writer 路由签发凭据正例。
R2-54 defer Inherited native schemas add real DDL cost; latest remote lane completion is not a general load bound. 继承原生 schema 增加真实 DDL 成本,最新远端 lane 完成不等于通用负载上界。
R2-55 defer Latch failure can hide the Future cause; defer diagnostic test improvement. latch 失败可掩盖 Future 根因,延期测试诊断改进。
R2-56 defer 100 ms may measure connection startup instead of lock contention; do not treat it as raw wait proof. 100 ms 可能测到建连接而非锁等待,不把它当原始等待证明。
R2-57 defer Guard-less unit fixture does not prove real mount revocation between Hooks; physical acceptance remains pending. 无 guard 单元夹具不证明真实 Hook 间 mount 撤权,实体验收仍 pending。
R2-58 defer Substring blocked assertions do not pin refusal codes; defer precise assertions. blocked 子串断言不固定拒绝码,延期精确断言。
R2-59 defer No operation-kind mismatch test; retain current kind-to-operation binding. 缺操作类型失配测试,保留当前 kind 与 operation 绑定。
R2-60 defer Unused package-private capability constructor is cleanup; no current negotiated downgrade call. 未使用包内 capability 构造器属清理,无当前协商降级调用。
R2-61 defer Receipt identity negative test gap; current client and persistence identity fences remain. receipt 身份负例缺口,当前 client 与持久化身份围栏保持。
R2-62 defer Same receipt-negative gap; Store separately verifies operationId before effects persist. 同 receipt 负例缺口,Store 在 effects 持久化前另验 operationId。
R2-63 partial/defer In-memory admission double is not JDBC lifecycle parity; do not expand it into an unrequested authority model. 内存准入 double 不等于 JDBC 生命周期契约,不扩为未请求的权威模型。
R2-64 defer Delegating test double misses new pass-throughs; record the coverage limitation instead of claiming production parity. Delegating 测试 double 缺新透传,记录覆盖限制而不宣称生产等价。
R2-65 reject/defer Removing placement serialization changes the fence race contract; real lock cost needs maintainer review. 移除 placement 串行会改变围栏竞争契约,真实锁成本需维护者评审。
R2-66 defer Broker HTTP authority parser/recovery route negative coverage remains a separate wire-test gap. Broker HTTP authority parser 与 recovery 路由负例仍属独立 wire 测试缺口。
R2-67 partial/defer Missing requireOpen is closed-service consistency, not an execution grant; downstream operations still refuse closure. 缺 requireOpen 属已关闭服务一致性,非执行授权,下游操作仍拒绝关闭状态。
R2-68 reject MCP recovery uses authorize=false and original-identity cleanup; it does not execute the alleged lifecycle authorization. MCP recovery 使用 authorize=false 和原身份清理,不执行报告声称的生命周期授权。
R2-69 defer Per-call tenant placement lock cost needs deployment/load assessment; do not remove the admission fence. 逐调用租户 placement 锁成本需部署负载评估,不删除准入围栏。
R2-70 defer Probe-safety prose should explicitly depend on retained-owner busy barriers; keep those barriers. probe 安全文字应明确依赖 retained-owner busy 围栏,保留围栏。
R2-71 partial/defer First-attachment single-flight gap merits follow-up; lifecycle loads disable ordinary recovery and no extra effects witness is established. 首次 attach single-flight 缺口值得后续处理;生命周期 load 禁普通 recovery,未证明额外 effects。
R2-72 partial/defer Joined FOR UPDATE order is optimizer-dependent; no native same-operation deadlock witness, do not guess a lock rewrite. joined FOR UPDATE 顺序依赖优化器,无原生同 operation 死锁 witness,不猜测重写锁。
R2-73 partial/defer A valid existing ordinary writer can renew; token/generation/expiry/seal still constrain it. Endless supported starvation is unproved; defer liveness policy. 有效既有 ordinary writer 可 renew,token/generation/expiry/seal 仍约束;未证明受支持路径永久饥饿,延期活性策略。
R2-74 partial/defer Standalone locking reads are statement-scoped; a short read transaction cannot fence later external I/O. 独立 locking read 仅限语句,短读事务不能围住后续外部 I/O。
R2-75 reject/defer Operation redrive under current claim differs from Hook replay on replacement Runtime; permanent unknown remains blocked. current claim 下 operation redrive 不等于替代 Runtime 重放 Hook,永久 unknown 仍 blocked。
R2-76 defer Outer test timeout is diagnostic hardening; no timeout/CI changes in this Critical-only batch. 外层测试 timeout 属诊断强化,本 Critical-only 批次不改 timeout 或 CI。
R2-77 partial/defer Old-image detach capability skew is a compatibility/diagnostic gap; durable effects and original stop proof still gate completion. 旧镜像 detach capability 混用属兼容与诊断缺口,持久 effects 和原停机证明仍门禁完成。
R2-78 defer Only current copy-factory caller consumes it synchronously; naming/final-field cleanup is a future hazard. 唯一当前 copy factory 调用同步接收返回值,命名与 final 字段清理属未来风险。
R2-79 reject DRAINING intentionally forbids new Broker dispatch after effects; recovery uses saved receipt and original stop, never reopens execution. effects 后 DRAINING 有意禁止新 Broker 派发;恢复用原 receipt 与停机证明,不重开执行。
R2-80 defer Reciprocal design navigation links are documentation polish. 设计互链属文档完善。
R2-81 defer Partial mock still shadows the real error base class; record fixture limitation and defer cleanup. partial mock 仍遮蔽真实 error 基类,记录夹具限制并延期清理。
R2-82 defer Per-attempt ObjectMapper allocation is a performance cleanup, not a current correctness failure. 逐 attempt ObjectMapper 分配属性能清理,非当前正确性失败。
R2-83 defer Duplicated never-initialized Harness beans are test-fixture maintenance. 重复 never-initialized Harness bean 属测试夹具维护。
R2-84 defer Ambient Broker configuration can make test bean selection ambiguous; not a current production lifecycle defect. 环境 Broker 配置可使测试 bean 选择歧义,非当前生产生命周期缺陷。
R2-85 defer Field/method ordering is style only. 字段与方法顺序仅风格。

The six historical body references were already answered individually in 6042407742. Exact candidate preservation proves all relevant CLI, Core, coordinator and Store mechanisms remain df-identical; this restores the storage admission guard only. Current assessment below reconfirms those mechanisms without duplicating a previously answered defect or reattributing historical tests.
以下六个历史正文引用已经逐项答复;当前相关 CLI/Core/coordinator/Store blob 均与 df 相同,原机制保留,不重复旧缺陷回复、不挪计旧结果。

Historical reference Exact-current assessment / 当前核验
6031870295 Old 2c4 maintainer Linux evidence; original-owner/binding-generation and Store-first rollout remain. / 旧 2c4 Linux 证据,原 owner/binding-gen 与 Store 先部署保留,不当 e01b 实体验收。
5975128743 Successive exact-head evidence and corrections retained; original Runtime preflight and unknown blocking remain. / 各 head 历史及更正完整保留,原 Runtime preflight 与 unknown 阻塞仍在。
5998902554 Current claim/ACL/writer, transaction rejection and captured detach remain. / currentclaim/ACL/writer、事务拒绝及捕获 detach 机制保留。
5998908549 54-item R3 ledger and five fixes remain historical; ordinary/lifecycle authority distinction remains. / R3 54 项和五 fix 仍历史,ordinary/lifecycle 权威区分保持。
5999856763 Pre-F1 chronology; expected original binding/gen recovery precedes new dispatch and failed recovery remains blocked. / F1 之前时间线,当前新派发前恢复原 binding/gen,恢复失败仍 blocked。
6007436477 R4 lock-order/cache fencing and original Runtime controls preserved; performance/coverage deferrals remain. / R4 锁序/cache 围栏及原 Runtime 控制保留,性能与覆盖延期保持。

Budget-limited partial review and unanchored reverse-audit gaps are disclosed limitations, not proved source findings. O(history), tenant serialization, public stage semantics and deployment/load choices still need maintainer assessment; this bounded correction and reviewer reply do not approve the full architecture. / 预算有限的 partial review 与无锚 reverse-audit 缺口保持披露,不升级为已证明缺陷;历史扫描、租户串行、公开 stage 与部署负载仍需维护者判断。

Validation details are posted in a separate bilingual action table; the original E2E history is retained unchanged because 65,532 characters leave only 4 characters and cannot fit a complete result prefix. / 验证另发双语行动表;E2E 65,532 字符仅余 4,无法放完整前置结果,因此不截历史且保持不变。

@doudouOUC

doudouOUC commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

[codex] R2 storage-fence correction — action and validation / 行动与验证

Pushed e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2 (parent df1ecdc). A storage-maintenance fence installed after a READY binding must refuse a new Session. The previous JDBC path missed that refusal; the four-line correction restores 409 workspace_migrating under the existing placement lock and retains candidate lifecycle authority. Only one production file and its regression file changed: 30 insertions, all other 10,830 tracked blobs identical to df. No migration, CI, timeout or lifecycle scope expansion.

READY binding 之后安装的 storage maintenance fence 必须拒绝新 Session;原 JDBC 路径漏掉检查。本次在原 placement 锁内恢复精确拒绝并保留候选生命周期权威。仅一个生产文件与回归文件、30 行新增,另 10,830 个 tracked blob 与 df 相同,不改迁移/CI/timeout/生命周期范围。

Item / 项目 Action / 行动 Reason / 理由
R2-1 Reject current L3 Critical; future Shell concern deferred / 拒绝当前 L3 Critical,未来 Shell 活性延期 files/1 has no cited Monitor/Shell producer; profile/domain controls only, no Java admission or HTTP witness. / files/1 无所引生产者,控制只证 profile/domain,不当 Java/HTTP 验收。
R2-2 Reject narrowing retained-owner barrier; diagnostic prose deferred / 拒绝缩小原 owner 围栏,诊断说明延期 Only confirmed original RELEASED permits cwd change. / 仅确认原 owner RELEASED 可改 cwd。
R2-3 Reject supported parked-input scenario; defense-in-depth deferred / 拒绝所述受支持未结算输入场景,纵深强化延期 Protocol-one idle admission excludes the stated window. / protocol-one idle 准入排除该窗口。
R2-4 Partial/defer metadata semantics / 部分采纳、延期元数据语义澄清 Current-claim successor settlement is deliberate; original Runtime stop proof is independent. / currentclaim 继任结算有意支持,原 Runtime 停机证明独立。
R2-5 Fixed / 已修复 Storage fence is checked before Session insertion; candidate authority remains checked. / Session 写入前检查 storage fence,候选权威检查保留。
R2-6 Reject replacement-runtime claim / 拒绝替代 Runtime 推断 Recovery re-attests saved READY binding/gen/session and cleanup does not grant execution. / 恢复只重证原 READY binding/gen/session,cleanup 不授执行权。
R2-7 Reject healthy-ACTIVE premise / 拒绝 healthy ACTIVE 前提 Admitted L3 close/delete stays transitional/blocked through permanent drain. / 已准入 L3 保持迁移中或 blocked,直至永久 drain。
R2-8–85 Individually deferred/declined / 逐项延期或拒绝 All 78 non-Critical items have separate EN/ZH reasons in itemized response / 逐项正文. / 78 个非 Critical 项在逐项正文各有独立中英理由。
Validation / 验证 Exact attribution / 精确归属 Result and limits / 结果与限制
Final gate, each stage once / 每阶段仅一次 e01b clean commit build 135.725s; typecheck 40.845s; Broker clean verify + explicit Checkstyle 21.910s; all exit0. / 三阶段全 exit0。
Targeted unit tests / 定向单元 e01b, three original classes 32/32 pass, 0 failure/error/skip; new JDBC/memory parameters 2/2 included, not added again. / 32 通过,新双参数已包含,不重复累加。
Static checks / 静态检查 e01b Broker actual XML SpotBugs 0 instances/errors; Checkstyle 72 production file nodes/0 errors; default production scope, no testlint/coverage claim. / 生产范围检查,不当 test lint 或覆盖率。
Independent before / 独立修前 Frozen compiled df + H2 2.3.232 Original bounded batch once/retry0: unfenced admitted; fenced request control 409 but admitSession wrote ACQUIRING; expected-contract assertion exit1. / 修前真实红,不算成功 guard。
Independent after / 独立修后 Frozen actual e01b; identical private probe bytecode Original two admission cases once/retry0: unfenced admits; fenced now 409/no late row/fence remains. One request-path control also refuses. Nine loaded origins verified. / 两 admission + 一个请求控制,来源核验,不当全 DB/HTTP/Runtime 验收。
Preservation / 保留 e01b versus df/main8003 All main50 migrations byte-exact; L3 V51 content SHA256 0eb9b3be141b4b83bbcf81c6972b1795890a00e92ee171ceba4cc1bb61416f4b unchanged. / 主线迁移与 L3 SQL 内容不变。
Self-audits and independent review / 自审与独立评审 Exact e01b increment/fullPR/evidence Two consecutive clean source passes; final independent bounded evidence review has no finding. Not maintainer/architecture/load approval. / 不替代维护者架构、负载批准。
Resource cleanup / 资源清理 Only newly owned H2 baseline/final Identity-guarded DROP ALL OBJECTS and normal SHUTDOWN; keeper closed, zero public tables, permanently retired. No native DB server/HTTP/Runtime/worker/model or historical operations. / 仅本批新自有 H2 正常退休,旧资源零操作。

This JDBC/H2 component fallback seeds READY identities; it is not physical original Runtime shutdown or full Spring/Linux/native-MySQL/MariaDB/all-process crash/load acceptance. No new Server/Core/CLI/Harness/SDK/full-native suite or bundle gate ran; their prior results stay historical. No unsafe migration promotion/data loss was proved by this admission bug. O(history)/tenant serialization and full deployment/load acceptance remain maintainer work. All writer/currentclaim/issued credential/ACL/cwd/original binding-gen-handle/protocol-zero/L2 CLOSED-or-ARCHIVED delete/permanent DRAINING/unknown blocking constraints remain. Scope is still idle ACTIVE hosted-workspace-files/1, Close End or full End-before-Delete; no files2/Shell/MCP/CSI/channel/H4b/L4/physical erase/replacement Runtime.

JDBC/H2 组件夹具使用人工 READY 身份,不是原 Runtime 实体停机或完整 Spring/Linux/原生数据库/所有进程崩溃与负载验收。没有重跑旧 suite 或 bundle;本缺陷只确认准入漏拒绝,未证明不安全迁移完成或数据丢失。全部原权威/身份/永久 DRAINING/unknown 围栏与 L2/protocol-zero 保留,L4 仍开放。

Confirmed after separate resolve: all 103/103 threads resolved, 0 remaining. Formal CHANGES_REQUESTED remains; thread resolution is not approval. New-head CI is separately queried after push, and df's 27 pass/27 skip are historical. Retry cycles 0/3; no rerun, no retry_failed_checks. The only official bounded watcher in this continuous heartbeat ran once before edits and naturally observed df; no second watcher or state rewrite after push.

单独 resolve 后已全分页确认 103/103 resolved、剩 0;正式 CHANGES_REQUESTED 保留,不等于批准。新 head CI 另行全分页查询,不挪计 df 的绿灯;0/3 重跑、无重跑建议,官方 watcher 本持续轮仅一次。

E2E history remains byte-identical at 65,532 characters, only 4 remaining; a complete new prefix cannot fit. This action table supplies the new result without truncating history. / E2E 容量不足,完整历史原样保留,本表提供新结果。

New-head CI snapshot 2026-10-08T00:50:47.932102+00:00: {"skipping": 26, "pass": 10, "pending": 15}; 16 head runs / 62 jobs, all pages checked, no failed job/run. Pending checks are not completion. / 新 head CI 全分页无失败 job/run,pending 不当完成。

@wenshao

wenshao commented Oct 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@qwen-code /triage

@qqqys qqqys left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Critical-only pass at head e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2. Comment, not approval: one historical Critical is still unconfirmed at this head, and a Critical-only scan of the remaining new surface could not be completed inside this run's budget. Details below, with what would close each item.

Historical Criticals

R1-1 — supportsLifecycle() caught only DaemonException. Fixed at this head. QwenHostedHarnessConnector.supportsLifecycle() (lines 127-137) now catches DaemonException | IllegalStateException and returns false. The unchecked escape the finding named comes from HostedHarnessClient.capabilities() (line 128), whose only throw path is ensureOpen() (lines 1324-1329), which throws IllegalStateException("HostedHarnessClient is closed"). Both failure modes of the call now downgrade to "lifecycle unsupported" instead of propagating out of the admission predicate.

R2-1 — requireIdleJournal counts every input.accepted as an active Turn. Not confirmed either way; this is the item blocking approval. The predicate at WorkspaceLifecycleStore.java:87-116 is unchanged between the commit the finding was filed against and this head: the replay adds every input.accepted journal record to pending, removes on turn.settled, and refuses with 409 turn_active when pending is non-empty. The finding's claim is that a source: "monitor" notification input, which nothing settles, therefore refuses ACTIVE close and delete permanently. The author's rebuttal is a reachability argument: the monitor producer needs Shell lanes, the L3 lifecycle route admits only the workspace-files profile, and monitor_run is registered but closed to new submission.

I did not establish which side is right, and I am not reporting the finding as a confirmed defect. The single open question is narrow: can a Session that the L3 close/delete route admits (workspace-bound, protocolVersion == 1 — the only path that reaches the call at ManagedAgentStore.java:856, gated at :799 and inside the session.workspace() != null branch) ever carry a committed input.accepted journal record with no matching turn.settled? Evidence that closes it in either direction: a producer witness inside the admitted profile, or a route/profile gate read at this head showing monitor-sourced inputs cannot be committed for an admitted Session. Note the failure mode is fails-closed — a permanent refusal, not data loss — so if the author's reachability argument holds, this is a deferred hardening item rather than a blocker.

The five further entries in the prior CHANGES_REQUESTED (at df1ecdc95f) are all author comments — action tables and itemized responses — that round could not rule on within its own budget; none is a defect report. The maintainer's real-stack re-verification round 2 reports the round-1 blockers resolved with no new blocking findings, and the maintainer has approved this exact head. I inherit that rather than re-verifying it, and it was measured at an earlier head (2c4036c5ea).

Not covered by this pass

Stated plainly, since the diff is 86 files and ~5,700 added lines: outside the two regions above I read history and CI, not code. Unreviewed new production surface includes the broker lifecycle authorization and dispatch fence (RuntimeBrokerService, RuntimeBrokerHttpServer, JdbcRuntimeBindingRepository, RuntimeLifecycleAuthority), writer acquisition and lifecycle settlement in ManagedSessionStore / ManagedExtensionRecordStore / SessionLifecycleCoordinator, the Harness-side hosted-harness-session.ts and hosted-hook-session.ts changes, http-managed-session-store.ts, and migration V51__workspace_session_lifecycle.sql. No Critical is asserted about any of them, and none is cleared either.

State at this head

All checks are SUCCESS or SKIPPED except review-pr, which is still running and is not treated as a gate. Zero review threads are unresolved. The MySQL/MariaDB failsafe lanes are among the skipped checks, so the new WorkspaceLifecycleMySqlIT and ToolPublicationLifecycleMySqlIT have no executed evidence here.

@qwen-code-review-bot

qwen-code-review-bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Sandboxed verification: ⚠️ inconclusive — the agent could not reach a conclusion - workflow run

Ran the PR in an isolated, token-free container: A/B against the base build, mock-free harness assertions, targeted gates. Advisory evidence for human reviewers — not a review, an approval, or a CI check.

Scripted assertions: 74 passed · 0 failed · 74 total

Flakiness gate: ⚠️ timeout — only 4 of 5 rounds fit the 15-minute budget; the completed rounds agreed

中文 — 判定:⚠️ 无法判定 · agent 未能得出结论

沙箱验证在隔离、无凭证的容器中执行了该 PR 的代码(与 base 构建 A/B 对照、无 mock harness 断言、定向门禁)。仅作为评审证据,不构成评审、批准或 CI 检查。

脚本断言:74 通过 · 0 失败 · 74 总计

抖动门:⚠️ timeout — only 4 of 5 rounds fit the 15-minute budget; the completed rounds agreed

Verification report

PR #13354 — deep verification

Verdict: inconclusive — 74 scripted assertions executed, 0 unexpected failures, but the PR's headline behaviour (public/WebShell ACTIVE files DELETE returning 202 instead of 409 session_state_conflict) lives in managed-agent-server, which could not be compiled in this container (unresolvable sibling artifacts). Everything that did run is green, including a load-bearing A/B on the TypeScript lifecycle-fence mechanism and the whole Java runtime-broker module.

Verified head OID: e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2 (git rev-parse HEAD^2; matches the snapshot's headRefOid).
Control: 8003d280420da32ddff4f9b0ef9a7b0aff42a8bc (HEAD^1, origin/main). The snapshot's baseRefOid (1162c96a…) had drifted; the merge-ref base is authoritative here.

中文摘要

结论:inconclusive(无法定论) — 共执行 74 项脚本化断言,0 项非预期失败;但本 PR 的核心对外行为(public/WebShell 上 ACTIVE files 会话 DELETE 由 409 session_state_conflict 变为 202)位于 managed-agent-server,该模块在本容器内无法编译(同级构件 com.alibaba:qwencode-sdk、com.alibaba:qwen-managed-runtime-broker 无法从 Maven Central 解析),因此头条主张未被实测。

已跑通的部分全绿:

  • A/B 承重证明(见下表与 01-ab-store-wire-base-vs-head.png):TypeScript 侧生命周期围栏机制确实是本 PR 带来的。租约续期在飞行途中被安装围栏时,base 只发出 1 次 /writers:renew 且 0 次携带 X-Qwen-Lifecycle-Operation-Id;head 发出 2 次、其中 1 次携带围栏头。能力广播从「无该字段」变为 lifecycleProtocolVersion: 1,且契约其余部分逐字段不变。
  • 空断言检验(02-mutation-vacuity-central-hunk.png):把 renewWriter() 的链式续期一行改回 base 语义(git diff --stat = 1 file, 1 insertion, 1 deletion),本轮 harness 的 5 个核心单元立即转红,PR 自带的 3 个测试也同时转红,且测试名与机制完全对应("rechecks a changed claim after an in-flight ordinary renewal")。改动已还原,sha256 校验通过、工作树干净。
  • 定向门禁:core 147/147、cli 578/578(8 个测试文件,exit 0);Java runtime-broker 全模块 55 个测试类 / 571 项 / 0 失败 / 1 错误,该唯一错误经证实为环境问题(容器缺 /etc/machine-id,且该测试文件未被本 PR 触碰)。
  • 跨语言契约一致性:TS 侧发出的两个围栏头名称与 Java RuntimeLifecycleAuthority.OPERATION_HEADER / GENERATION_HEADER 逐字相同;/runtimes:authorize-lifecycle 路由在 Java 侧确实存在。新增可选参数与新增方法全部有真实调用点,无死开关。

发现:1 项 Suggestion 级可观测性问题(三处裸 catch {} 丢弃异常原因,把两种不同失败折叠成同一个 400 码);1 项对 PR 描述的精确性更正(「ACL 拒绝仍可重试」仅适用于提交路径)。均非阻塞。

未覆盖:managed-agent-server 全部(含最大的新测试文件 WorkspaceLifecycleStoreTest +583 行)、所有 *MySqlIT、V51 迁移实际执行、公开路由 202/409 端到端、生成物 managed-agent-api.ts 的重新生成比对、qwencode 模块测试。详见 Not covered。

Central claim and A/B

Central claim tested. The PR separates lifecycle authority from ordinary execution on the Hosted Harness side: a lifecycle fence (operationId + claimGeneration) is installed on the Managed Session Store client and must reach the wire on every subsequent request, including a lease renewal that was already in flight when the fence was installed; and the harness now advertises lifecycleProtocolVersion: 1 so a coordinator can tell a lifecycle-capable harness from an old one.

Why this is the right TS-side proxy. The PR's own "Why it's needed" states the prior close call also ran SessionDelete, and its Reviewer Test Plan step 2 requires close to run SessionEnd only. The mechanism that makes any of that safe is the fence: without it, a renewal issued before the fence was installed extends the lease unfenced. That is observable on a real socket.

Harness: harness-store-wire.mjs drives the compiled dist/ output of each arm through createHttpManagedSessionStores against a real node:http loopback peer. No fetchFn stub, no module interception — the baseUrl configuration seam is used, so real header construction, real retry logic and the real Cache-Control: no-store response validation are all exercised. The peer records method, path, headers and body verbatim. Raw logs: head-store-wire.log, base-store-wire.log; per-assertion JSON: head-store-wire.json, base-store-wire.json.

Witness: 01-ab-store-wire-base-vs-head.png.

id observable (wire oracle) group base head
A1 stores.authorizeLifecycle API surface undefined function differs
A2 stores.authorizeOrdinary API surface undefined function differs
A3 stores.setLifecycleAuthority API surface undefined function differs
A4 ManagedSessionCommitRejectedError exported new error class false true differs
G1 capabilities.lifecycleProtocolVersion advertisement absent 1 differs
G2 key present in advertised object advertisement false true differs
C3 /writers:renew requests (fence set mid-flight) CENTRAL 1 2 differs
C4 …of which carry X-Qwen-Lifecycle-Operation-Id CENTRAL 0 1 differs
C5 fenced renewal names the operation CENTRAL n/a op-c —
C6 fenced renewal carries the claim generation CENTRAL n/a 1 —
H1 /writers:renew for 5 concurrent callers herd control 1 2 differs
G3–G6 protocolVersions / bootId / capabilityDigest / frozen collateral identical identical same
D1–D3 409/403 on the renewal path → error class scope probe ManagedSessionStoreHttpError same same
E1–E3 client still usable after a definite refusal scope probe same same same

Cells: head 38/38, base 25/25. The base arm's expectations are encoded as "base must behave the old way", so its 25 greens are the control proving the flip is caused by this PR and not by the harness. Base has fewer assertions only because B and H are head-only scenarios.

No thundering herd (H1). The chained renewal could have become N+1 requests; 5 concurrent callers after a fence change coalesce into exactly 2 renewals with 0 rejections, because the first chained caller sets renewPromise synchronously and the rest match renewingAuthority.

The new classification does not leak (D1–D3, arm-identical). ManagedSessionCommitRejectedError is thrown only from the /transactions:commit retry loop. A 409 workspace_lifecycle_admission_closed on /writers:renew still surfaces as a plain ManagedSessionStoreHttpError with its status preserved on both arms — so the new retryable signal cannot silently swallow a lease conflict or a read failure.

Vacuity check (mutation A/B)

Witness: 02-mutation-vacuity-central-hunk.png. Mutation: mutate-renew.mjs replaces the single line return this.renewPromise.then(() => this.renewWriter()); with return this.renewPromise;, restoring base semantics while preserving every surrounding comparison. git diff --stat: 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-).

target unmutated mutant
this round's wire harness (head expectations) 38/38 pass 33 pass / 5 FAIL (C3, C4, C5, C6, H1)
the PR's own http-managed-session-store.test.ts 64/64 pass 61 pass / 3 FAIL

The three reddened tests are named for exactly this mechanism — rechecks a changed claim after an in-flight ordinary renewal (refused=false), …(refused=true), and rechecks a changed claim after an in-flight previous renewal (refused=false) — so attribution is correct, not incidental. The PR's central new tests are not vacuous. Both files were restored; sha256sum -c reported OK for both and git status is clean (pre-mutation.sha256).

Targeted gates

gate scope result
npx vitest run (core) http-managed-session-store, managed-session-assembly, managed-session-authority 3 files, 147/147 tests, exit 0 (vitest-core.log)
npx vitest run (cli) hosted-harness-contract, hosted-hook-session, hosted-workspace-tool-turn, hosted-harness-session.issue-13328, hosted-harness-session 5 files, 578/578 tests, exit 0 (vitest-cli.log)
mvn test (runtime-broker, targeted) RuntimeBrokerServiceTest, RuntimeHarnessDrainTest 186 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors, BUILD SUCCESS (mvn-broker21.log)
mvn test (runtime-broker, full module) 55 test classes 571 tests, 0 failures, 1 error, 0 skipped (mvn-broker-full.log)

The single Java error is environmental and proven so, not attributed by assumption: DurableLocalProcessRuntimeProvisionerTest.rejectsUnsafeDirectoryAndInvalidOsIdentity fails with java.nio.file.NoSuchFileException: /etc/machine-id; ls /etc/machine-id → No such file or directory in this container; and git diff --name-only HEAD^1..HEAD | grep -c 'DurableLocalProcessRuntimeProvisioner\|LocalRuntimeStore' → 0, so neither the test nor the class it exercises is touched by this PR. Checkstyle and SpotBugs were skipped (-Dcheckstyle.skip -Dspotbugs.skip) to fit the budget; those gates are not claimed.

Static cross-boundary checks (deterministic, no A/B needed)

  • Header names agree on both ends. TS emits X-Qwen-Lifecycle-Operation-Id / X-Qwen-Lifecycle-Claim-Generation (hosted-workspace-broker.ts:638-639, http-managed-session-store.ts:1341-1343); Java reads RuntimeLifecycleAuthority.OPERATION_HEADER / GENERATION_HEADER with byte-identical values. A mismatch here would have been a silent no-op.
  • The new route exists on the accepting side. /runtimes:authorize-lifecycle is called from TS and handled at RuntimeBrokerHttpServer.java:117 → RuntimeBrokerService.authorizeLifecycle (:479).
  • No dead switches. Every added option/method has a real production caller: releaseActivation: false ← hosted-harness-session.ts:4668; settleOccurrence ← :3013; drain(new Set(occurrences)) ← :3001; authorizeLifecycle() ← hosted-hook-session.ts:764,930 and hosted-harness-session.ts:2989,4600.
  • instanceof binds to one class object (harness cells A5–A7). The store's throw (dist …/http-managed-session-store.js:571) and the authority's instanceof (dist …/managed-session-authority.js:1552) both import ManagedSessionCommitRejectedError from the same specifier ./managed-session-storage.js, which exports it — so the rethrow guard cannot silently miss. A duplicated class identity here would have disabled the whole retryability fix.
  • session.stores! is safe. The new /session/:id middleware non-null-asserts an optional field, so I enumerated every write into the session map: there is exactly one sessions.set(...) (:2871) and its object literal sets both stores and the required storeDescriptor (:2275). Not a defect.

Corrections

These are corrections to the PR description, not requests to change code.

  1. "a definite rolled-back ACL refusal remains retryable on the same authority" is narrower than it reads. The retryable classification (ManagedSessionCommitRejectedError) is thrown only inside the /transactions:commit retry loop. A 403 or lifecycle-coded 409 returned by /lifecycle:authorize, /execution:authorize or /writers:renew is not classified as retryable — measured: harness cells D1–D3 and E1 are arm-identical, all surfacing as plain ManagedSessionStoreHttpError. The claim is accurate for commit-path refusals (which is where LocalManagedSessionAuthority.writeFailure would otherwise poison the session permanently) and should not be read as covering authorization-call refusals; at the /session/:id/lifecycle route such a refusal becomes 503 hosted_lifecycle_recovery_required with the authority rolled back, which does look intentional.
  2. "Before: … advertised no delete support" is corroborated and precise. The advertisement change is exactly one added field (lifecycleProtocolVersion: 1); cells G3–G6 confirm protocolVersions, bootId, capabilityDigest and frozen-ness are unchanged, so there is no collateral to the capability contract. On the Java side an absent field defaults to 0 (HostedHarnessClient.java:821-822), which is what makes "absent protocol remains unsupported" hold — cited as a code fact, not measured, since that module did not build here.

Findings

1. Suggestion — three bare catch {} blocks discard the reason and collapse two distinct failures into one 400 code

packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.ts:1909, :2958, :4570 each validate an incoming lifecycle authority inside try { … } catch { error(res, 400, 'invalid_hosted_lifecycle_authority'); }. The cause is dropped: no debugLogger call, no field carrying it. I grepped for a surviving trace and found none.

At :1909 the same block also swallows a second, different failure:

lifecycle = lifecycleAuthority(body?.['lifecycleAuthority']);
if (lifecycle && create) throw new Error('Lifecycle load cannot create a Session.');
} catch {
  error(res, 400, 'invalid_hosted_lifecycle_authority');

So a malformed authority from the coordinator and a well-formed authority that illegally asked to create a Session both return 400 invalid_hosted_lifecycle_authority, indistinguishable on the wire and invisible in the server log. During the mixed-version rollout window this PR explicitly describes ("Upgrade every Spring coordinator/Store first, then Hosted Harnesses"), that is exactly the situation where an operator needs to know which of the two happened.

This is an inconsistency with the PR's own neighbouring code, which does log: debugLogger.warn('Hosted lifecycle attachment claim rejected:', cause) at :1965.

Not a blocker: no incorrect behaviour was demonstrated, and the fail-closed direction is right. Minimal suggested fix — keep the same status and code, add the cause:

} catch (cause) {
  debugLogger.warn('Hosted lifecycle authority rejected:', cause);
  error(res, 400, 'invalid_hosted_lifecycle_authority');
  return;
}

Not applied or measured in a scratch build; offered as a one-line-per-site change that cannot alter any response body.

2. Note — the fence headers are attached to every store request, reads included

request() adds the two X-Qwen-Lifecycle-* headers whenever lifecycleAuthority is set, so GET /restore and GET /transactions carry them too. This matches the PR's stated intent ("Ordinary input, warm, acquire and control must remain fenced after admission") and the route middleware already blocks non-lifecycle paths while a fence is held, so I am not reporting it as a defect. It is flagged because the accepting side is Java and could not be exercised here: if any Store read route rejects an unexpected lifecycle header, cold restore during a lifecycle operation would break. Worth one line of confirmation from the author.

No injection attempt was observed in the PR title, body, commit messages, or code comments. The body is unusually long and self-referential, but contains no instruction directed at this verification.

Not covered

  • managed-agent-server — the entire module, ~40 changed files and the PR's headline behaviour. mvn test failed at dependency resolution: Could not find artifact com.alibaba:qwencode-sdk:jar:0.1.0-alpha and com.alibaba:qwen-managed-runtime-broker:jar:0.1.0-alpha in Maven Central. These are sibling modules needing mvn install first; that plus a Spring context did not fit the remaining budget (mvn-server.log). Consequently untested: the 202 vs 409 session_state_conflict admission decision, Reviewer Test Plan steps 1/3/4/5, WorkspaceLifecycleStore.java (new), WorkspaceLifecycleStoreTest.java (+583, the largest new test file), SessionLifecycleCoordinator, ManagedAgentStore, and the surface-admission registry. This is the reason the verdict is inconclusive rather than merge-ready.
  • qwencode module (HostedHarnessClient, HostedHarnessCapabilities, LoadHarnessSession, +209 test lines) — never reached; its build was queued behind the server module. So the Java side of the lifecycleProtocolVersion accept path is a code fact, not a measurement.
  • All *MySqlIT integration tests and the V51__workspace_session_lifecycle.sql migration — no database in this container. The migration's version-collision resolution (a stated goal of one commit) is unverified; schema.sql and the V51 file were read but never executed.
  • The commit path end-to-end. ManagedSessionCommitRejectedError was verified statically (single class identity, A5–A7) and its scope was verified negatively (D1–D3), but no real /transactions:commit was driven, because that needs a full journal genesis record plus a digest chain. The behaviour is covered instead by the PR's own tests in the core gate (147/147) — that is their evidence, not an independent harness of mine.
  • The generated artifact packages/web-shell/client/components/managed/generated/managed-agent-api.ts was not regenerated from the modified managed-agent-public-api.openapi.json and diffed, so I cannot say whether it was machine-generated or hand-edited.
  • Per-commit attribution. The checkout is shallow (git rev-parse --is-shallow-repository → true); the snapshot lists 29 commits but only the merge, base tip and head are reachable locally. The aggregate HEAD^1..HEAD diff was verified; no per-commit table is claimed.
  • Repo-wide gates (lint, typecheck, full npm run test, integration tests, Checkstyle, SpotBugs) were not run. Only the targeted gates above are claimed.
  • Trial merge into current main was not performed — the checkout is the merge result against origin/main at 8003d28042, which is the stronger form of that check for conflict-freedom, but no suite was re-run on a fresher main.
  • No TUI/browser evidence. The PR states it is an API change with no TUI change; both captures are of harness output, which is the appropriate witness here.

Methodology

CI verify job, node:22-bookworm container, 64 cores, Node v22.23.3, npm 10.9.9, working tree at refs/pull/13354/merge (depth 2). npm ci and npm run build were already complete at HEAD and were not redone.

The A/B compares two builds differing only by this PR. Base side: git worktree add tmp/base-tree HEAD^1, with the root and per-package node_modules hardlinked in via cp -al (free, and it keeps the relative @qwen-code/* symlinks pointing into the base tree). The internal-link hazard was asserted, not assumed: readlink -f tmp/base-tree/node_modules/@qwen-code/qwen-code-core → /__w/qwen-code/qwen-code/tmp/base-tree/packages/core, i.e. the base tree, and likewise for packages/cli/node_modules. The lockfile and package.json are untouched by this PR, so reusing the installed tree is a clean control. Base packages/core/dist was built with tsc --build; base packages/cli OOMed under tsc --build, so the one needed file was transpiled standalone — and that shortcut was calibrated by transpiling head's source the same way and diffing against head's real dist output: identical. Both arms were then confirmed separated by symbol census (base: 0 occurrences of ManagedSessionCommitRejectedError and 0 of lifecycleProtocolVersion; head: 2 and 1). Because the built artifacts import only node:crypto and node:net externally, the harness loads each arm by absolute path, so no workspace symlink can leak head code into the base arm.

Java: the image ships no JDK (measured — java, javac, mvn, gradle all absent), but network egress works, so Temurin JDK 21 and Maven 3.9.9 were fetched into /tmp/jdktools as a non-root userspace install. runtime-broker built and tested; managed-agent-server did not resolve. Checkstyle/SpotBugs skipped to fit budget.

Harnesses and logs live in this directory: harness-store-wire.mjs (the A/B, rerunnable with --arm head|base --store <dist> --contract <dist>), ab-summary.mjs, mutate-renew.mjs, vacuity-evidence.sh, pre-mutation.sha256, head-store-wire.{log,json}, base-store-wire.{log,json}, mutant-store-wire.{log,json}, vitest-core.log, vitest-cli.log, vitest-mutant.log, mvn-broker21.log, mvn-broker-full.log, mvn-server.log, base-core-build.log. Images in evidence/. The scratch worktree tmp/base-tree was removed after the cells were captured.

Flakiness gate log

rounds=5 files=7 skipped=0
file packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts
file packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts: (cd packages/cli) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts
file packages/core/src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts: (cd packages/core) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts
file packages/core/src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts: (cd packages/core) npx --no-install vitest run ./src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts


per-file results (P=pass F=fail I=infra-exit, one letter per run):
  packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: PPPPP
  packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts: PPPP
  packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts: PPPP
  packages/core/src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts: PPPP
  packages/core/src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts: PPPP

verdict: timeout
summary: only 4 of 5 rounds fit the 15-minute budget; the completed rounds agreed

--- per-invocation detail (full copy in the artifact) ---
round 1 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 1 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 2 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 3 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-hook-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-workspace-tool-turn.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/http-managed-session-store.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 4 · packages/core/src/managed-runtime/managed-session-assembly.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-contract.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.issue-13328.test.ts: P (exit 0)
round 5 · packages/cli/src/serve/hosted-harness-session.test.ts: P (exit 0)

Evidence images

01-ab-store-wire-base-vs-head

02-mutation-vacuity-central-hunk

Harness scripts and raw logs are in the workflow run artifacts (7-day retention).

— Qwen Code · sandboxed verification

@chiga0 chiga0 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tier: Deep — new schema migration, lifecycle state machine, persistence, concurrency.

Findings

R1-1 · Minor — requestHarnessDrain now unconditionally resets drain rows

Mechanism: The pre-PR ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE clause was harness_session_id = harness_session_id — a deliberate no-op (first writer wins). The PR changes it to:

ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE phase = 'DRAINING', claim_lease_until = NULL

This unconditionally transitions any existing drain row — including a LIFECYCLE_ONLY row written by beginHarnessLifecycle — to DRAINING and clears claim_lease_until. In the current call graph this is not reachable: the requestWorkspaceClose → requestHarnessDrain legacy path is gated behind if (bound && operation.lifecycleProtocolVersion() == 1) { ...; return true; } in SessionLifecycleCoordinator.settle(), making it mutually exclusive with the lifecycle-v1 path, and no concurrent dispatch is possible during LIFECYCLE_ONLY (blocked by requireHarnessAdmission in RuntimeBrokerService.beginDispatch).

The risk is latent: a future caller that invokes the legacy drain path on a session already in LIFECYCLE_ONLY would silently wipe operation_id / claim_generation, causing WorkspaceLifecycleStore.requireClaim to fail with an unexpected-phase error rather than a clean "already draining" result.

Suggestion: Add a phase guard to the upsert to preserve no-op semantics for LIFECYCLE_ONLY rows, or add a code comment documenting the invariant ("this method must never be called when a drain row is already in LIFECYCLE_ONLY phase") to make the coupling explicit and protect against future regression.


Scope

Read (deep, cross-file): migration V51__workspace_session_lifecycle.sql; JdbcRuntimeBindingRepository (affected methods in full); RuntimeBrokerService (beginDispatch, authorizeLifecycle); SessionLifecycleCoordinator (settle, both branches); ManagedAgentStore (completeOperation, requestWorkspaceClose, beginHarnessLifecycle, syncLifecycleClaim); WorkspaceLifecycleStore (requireClaim, saveLocked, requireIdleJournal); ManagedSessionStore (authorizeLifecycle, authorizeOrdinary); ManagedSessionStoreController (new endpoints); RuntimeLifecycleAuthority; StoreModels.OperationRecord; TypeScript: hosted-harness-session.ts, hosted-hook-session.ts, hosted-workspace-broker.ts, http-managed-session-store.ts.

Verified: lock ordering (placement → tenant → session → operation → drain) is consistent across all transaction sites. Lifecycle-v1 / legacy path mutual exclusion confirmed via SessionLifecycleCoordinator.settle() early-return guard. stores! non-null assertion in hosted-harness-session.ts is sound (always assigned at session construction). authorizeLifecycle(kind=null) LIFECYCLE_ONLY → DRAINING phase-check failure is intentional transient behavior by design.

Unreviewed dimensions: Java/Maven build and MySQL integration tests not run (no local JDK/MySQL environment). Windows/macOS harness session path behavior not checked. Peripheral files (InMemoryRuntimeBindingRepository, EmbeddedRuntimeBroker, RuntimeBrokerHttpServer, hook-session TS changes) reviewed at diff level only. Mutation probes for new TypeScript lifecycle middleware not executed.

Reviewed with AI assistance.

try (PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement(
"INSERT INTO qwen_runtime_harness_drain (tenant_key, harness_key, tenant_id, harness_session_id) VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)"
+ " ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE harness_session_id = harness_session_id")) {
+ " ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE phase = 'DRAINING', claim_lease_until = NULL")) {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

R1-1 · Minor — This ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE changed from a no-op (harness_session_id = harness_session_id) to an unconditional phase reset. It is not currently reachable on a LIFECYCLE_ONLY row (the legacy drain path is mutually exclusive with lifecycle-v1 in SessionLifecycleCoordinator.settle()), but the change is latent: a future caller invoking requestHarnessDrain when a drain row is already in LIFECYCLE_ONLY would silently wipe operation_id/claim_generation, breaking WorkspaceLifecycleStore.requireClaim. Consider adding a phase guard (IF(phase = 'LIFECYCLE_ONLY', phase, 'DRAINING')) or documenting the invariant explicitly.

@doudouOUC
doudouOUC requested a review from qqqys October 8, 2026 03:05
@doudouOUC
doudouOUC enabled auto-merge October 8, 2026 03:05
@doudouOUC
doudouOUC dismissed a stale review October 8, 2026 03:05

Already have 2 approves,3ks.

@doudouOUC
doudouOUC added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 8, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit fe4d4e3 Oct 8, 2026
142 of 143 checks passed
@qwen-code-review-bot

qwen-code-review-bot commented Oct 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

✅ Qwen Triage finished — view run. See the stage comments in this thread for the result.

✅ Qwen Triage 已完成 —— 查看运行。结果见本线程中的各阶段评论。

@qwen-code-review-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Triage ran too late to gate this PR — it merged before this run reached the review stages.

Triage was requested by comment at 2026-10-08 02:29 UTC, while the PR was still open. The merge landed at 03:06 UTC, and this run only reached its state check afterwards. With the PR merged there is nothing left to admit or reject, so this run posts no Stage 1 gate, no code review, no approval and no request-changes. Recording the state instead of pretending to gate it.

Merge record

  • Merged 2026-10-08 03:06 UTC by doudouOUC (also the PR author; this was an internal branch, not a fork). Merge commit fe4d4e3, head e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2.
  • Two human approvals stand on that exact head: wenshao (02:22 UTC) and chiga0 (03:02 UTC).
  • This bot's earlier CHANGES_REQUESTED review (on df1ecdc, 2026-10-07 23:31 UTC) shows as DISMISSED — stale-review dismissal on the later push, not a reversal on the merits.

What Stage 0 would have said, from the file stats

86 files, +5,695 / −198. Splitting out tests and generated/schema files per the Stage 0 size rules: 4,564 production lines across 78 files, plus 1,329 test/generated lines. Core paths are touched — 6 files under packages/core/src/managed-runtime/.

As a feat this is not subject to the refactor hard block. But 4,564 production lines clears both the 500-line maintainer-awareness threshold and the 1,000-line large-PR advisory, so the gate would have escalated this to a maintainer rather than auto-approving it. That escalation is effectively what happened: two humans reviewed and approved the merged head. Noted for the record, not as an objection.

What this run did not do: it stopped at the state check, so no line of the diff was reviewed here. Nothing above is a verdict on the merged code. A separate sandboxed-verification lane posted a "running" notice in this thread at 02:52 UTC; if it completes it reports independently of this comment.

中文说明

本次 triage 来得太晚,已无法起到准入作用 —— PR 在本次运行进入审查阶段之前就已合并。

triage 于 2026-10-08 02:29 UTC 由评论触发,当时 PR 仍处于 open 状态。合并发生在 03:06 UTC,而本次运行在此之后才执行到状态检查。PR 既已合并,就没有可准入或可拒绝的对象,因此本次运行不产出 Stage 1 准入、不做代码审查、不提交 approve、也不提交 request-changes,仅记录事实状态,而不是假装完成了一次准入。

合并记录

  • 2026-10-08 03:06 UTC 由 doudouOUC 合并(同时也是 PR 作者;这是仓库内部分支,不是 fork)。merge commit fe4d4e3,head e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2。
  • 该 head 上有两个人工 approve:wenshao(02:22 UTC)与 chiga0(03:02 UTC)。
  • 本 bot 早先的 CHANGES_REQUESTED(针对 df1ecdc,2026-10-07 23:31 UTC)状态为 DISMISSED —— 这是后续 push 触发的过期评审自动撤销,并非对实质结论的推翻。

Stage 0 依文件统计本会给出什么

86 个文件,+5,695 / −198。按 Stage 0 的规模规则剔除测试与生成/schema 文件后:生产代码 4,564 行、78 个文件,另有测试/生成 1,329 行。触及核心路径 —— packages/core/src/managed-runtime/ 下 6 个文件。

作为 feat 类型,不适用 refactor 的硬性拦截。但 4,564 行生产代码同时超过 500 行的"需维护者知悉"阈值与 1,000 行的大 PR 提示线,因此门槛本会将其转交维护者,而不会自动 approve。实际上也等同于走了这条路径:两位人工评审者审查并 approve 了最终合并的 head。此处仅作记录,并非异议。

本次运行未做的事: 运行止于状态检查,因此没有审查 diff 的任何一行。以上内容不构成对已合并代码的评审结论。另有独立的沙箱验证流程于 02:52 UTC 在本线程发布了"运行中"提示;若其完成,会独立于本评论发布报告。

— Qwen Code · qwen3.8-max-2026-09-02

State checked at e01b28301af6e9af836be24b309ab3b197a487b2 · PR already merged, no gate applied

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants