Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Weakly coupled conformal manifolds in 4d

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 June 2020
  • Volume 2020, article number 179 (2020)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Weakly coupled conformal manifolds in 4d
Download PDF
  • Shlomo S. Razamat1,
  • Evyatar Sabag1 &
  • Gabi Zafrir2,3 
  • 665 Accesses

  • 21 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We classify \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 gauge theories with simple gauge groups in four dimensions which possess a conformal manifold passing through weak coupling. A very rich variety of models is found once one allows for arbitrary representations under the gauge group. For each such model we detail the dimension of the conformal manifold, the conformal anomalies, and the global symmetry preserved on a generic locus of the manifold. We also identify, at least some, sub-loci of the conformal manifolds preserving more symmetry than the generic locus. Several examples of applications of the classification are discussed. In particular we consider a conformal triality such that one of the triality frames is a USp(6) gauge theory with six fields in the two index traceless antisymmetric representation. We discuss an IR dual of a conformal Spin(5) gauge theory with two chiral superfields in the vector representation and one in the fourteen dimensional representation. Finally, an extension of the conformal manifold of \( \mathcal{N} \) = 2 class \( \mathcal{S} \) theories by conformally gauging symmetries corresponding to maximal punctures with the addition of two adjoint chiral superfields is commented upon.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

\( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 conformal dualities

Article Open access 06 September 2019

\( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 conformal duals of gauged En MN models

Article Open access 29 June 2020

Decoding a three-dimensional conformal manifold

Article Open access 09 February 2018

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Manifolds and Cell Complexes
  • Group Theory and Generalizations
  • Topological Groups and Lie Groups
  • Partial Differential Equations on Manifolds
  • Differential Geometry
  • String Theory

References

  1. M.F. Sohnius and P.C. West, Conformal invariance in N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 245 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P.S. Howe, K.S. Stelle and P.C. West, A class of finite four-dimensional supersymmetric field theories, Phys. Lett. B 124 (1983) 55 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Parkes and P.C. West, Finiteness in rigid supersymmetric theories, Phys. Lett. B 138 (1984) 99 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. R.G. Leigh and M.J. Strassler, Exactly marginal operators and duality in four-dimensional N = 1 supersymmetric gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B 447 (1995) 95 [hep-th/9503121] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Montonen and D.I. Olive, Magnetic monopoles as gauge particles?, Phys. Lett. B 72 (1977) 117 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Witten and D.I. Olive, Supersymmetry algebras that include topological charges, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 97 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Osborn, Topological charges for N = 4 supersymmetric gauge theories and monopoles of spin 1, Phys. Lett. B 83 (1979) 321 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Sen, Dyon-monopole bound states, selfdual harmonic forms on the multi-monopole moduli space and SL(2, ℤ) invariance in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 329 (1994) 217 [hep-th/9402032] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. O. Aharony, N. Seiberg and Y. Tachikawa, Reading between the lines of four-dimensional gauge theories, JHEP 08 (2013) 115 [arXiv:1305.0318] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality, monopole condensation and confinement in N = 2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. E. Witten, Some comments on string dynamics, in the proceedings of STRINGS 95: Future Perspectives in String Theory, March 13–18, Los Angeles, U.S.A. (1995), hep-th/9507121 [INSPIRE].

  12. D. Gaiotto, N = 2 dualities, JHEP 08 (2012) 034 [arXiv:0904.2715] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L.F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa, Liouville correlation functions from four-dimensional gauge theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 91 (2010) 167 [arXiv:0906.3219] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Gadde, E. Pomoni, L. Rastelli and S.S. Razamat, S-duality and 2d topological QFT, JHEP 03 (2010) 032 [arXiv:0910.2225] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Kapustin and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1 (2007) 1 [hep-th/0604151] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Gaiotto and S.S. Razamat, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 theories of class \( {\mathcal{S}}_k \), JHEP 07 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1503.05159] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Hanany and K. Maruyoshi, Chiral theories of class \( \mathcal{S} \), JHEP 12 (2015) 080 [arXiv:1505.05053] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Franco, H. Hayashi and A. Uranga, Charting class \( {\mathcal{S}}_k \) territory, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 045004 [arXiv:1504.05988] [INSPIRE].

  19. S.S. Razamat, C. Vafa and G. Zafrir, 4d \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 from 6d (1, 0), JHEP 04 (2017) 064 [arXiv:1610.09178] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Bah et al., 4d \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 from 6d mathcalN = (1, 0) on a torus with fluxes, JHEP 06 (2017) 022 [arXiv:1702.04740] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. S.S. Razamat and G. Zafrir, Compactification of 6d minimal SCFTs on Riemann surfaces, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 066006 [arXiv:1806.09196] [INSPIRE].

  22. D. Green et al., Exactly marginal deformations and global symmetries, JHEP 06 (2010) 106 [arXiv:1005.3546] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Seiberg, Nontrivial fixed points of the renormalization group in six-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 169 [hep-th/9609161] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Bershadsky and C. Vafa, Global anomalies and geometric engineering of critical theories in six-dimensions, hep-th/9703167 [INSPIRE].

  25. H.-C. Kim, S.S. Razamat, C. Vafa and G. Zafrir, D-type conformal matter and SU/USp quivers, JHEP 06 (2018) 058 [arXiv:1802.00620] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. H.-C. Kim, S.S. Razamat, C. Vafa and G. Zafrir, Compactifications of ADE conformal matter on a torus, JHEP 09 (2018) 110 [arXiv:1806.07620] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. P.C. Argyres and N. Seiberg, S-duality in N = 2 supersymmetric gauge theories, JHEP 12 (2007) 088 [arXiv:0711.0054] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. S.S. Razamat and G. Zafrir, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 conformal duals of gauged En MN models, arXiv:2003.01843 [INSPIRE].

  29. B. Kol, On conformal deformations, JHEP 09 (2002) 046 [hep-th/0205141] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. B. Kol, On conformal deformations II, arXiv:1005.4408 [INSPIRE].

  31. L. Bhardwaj and Y. Tachikawa, Classification of 4d N = 2 gauge theories, JHEP 12 (2013) 100 [arXiv:1309.5160] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. L. Bhardwaj, Classification of 6d \( \mathcal{N} \) = (1, 0) gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2015) 002 [arXiv:1502.06594] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. J.J. Heckman and T. Rudelius, Top down approach to 6D SCFTs, J. Phys. 52 (2019) 093001 [arXiv:1805.06467] [INSPIRE].

  34. P. Jefferson, H.-C. Kim, C. Vafa and G. Zafrir, Towards classification of 5d SCFTs: single gauge node, arXiv:1705.05836 [INSPIRE].

  35. P. Jefferson, S. Katz, H.-C. Kim and C. Vafa, On geometric classification of 5d SCFTs, JHEP 04 (2018) 103 [arXiv:1801.04036] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Hayashi, S.-S. Kim, K. Lee and F. Yagi, Dualities and 5-brane webs for 5d rank 2 SCFTs, JHEP 12 (2018) 016 [arXiv:1806.10569] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. F. Apruzzi, L. Lin and C. Mayrhofer, Phases of 5d SCFTs from M-/F-theory on non-flat fibrations, JHEP 05 (2019) 187 [arXiv:1811.12400] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. C. Closset, M. Del Zotto and V. Saxena, Five-dimensional SCFTs and gauge theory phases: an M-theory/type IIA perspective, SciPost Phys. 6 (2019) 052 [arXiv:1812.10451] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. F. Apruzzi et al., 5d superconformal field theories and graphs, Phys. Lett. B 800 (2019) 135077 [arXiv:1906.11820].

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. F. Apruzzi et al., Fibers add flavor. Part I. Classification of 5d SCFTs, Flavor Symmetries and BPS States, JHEP 11 (2019) 068 [arXiv:1907.05404] [INSPIRE].

  41. L. Bhardwaj, On the classification of 5d SCFTs, arXiv:1909.09635 [INSPIRE].

  42. F. Apruzzi et al., Fibers add flavor. Part II. 5d SCFTs, gauge theories and dualities, JHEP 03 (2020) 052 [arXiv:1909.09128] [INSPIRE].

  43. L. Bhardwaj, Do all 5d SCFTs descend from 6d SCFTs?, arXiv:1912.00025 [INSPIRE].

  44. F. Apruzzi, S. Schäfer-Nameki and Y.-N. Wang, 5d SCFTs from decoupling and gluing, arXiv:1912.04264 [INSPIRE].

  45. L. Bhardwaj and G. Zafrir, Classification of 5d N = 1 gauge theories, arXiv:2003.04333 [INSPIRE].

  46. C. Cordova, T.T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Deformations of superconformal theories, JHEP 11 (2016) 135 [arXiv:1602.01217] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. C. Cordova, T.T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Multiplets of superconformal symmetry in diverse dimensions, JHEP 03 (2019) 163 [arXiv:1612.00809] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. P. Argyres and M. Martone, Construction and classification of Coulomb branch geometries, arXiv:2003.04954 [INSPIRE].

  49. C. Beem et al., Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 336 (2015) 1359 [arXiv:1312.5344] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. N.A. Nekrasov and S.L. Shatashvili, Quantization of integrable systems and four dimensional gauge theories, in the proceedings of the 16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics, August 3–8, Prague, Czech Republic (2009), [arXiv:0908.4052] [INSPIRE].

  51. N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT correspondence: non-perturbative Dyson-Schwinger equations and qq-characters, JHEP 03 (2016) 181 [arXiv:1512.05388] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. N. Nekrasov, BPS/CFT Correspondence III: gauge origami partition function and qq-characters, Commun. Math. Phys. 358 (2018) 863 [arXiv:1701.00189] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. D. Gaiotto, L. Rastelli and S.S. Razamat, Bootstrapping the superconformal index with surface defects, JHEP 01 (2013) 022 [arXiv:1207.3577] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. K. Maruyoshi and J. Yagi, Surface defects as transfer matrices, PTEP 2016 (2016) 113B01 [arXiv:1606.01041] [INSPIRE].

  55. S.S. Razamat, Flavored surface defects in 4d \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 SCFTs, Lett. Math. Phys. 109 (2019) 1377 [arXiv:1808.09509] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. B. Nazzal and S.S. Razamat, Surface defects in E-string compactifications and the van Diejen model, SIGMA 14 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1801.00960] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. N. Seiberg, Electric-magnetic duality in supersymmetric nonAbelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 129 [hep-th/9411149] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. K. Maruyoshi, E. Nardoni and J. Song, Landscape of simple superconformal field theories in 4d, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 121601 [arXiv:1806.08353] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. S.S. Razamat and G. Zafrir, N = 1 conformal dualities, JHEP 09 (2019) 046 [arXiv:1906.05088] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  60. J. Kinney, J.M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju, An index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 275 (2007) 209 [hep-th/0510251] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  61. C. Romelsberger, Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d = 4 superconformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B 747 (2006) 329 [hep-th/0510060] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. F.A. Dolan and H. Osborn, Applications of the superconformal index for protected operators and q-hypergeometric identities to N = 1 dual theories, Nucl. Phys. B 818 (2009) 137 [arXiv:0801.4947] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. F. Benini, T. Nishioka and M. Yamazaki, 4d index to 3d index and 2d TQFT, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065015 [arXiv:1109.0283] [INSPIRE].

  64. S.S. Razamat and B. Willett, Global properties of supersymmetric theories and the lens space, Commun. Math. Phys. 334 (2015) 661 [arXiv:1307.4381] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  65. A.P. Kels and M. Yamazaki, Elliptic hypergeometric sum/integral transformations and supersymmetric lens index, SIGMA 14 (2018) 013 [arXiv:1704.03159] [INSPIRE].

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett, \( \mathcal{N} \) = 1 supersymmetric indices and the four-dimensional A-model, JHEP 08 (2017) 090 [arXiv:1707.05774] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  67. Z. Komargodski, S.S. Razamat, O. Sela and A. Sharon, A nilpotency index of conformal manifolds, arXiv:2003.04579 [INSPIRE].

  68. H.-C. Kim, S.S. Razamat, C. Vafa and G. Zafrir, E-string theory on Riemann surfaces, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) 1700074 [arXiv:1709.02496] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. S.S. Razamat and E. Sabag, Sequences of 6d SCFTs on generic Riemann surfaces, JHEP 01 (2020) 086 [arXiv:1910.03603] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. S. Pasquetti, S.S. Razamat, M. Sacchi and G. Zafrir, Rank Q E-string on a torus with flux, SciPost Phys. 8 (2020) 014 [arXiv:1908.03278] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems and the WKB approximation, arXiv:0907.3987 [INSPIRE].

  72. E. Witten, An SU(2) anomaly, Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 324 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  73. C. Beem and A. Gadde, The N = 1 superconformal index for class S fixed points, JHEP 04 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1212.1467] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  74. P.C. West, The Yukawa β-function in N = 1 Rigid Supersymmetric Theories, Phys. Lett. B 137 (1984) 371 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  75. V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, The β-function in supersymmetric gauge theories. Instantons versus traditional approach, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 43 (1986) 294 [INSPIRE].

  76. M.A. Shifman and A.I. Vainshtein, On holomorphic dependence and infrared effects in supersymmetric gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 359 (1991) 571 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg and B. Willett, Generalized global symmetries, JHEP 02 (2015) 172 [arXiv:1412.5148] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  78. O. Lunin and J.M. Maldacena, Deforming field theories with U(1) × U(1) global symmetry and their gravity duals, JHEP 05 (2005) 033 [hep-th/0502086] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. K.A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, The exact superconformal R symmetry maximizes a, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 183 [hep-th/0304128] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  80. D. Kutasov, A. Parnachev and D.A. Sahakyan, Central charges and U(1)(R) symmetries in N = 1 super-Yang-Mills, JHEP 11 (2003) 013 [hep-th/0308071] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. E. Barnes, K.A. Intriligator, B. Wecht and J. Wright, Evidence for the strongest version of the 4d a-theorem, via a-maximization along RG flows, Nucl. Phys. B 702 (2004) 131 [hep-th/0408156] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  82. S. Benvenuti and S. Giacomelli, Supersymmetric gauge theories with decoupled operators and chiral ring stability, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 251601 [arXiv:1706.02225] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. I. Bah, C. Beem, N. Bobev and B. Wecht, Four-dimensional SCFTs from M 5-branes, JHEP 06 (2012) 005 [arXiv:1203.0303] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. K.A. Intriligator and B. Wecht, RG fixed points and flows in SQCD with adjoints, Nucl. Phys. B 677 (2004) 223 [hep-th/0309201] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. F. Benini, Y. Tachikawa and B. Wecht, Sicilian gauge theories and N = 1 dualities, JHEP 01 (2010) 088 [arXiv:0909.1327] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  86. D. Kutasov and A. Schwimmer, On duality in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Lett. B 354 (1995) 315 [hep-th/9505004] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  87. J.H. Brodie, Duality in supersymmetric SU(Nc) gauge theory with two adjoint chiral superfields, Nucl. Phys. B 478 (1996) 123 [hep-th/9605232] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  88. D. Kutasov and J. Lin, Exceptional N = 1 duality, arXiv:1401.4168 [INSPIRE].

  89. K. Intriligator and E. Nardoni, Deformations of WA,D,E SCFTs, JHEP 09 (2016) 043 [arXiv:1604.04294] [INSPIRE].

  90. A. Bourget et al., The Higgs mechanism — Hasse diagrams for symplectic singularities, JHEP 01 (2020) 157 [arXiv:1908.04245] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Technion, 32000, Haifa, Israel

    Shlomo S. Razamat & Evyatar Sabag

  2. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8583, Japan

    Gabi Zafrir

  3. Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano-Bicocca & INFN — Sezione di Milano-Bicocca, I-20126, Milano, Italy

    Gabi Zafrir

Authors
  1. Shlomo S. Razamat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evyatar Sabag
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gabi Zafrir
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabi Zafrir.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2004.07097

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razamat, S.S., Sabag, E. & Zafrir, G. Weakly coupled conformal manifolds in 4d. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 179 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)179

Download citation

  • Received: 16 May 2020

  • Accepted: 05 June 2020

  • Published: 29 June 2020

  • Version of record: 29 June 2020

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)179

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Conformal Field Theory
  • Supersymmetric Gauge Theory

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

185.224.139.235

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature