Skip to content

please tag a new release/version #20

Open

Description

@jnahmias

I think there's been enough commits/changes since v1.8.4 [Jun 16, 2018] to justify a minor version bump to v1.8.5.

Activity

  1. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Nov 20, 2020

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner

    I've pushed a pending PR and have some more changes and I'll bump again. The additional changes are significant so I'll probably do a major bump

  2. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Sep 4, 2021

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner

    2.0 release is in the works

  3. Conan-Kudo commented on Oct 20, 2021

    @Conan-Kudo

    @FirefighterBlu3 Any progress on this? It'd be great to have a new release so that Fedora's Ipsilon SSO software can take advantage of it.

  4. jnahmias commented on Dec 10, 2021

    @jnahmias
    Author

    @FirefighterBlu3 any updates you can share on this?

  5. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Dec 10, 2021

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner

    Yes! I am working on a 2.0.0 branch for release. I have some things to tidy up and some testing to complete and it'll ship

  6. jnahmias commented on Dec 13, 2021

    @jnahmias
    Author

    Sounds good. Anything I can do to help?

  7. abompard commented on Mar 9, 2022

    @abompard
    Contributor

    Would it be possible to push a 1.8.5 version before 2.0.0 is ready to be published?

  8. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Mar 15, 2022

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner

    @abompard my apologies. what do you need in a 1.8.5 vs. 2.0.0?

  9. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Mar 15, 2022

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner

    2.0.1 will be released shortly pending a fix confirmation

  10. abompard commented on Mar 15, 2022

    @abompard
    Contributor

    Basically just API compatibility, it would be easier to upgrade to 1.8.5 than to 2.0.0. But it's up to you of course.

  11. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Mar 15, 2022

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner
  12. FirefighterBlu3 commented on Mar 18, 2022

    @FirefighterBlu3
    Owner

    2.0.2 out, includes some additional testing

  13. pmorch commented on Nov 17, 2023

    @pmorch

    Can this be closed?

  14. MaKaNu commented on Nov 28, 2023

    @MaKaNu

    Can this be closed?

    I would tend to say yes. But I spot a lot issues with building the project in the state right now.

    Examples:

    I just jumped onto the project and have no clue what direction the maintainer wants to achieve, so I cannot provide a Solution right now

  15. jvoisin commented on Jan 28, 2026

    @jvoisin

    A new version would be appreciated, if only so that linux distributions (like Alpine and Debian) can (finally) get rid of the dependency on six.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions