Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Emergent metric space-time from matrix theory

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 September 2022
  • Volume 2022, article number 31 (2022)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Emergent metric space-time from matrix theory
Download PDF
  • Suddhasattwa Brahma1,
  • Robert Brandenberger2 &
  • Samuel Laliberte2 
  • 1292 Accesses

  • 31 Citations

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

The IKKT matrix model yields an emergent space-time. We further develop these ideas and give a proposal for an emergent metric. Based on previous numerical studies of this model, we provide evidence that the emergent space-time is continuous and infinite in extent, both in space and in time, and that the metric is spatially flat. The time evolution describes the transition from a string-theoretic emergent phase to a phase in which the SO(9) symmetry of the model is spontaneously broken to SO(6) × SO(3), with three dimensions of space expanding, becoming classical and at later times evolving like in a radiation-dominated universe, and the remaining six dimensions of space stabilized at the string scale. We speculate on how this analysis can be extended to yield an early universe cosmology which, in addition to the above-mentioned properties, also leads to a roughly scale-invariant spectrum of cosmological fluctuations and gravitational waves.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Emergent cosmology from matrix theory

Article Open access 10 March 2022

Emergent unitarity in de Sitter from matrix integrals

Article Open access 14 December 2021

Space, Time, and (How They) Matter

Chapter © 2017

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Early Universe
  • Emergence
  • General Relativity
  • Matrix Theory
  • Cosmology
  • String Theory

References

  1. N. Weiss, Constraints on Hamiltonian Lattice Formulations of Field Theories in an Expanding Universe, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 3228 [INSPIRE].

  2. J. Cotler and A. Strominger, The Universe as a Quantum Encoder, arXiv:2201.11658 [INSPIRE].

  3. A. Bedroya and C. Vafa, Trans-Planckian Censorship and the Swampland, JHEP 09 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1909.11063] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Bedroya, R. Brandenberger, M. Loverde and C. Vafa, Trans-Planckian Censorship and Inflationary Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 103502 [arXiv:1909.11106] [INSPIRE].

  5. R. Brandenberger, String cosmology and the breakdown of local effective field theory, Nuovo Cim. C 45 (2022) 40 [arXiv:2112.04082] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Brandenberger and V. Kamali, Unitarity Problems for an Effective Field Theory Description of Early Universe Cosmology, arXiv:2203.11548 [INSPIRE].

  7. A.H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347 [INSPIRE].

  8. R. Brout, F. Englert and E. Gunzig, The Creation of the Universe as a Quantum Phenomenon, Annals Phys. 115 (1978) 78 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A.A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Sato, First Order Phase Transition of a Vacuum and Expansion of the Universe, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 195 (1981) 467 [INSPIRE].

  11. R.H. Brandenberger, Alternatives to the inflationary paradigm of structure formation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 01 (2011) 67 [arXiv:0902.4731] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems, Found. Phys. 47 (2017) 797 [arXiv:1603.05834] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. R.H. Brandenberger, String Gas Cosmology, [arXiv:0808.0746] [INSPIRE].

  14. N. Ishibashi, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa and A. Tsuchiya, A Large N reduced model as superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 498 (1997) 467 [hep-th/9612115] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Nishimura, New perspectives on the emergence of (3 + 1)D expanding space-time in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, PoS CORFU2019 (2020) 178 [arXiv:2006.00768] [INSPIRE].

  16. J. Nishimura, Signature change of the emergent space-time in the IKKT matrix model, in 21st Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, Corfu Greece, August 29 – September 8 2021 [arXiv:2205.04726] [INSPIRE].

  17. B. Ydri, Review of M(atrix)-Theory, Type IIB Matrix Model and Matrix String Theory, arXiv:1708.00734 [INSPIRE].

  18. M. Hirasawa et al., A new phase in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model and the emergence of continuous space-time, PoS LATTICE2021 (2022) 428 [arXiv:2112.15390] [INSPIRE].

  19. K. Hatakeyama et al., Relationship between the Euclidean and Lorentzian versions of the type IIB matrix model, PoS LATTICE2021 (2022) 341 [arXiv:2112.15368] [INSPIRE].

  20. K. Hatakeyama et al., Complex Langevin studies of the emergent space-time in the type IIB matrix model, (2022) [DOI] [arXiv:2201.13200] [INSPIRE].

  21. T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [hep-th/9610043] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. S. R. Das and A. Jevicki, String Field Theory and Physical Interpretation of D = 1 Strings, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 5 (1990) 1639.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Dijkgraaf, E.P. Verlinde and H.L. Verlinde, Matrix string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 500 (1997) 43 [hep-th/9703030] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Craps, S. Sethi and E.P. Verlinde, A Matrix big bang, JHEP 10 (2005) 005 [hep-th/0506180] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Blau and M. O’Loughlin, DLCQ and Plane Wave Matrix Big Bang Models, JHEP 09 (2008) 097 [arXiv:0806.3255] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. D.E. Berenstein, J.M. Maldacena and H.S. Nastase, Strings in flat space and pp waves from N = 4 superYang-Mills, JHEP 04 (2002) 013 [hep-th/0202021] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J.M. Maldacena and C. Núñez, Towards the large N limit of pure N = 1 superYang-Mills, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 588 [hep-th/0008001] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. L. Smolin, M theory as a matrix extension of Chern-Simons theory, Nucl. Phys. B 591 (2000) 227 [hep-th/0002009] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Yargic, J. Lanier, L. Smolin and D. Wecker, A Cubic Matrix Action for the Standard Model and Beyond, arXiv:2201.04183 [INSPIRE].

  30. J.Hoppe, Quantum Theory of a Massless Relativistic Surface, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, U.S.A. (1982) [http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15717].

  31. B. de Wit, J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai, On the Quantum Mechanics of Supermembranes, Nucl. Phys. B 305 (1988) 545 [INSPIRE].

  32. S. Brahma, R. Brandenberger and S. Laliberte, Emergent cosmology from matrix theory, JHEP 03 (2022) 067 [arXiv:2107.11512] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, Power-law expansion of the Universe from the bosonic Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, JHEP 11 (2015) 070 [arXiv:1506.04795] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Hatakeyama, A. Matsumoto, J. Nishimura, A. Tsuchiya and A. Yosprakob, The emergence of expanding space-time and intersecting D-branes from classical solutions in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, PTEP 2020 (2020) 043B10 [arXiv:1911.08132] [INSPIRE].

  35. H. Aoki, S. Iso, H. Kawai, Y. Kitazawa and T. Tada, Space-time structures from IIB matrix model, Prog. Theor. Phys. 99 (1998) 713 [hep-th/9802085] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. S.-W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, Expanding (3 + 1)-dimensional universe from a Lorentzian matrix model for superstring theory in (9 + 1)-dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 011601 [arXiv:1108.1540] [INSPIRE].

  37. T. Hotta, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, Dynamical aspects of large N reduced models, Nucl. Phys. B 545 (1999) 543 [hep-th/9811220] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Nishimura and G. Vernizzi, Spontaneous breakdown of Lorentz invariance in IIB matrix model, JHEP 04 (2000) 015 [hep-th/0003223] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Ambjørn, K.N. Anagnostopoulos, W. Bietenholz, T. Hotta and J. Nishimura, Monte Carlo studies of the IIB matrix model at large N , JHEP 07 (2000) 011 [hep-th/0005147] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Nishimura and F. Sugino, Dynamical generation of four-dimensional space-time in the IIB matrix model, JHEP 05 (2002) 001 [hep-th/0111102] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Kawai, S. Kawamoto, T. Kuroki, T. Matsuo and S. Shinohara, Mean field approximation of IIB matrix model and emergence of four-dimensional space-time, Nucl. Phys. B 647 (2002) 153 [hep-th/0204240] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. T. Aoyama, J. Nishimura and T. Okubo, Spontaneous breaking of the rotational symmetry in dimensionally reduced super Yang-Mills models, Prog. Theor. Phys. 125 (2011) 537 [arXiv:1007.0883] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. J. Nishimura, T. Okubo and F. Sugino, Systematic study of the SO(10) symmetry breaking vacua in the matrix model for type IIB superstrings, JHEP 10 (2011) 135 [arXiv:1108.1293] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. R.H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, Superstrings in the Early Universe, Nucl. Phys. B 316 (1989) 391 [INSPIRE].

  45. T. Aoki, M. Hirasawa, Y. Ito, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, On the structure of the emergent 3d expanding space in the Lorentzian type IIB matrix model, PTEP 2019 (2019) 093B03 [arXiv:1904.05914] [INSPIRE].

  46. R. Hagedorn, Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high-energies, Nuovo Cim. Suppl. 3 (1965) 147 [INSPIRE].

  47. P. Agrawal, S. Gukov, G. Obied and C. Vafa, Topological Gravity as the Early Phase of Our Universe, arXiv:2009.10077 [INSPIRE].

  48. W. Siegel, Two vierbein formalism for string inspired axionic gravity, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5453 [hep-th/9302036] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. W. Siegel, Superspace duality in low-energy superstrings, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2826 [hep-th/9305073] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. W. Siegel, Manifest duality in low-energy superstrings, in International Conference on Strings 93, Berkeley U.S.A., May 24–29 1993 [hep-th/9308133] [INSPIRE].

  51. C. Hull and B. Zwiebach, Double Field Theory, JHEP 09 (2009) 099 [arXiv:0904.4664] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. H. Bernardo, R. Brandenberger and G. Franzmann, String cosmology backgrounds from classical string geometry, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 043540 [arXiv:2005.08324] [INSPIRE].

  53. H. Bernardo, R. Brandenberger and G. Franzmann, Solution of the Size and Horizon Problems from Classical String Geometry, JHEP 10 (2020) 155 [arXiv:2007.14096] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. S.-W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, Late time behaviors of the expanding universe in the IIB matrix model, JHEP 10 (2012) 147 [arXiv:1208.0711] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. N. Kawahara, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, High temperature expansion in supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics, JHEP 12 (2007) 103 [arXiv:0710.2188] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. A. Nayeri, R.H. Brandenberger and C. Vafa, Producing a scale-invariant spectrum of perturbations in a Hagedorn phase of string cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 021302 [hep-th/0511140] [INSPIRE].

  57. R.H. Brandenberger, A. Nayeri, S.P. Patil and C. Vafa, Tensor Modes from a Primordial Hagedorn Phase of String Cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 231302 [hep-th/0604126] [INSPIRE].

  58. R.H. Brandenberger, A. Nayeri and S.P. Patil, Closed String Thermodynamics and a Blue Tensor Spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 067301 [arXiv:1403.4927] [INSPIRE].

  59. S. Brahma, S. Laliberte and R. Brandenberger, Spontaneous symmetry breaking in the BFSS model: Analytical results using the Gaussian expansion method, to be published.

  60. F.R. Klinkhamer, On the emergence of an expanding universe from a Lorentzian matrix model, PTEP 2020 (2019) 103 [arXiv:1912.12229] [INSPIRE].

  61. F.R. Klinkhamer, IIB matrix model: Emergent spacetime from the master field, PTEP 2021 (2021) 013B04 [arXiv:2007.08485] [INSPIRE].

  62. F. R. Klinkhamer, On the emergence of an expanding universe from a Lorentzian matrix model, PTEP 2020 (2020) 103B03.

  63. F.R. Klinkhamer, Towards a Numerical Solution of the Bosonic Master-Field Equation of the IIB Matrix Model, Acta Phys. Polon. B 53 (2022) 5 [arXiv:2110.15309] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  64. H. Steinacker, Emergent Gravity from Noncommutative Gauge Theory, JHEP 12 (2007) 049 [arXiv:0708.2426] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. H. Grosse, H. Steinacker and M. Wohlgenannt, Emergent Gravity, Matrix Models and UV/IR Mixing, JHEP 04 (2008) 023 [arXiv:0802.0973] [INSPIRE].

  66. H. Steinacker, Emergent Gravity and Noncommutative Branes from Yang-Mills Matrix Models, Nucl. Phys. B 810 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0806.2032] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. H. Steinacker, Emergent Geometry and Gravity from Matrix Models: an Introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 133001 [arXiv:1003.4134] [INSPIRE].

  68. H.C. Steinacker, Gravity as a quantum effect on quantum space-time, Phys. Lett. B 827 (2022) 136946 [arXiv:2110.03936] [INSPIRE].

  69. D.Z. Freedman, G.W. Gibbons and M. Schnabl, Matrix cosmology, AIP Conf. Proc. 743 (2004) 286 [hep-th/0411119] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. J. Hoppe, Some classical solutions of membrane matrix model equations, NATO Sci. Ser. C 520 (1999) 423 [hep-th/9702169] [INSPIRE].

  71. J. Hoppe and H. Nicolai, Relativistic Minimal Surfaces, Phys. Lett. B 196 (1987) 451.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, U.K.

    Suddhasattwa Brahma

  2. Department of Physics, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2T8, Canada

    Robert Brandenberger & Samuel Laliberte

Authors
  1. Suddhasattwa Brahma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Brandenberger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samuel Laliberte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Brandenberger.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2206.12468

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brahma, S., Brandenberger, R. & Laliberte, S. Emergent metric space-time from matrix theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 31 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)031

Download citation

  • Received: 18 July 2022

  • Accepted: 17 August 2022

  • Published: 05 September 2022

  • Version of record: 05 September 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)031

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • M(atrix) Theories
  • Cosmology of Theories BSM
  • String Models
  • Models of Quantum Gravity

Profiles

  1. Suddhasattwa Brahma View author profile

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

185.224.139.235

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature